Wikipedia to blackout in protest of SOPA

Page 1 of 3 [ 40 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

PM
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,466
Location: Southeastern United States

16 Jan 2012, 9:04 pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative


Good on them, and it seems the way things are going that SOPA/PIPA will never see the light of day.


_________________
Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?


alex
Developer
Developer

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,214
Location: Beverly Hills, CA

16 Jan 2012, 9:06 pm

I'm so glad they're actually going to do it.


_________________
I'm Alex Plank, the founder of Wrong Planet. Follow me (Alex Plank) on Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/alexplank.bsky.social


PM
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,466
Location: Southeastern United States

16 Jan 2012, 9:11 pm

^Would you consider blacking out in protest?


_________________
Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?


alex
Developer
Developer

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,214
Location: Beverly Hills, CA

16 Jan 2012, 9:13 pm

PM wrote:
^Would you consider blacking out in protest?


Yeah but only if others did the same.


_________________
I'm Alex Plank, the founder of Wrong Planet. Follow me (Alex Plank) on Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/alexplank.bsky.social


Cultus_Diabolus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 682
Location: usa

16 Jan 2012, 9:15 pm

http://redtape.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012 ... n-blackout

redit and wiki are doing black outs, i herd some were google was thinking about it to. we should to imo


_________________
Kill a man and you?re a murderer. Kill many and you?re a hero. Kill them all you?re favored by the gods. ?or dangerously unbalanced-


so_subtly_strange
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 295

16 Jan 2012, 11:32 pm

i dont completely understand this. censorship is bad yes, i vaguely gather that wikipedia uses international sources. but i am having a little trouble wraping my mind around the scope of this. could someone give an example of a consequence were the bill to be passed?



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,740
Location: the island of defective toy santas

17 Jan 2012, 12:12 am

PM wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative
Good on them, and it seems the way things are going that SOPA/PIPA will never see the light of day.

never say never. i would not put past those guys, the possibility that they'd figure out a way to slip us all the mean green weinie in the dead of night, somehow, just before a recess.



Nexus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 833
Location: On I2

17 Jan 2012, 2:27 am

SOPA and PIPA will be back, maybe slightly watered down but still malicious in intent. Basically it's the "Door-in-the-face technique" they're trying here. This is where you introduce a horrendous offer that people will reject immediately but upon the second offer, it'll sound better (but it will be the same product if you get what I mean).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Door-in-the-face_technique


_________________
"Have a nice apocalypse" - Southland Tales


snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

17 Jan 2012, 3:25 am

Nexus wrote:
SOPA and PIPA will be back, maybe slightly watered down but still malicious in intent. Basically it's the "Door-in-the-face technique" they're trying here. This is where you introduce a horrendous offer that people will reject immediately but upon the second offer, it'll sound better (but it will be the same product if you get what I mean).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Door-in-the-face_technique


I thought that was how they were going to get PIPA in.


_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*

some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"


alex
Developer
Developer

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,214
Location: Beverly Hills, CA

17 Jan 2012, 11:01 am

This is definitely a big concern for sites like Wrong Planet.

The law would make it impossible