"Addiction is a Disease" ... New Definition!

Page 1 of 1 [ 12 posts ] 

ouinon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,939
Location: Europe

20 Aug 2011, 2:54 pm

Interesting new study/analysis by ASAM ( the American Society of Addiction Medecine ) at: http://www.asam.org/DefinitionofAddicti ... rsion.html

Quote:
Addiction is a primary, chronic disease of brain reward, motivation, memory and related circuitry. Addiction affects neurotransmission and interactions within reward structures of the brain, including the nucleus accumbens, anterior cingulate cortex, basal forebrain and amygdala, such that motivational hierarchies are altered and addictive behaviors, which may or may not include alcohol and other drug use, supplant healthy, self-care related behaviors. Addiction also affects neurotransmission and interactions between cortical and hippocampal circuits and brain reward structures, such that the memory of previous exposures to rewards (such as food, sex, alcohol and other drugs) leads to a biological and behavioral response to external cues, in turn triggering craving and/or engagement in addictive behaviors.


Quote:
In addiction there is a significant impairment in executive functioning, which manifests in problems with perception, learning, impulse control, compulsivity, and judgment. People with addiction often manifest a lower readiness to change their dysfunctional behaviors despite mounting concerns expressed by significant others in their lives; and display an apparent lack of appreciation of the magnitude of cumulative problems and complications. The still developing frontal lobes of adolescents may both compound these deficits in executive functioning and predispose youngsters to engage in “high risk” behaviors, including engaging in alcohol or other drug use. The profound drive or craving to use substances or engage in apparently rewarding behaviors, which is seen in many patients with addiction, underscores the compulsive or avolitional aspect of this disease. This is the connection with “powerlessness” over addiction and “unmanageability” of life, as is described in Step 1 of 12 Steps programs.


Quote:
Addiction is more than a behavioral disorder. Features of addiction include aspects of a person’s behaviors, cognitions, emotions, and interactions with others, including a person’s ability to relate to members of their family, to members of their community, to their own psychological state, and to things that transcend their daily experience.


Quote:
Behavioral manifestations and complications of addiction, primarily due to impaired control, can include:

Excessive use and/or engagement in addictive behaviors, at higher frequencies and/or quantities than the person intended, often associated with a persistent desire for and unsuccessful attempts at behavioral control;
Excessive time lost in substance use or recovering from the effects of substance use and/or engagement in addictive behaviors, with significant adverse impact on social and occupational functioning (e.g. the development of interpersonal relationship problems or the neglect of responsibilities at home, school or work);
Continued use and/or engagement in addictive behaviors, despite the presence of persistent or recurrent physical or psychological problems which may have been caused or exacerbated by substance use and/or related addictive behaviors;
A narrowing of the behavioral repertoire focusing on rewards that are part of addiction; and
An apparent lack of ability and/or readiness to take consistent, ameliorative action despite recognition of problems.

Cognitive changes in addiction can include:

Preoccupation with substance use;
Altered evaluations of the relative benefits and detriments associated with drugs or rewarding behaviors; and
The inaccurate belief that problems experienced in one’s life are attributable to other causes rather than being a predictable consequence of addiction.

Emotional changes in addiction can include:

Increased anxiety, dysphoria and emotional pain;
Increased sensitivity to stressors associated with the recruitment of brain stress systems, such that “things seem more stressful” as a result; and
Difficulty in identifying feelings, distinguishing between feelings and the bodily sensations of emotional arousal, and describing feelings to other people (sometimes referred to as alexithymia).


I am struck by the number of similarities between this diagnosis/description of "symptoms", and those experienced by a sizeable subgroup of people on the Autism Spectrum.

... Particularly in the light of a study which came out in April 2010 showing that a subgroup, ( about 36%, over a third ) of people on the spectrum have unusually permeable intestinal walls, ( compared to about 5% of the general pop ) which enables the passage of abnormally high quantities of the opioids present in dairy and glutenous grains/cereals like wheat.

[ Gluten is not only an opioid but is also the largest food molecule that we eat, and is usually broken down into smaller inactive components before passing from the intestines into the blood, brain etc, but in people with unusually permeable intestinal walls such large molecules can and do pass through in their fully active state. ]

And of course many/most people in the west eat wheat and dairy from earliest infancy, ... ... ... and this ASAM study suggests that although addiction is partly genetically determined it is also determined by the age at which a person is first exposed to substances like nictotine, alcohol, and opiates, which affect/alter the balance of the brain's reward system.

:)
.



Mindslave
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,034
Location: Where the wild things wish they were

20 Aug 2011, 3:59 pm

I was first exposed to Ritalin at the age of 5. Does that count?



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

20 Aug 2011, 6:28 pm

So if you have unusually permeable intestine walls you can get high off eating bread?



John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

20 Aug 2011, 6:50 pm

ouinon wrote:
I am struck by the number of similarities between this diagnosis/description of "symptoms", and those experienced by a sizeable subgroup of people on the Autism Spectrum.

... Particularly in the light of a study which came out in April 2010 showing that a subgroup, ( about 36%, over a third ) of people on the spectrum have unusually permeable intestinal walls, ( compared to about 5% of the general pop ) which enables the passage of abnormally high quantities of the opioids present in dairy and glutenous grains/cereals like wheat.

[ Gluten is not only an opioid but is also the largest food molecule that we eat, and is usually broken down into smaller inactive components before passing from the intestines into the blood, brain etc, but in people with unusually permeable intestinal walls such large molecules can and do pass through in their fully active state. ]

And of course many/most people in the west eat wheat and dairy from earliest infancy, ... ... ... and this ASAM study suggests that although addiction is partly genetically determined it is also determined by the age at which a person is first exposed to substances like nictotine, alcohol, and opiates, which affect/alter the balance of the brain's reward system.

:)


I hope they are not going to try and use this to excuse bad behavior in court because the judges hear it so much that it just pisses them off now. They are still responsible for their actions. Not even AA, NA, or similar support groups will accept that as an excuse. They will be accountable to get help before any addictive behavior before it creates legal problems for them.

Opoids naturally occur in all mammal's milks including humans. It is natural for us to be exposed to them and it is perfectly safe. While wheat is not a natural food for humans, it is safe unless someone has some type of allergy. Studies have shown no link between gluten compounds and behavior problems, and the only people making such claims are people like Jenny McCarthy and lunatic fringe cure groups. If they are so concerned abut opoid antagonists in food, they have overlooked a really big one.


_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown

"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud


jojobean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,341
Location: In Georgia sipping a virgin pina' colada while the rest of the world is drunk

20 Aug 2011, 9:14 pm

I always thought it was a brain chemestry thing. I have known a few hard core addicts and they too are just wired differently. I always thought that it was some form of OCD, but looking at the article I agree there seems to be something wrong with the reward centers of the brains of addicts.

However, I agree with John that it still is not an excuse for illegal behavior because everyone becides maybe a person with moderate mental retardation is responcible for their actions within the context of the law.
Addicts are responsible for getting help before things lead to illegal behavior. From what I have seen jail time has helped a few of my friends get sober.

Jojo


_________________
All art is a kind of confession, more or less oblique. All artists, if they are to survive, are forced, at last, to tell the whole story; to vomit the anguish up.
-James Baldwin


Apple_in_my_Eye
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,420
Location: in my brain

20 Aug 2011, 9:16 pm

Quote:
In addiction there is a significant impairment in executive functioning, which manifests in problems with perception, learning, impulse control, compulsivity, and judgment.

The problem with that statement is that executive functioning is a system/function of the brain which is very sensitive to any sort of "insult." That is, it can be disrupted a large number of things, so using it as an indicator of a specific condition is not very useful.

It's like saying that heroin withdrawl is the same as malaria, because they both involve having a fever.

As far as the opioid hypothesis, I remember seeing that proposed for self-injurious behavior in the 90's. They tried giving people opioid blockers, but then news about that just faded away. It didn't seem like worked out to be some revolutionary cure or anything.

I have weird reactions to all sorts of foods, so keeping a strict diet helps me, but only in the sense that I don't feel ill/irritated/uncontrollably-sleepy on top of other difficulties.



visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

21 Aug 2011, 10:22 am

John_Browning wrote:
I hope they are not going to try and use this to excuse bad behavior in court because the judges hear it so much that it just pisses them off now. They are still responsible for their actions. Not even AA, NA, or similar support groups will accept that as an excuse. They will be accountable to get help before any addictive behavior before it creates legal problems for them.


You need to distinguish between, "excuse," "justification," and, "mitigation." All of these are related concepts but they have very different legal meanings.

I don't think that anyone seriously believes that addition excuses misconduct. But addition may be a mitigating factor when it comes to a judicial remedy.

Quote:
Opoids naturally occur in all mammal's milks including humans. It is natural for us to be exposed to them and it is perfectly safe. While wheat is not a natural food for humans, it is safe unless someone has some type of allergy. Studies have shown no link between gluten compounds and behavior problems, and the only people making such claims are people like Jenny McCarthy and lunatic fringe cure groups. If they are so concerned abut opoid antagonists in food, they have overlooked a really big one.


Medically, I think the jury's still out on a lot of this. We have done a great deal of messing with the food chain since the "cheap food" policy of the 70's. Combine that with a huge amount to tinkering with people's biochemistry through pharmaceuticals and the possibility of significant impacts becomes ever more real.


_________________
--James


John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

22 Aug 2011, 12:06 am

visagrunt wrote:
John_Browning wrote:
I hope they are not going to try and use this to excuse bad behavior in court because the judges hear it so much that it just pisses them off now. They are still responsible for their actions. Not even AA, NA, or similar support groups will accept that as an excuse. They will be accountable to get help before any addictive behavior before it creates legal problems for them.


You need to distinguish between, "excuse," "justification," and, "mitigation." All of these are related concepts but they have very different legal meanings.

I don't think that anyone seriously believes that addition excuses misconduct. But addition may be a mitigating factor when it comes to a judicial remedy.

Quote:
Opoids naturally occur in all mammal's milks including humans. It is natural for us to be exposed to them and it is perfectly safe. While wheat is not a natural food for humans, it is safe unless someone has some type of allergy. Studies have shown no link between gluten compounds and behavior problems, and the only people making such claims are people like Jenny McCarthy and lunatic fringe cure groups. If they are so concerned abut opoid antagonists in food, they have overlooked a really big one.


Medically, I think the jury's still out on a lot of this. We have done a great deal of messing with the food chain since the "cheap food" policy of the 70's. Combine that with a huge amount to tinkering with people's biochemistry through pharmaceuticals and the possibility of significant impacts becomes ever more real.


That would depend. If someone was simply drunk in public then yeah, there may be room for mitigating circumstances. If someone beats up their family or gets into a DUI accident, then they are accountable to know what they are getting into before they start drinking. The driver plans on driving back before he even does out drinking, and people don't just one day get drunk and beat up people weaker than them. They have some clue that they are a total a**hole and a walking arrestable offense and do it anyway. If you were to talk to leaders and sponsors in a 12-step group about mitigating circumstances, they generally don't approve of them. They might be okay with it if someone got busted for simple possession for the first time as long as they were required to get treatment, but that's about it! For a more extreme example: bringing up any news about Lindsay Lohan at a chemical dependency support group would not go over well. There were never any mitigating circumstances in her case. If she was not rich and famous that judge would have thrown her stupid ass in jail at least 2 years ago!


_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown

"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud


Burnbridge
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 971
Location: Columbus, Ohio

26 Aug 2011, 6:08 am

Hmmm....

Dis-ease would seem to mean "not at ease." Which kind of sounds like jonesing for drugs.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

26 Aug 2011, 10:46 am

jojobean wrote:
I always thought it was a brain chemestry thing. I have known a few hard core addicts and they too are just wired differently. I always thought that it was some form of OCD, but looking at the article I agree there seems to be something wrong with the reward centers of the brains of addicts.

However, I agree with John that it still is not an excuse for illegal behavior because everyone becides maybe a person with moderate mental retardation is responcible for their actions within the context of the law.
Addicts are responsible for getting help before things lead to illegal behavior. From what I have seen jail time has helped a few of my friends get sober.

Jojo


I doubt it is that simple....one does not have to be ret*d to have bad judgement.



slipacre
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Age: 78
Gender: Male
Posts: 97
Location: NY state - in the woods

26 Aug 2011, 6:30 pm

this fits with my theory that many on the spectrum have problems with alcohol and or drugs.
I in essence self medicated for years until I was 39
found AA and for the first time felt accepted
Have been sober 20+ years and watching the social ineptness in AA
started thinking about Autism Spectrum
Took the tests and got "you're it"
I suspect there is a great deal of overlap
Many many stories in AA talk about feeling different wrong planet even
and how alcohol seemed to "solve " those problems
until it became a monster and devoured us.

Believe me this self diagnosis with multiple and repeated tests answers a lot of questions

For what its worth - results may vary.



Daryl_Blonder
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 473
Location: Salem, CT

27 Aug 2011, 2:05 am

I can say in no uncertain terms that I am an addict. That is, I have an addictive personality.

I don't have it all that often, but I'm positively addicted to sex. The thought of it gives my whole body a rush, and the act of it, even more of a rush.

I'm positively addicted to food. When I eat I don't want to stop. I just want to keep eating and eating until I burst.

On a similar note, I'm addicted to sugar. It gives me almost as much of a high as sex. In fact, when I plan a really "good day" for myself, I make sure to include plenty of high-calorie meals along with sex.

I'm addicted to sleep meds. I do not abuse them, but I crave the stoned feeling they give me that lets me drift off to sleep.

Whatever it is about the brain that makes some people this way and other not, well, I am. 8O

*******************************************************************************************************************

Check out my IMDB page!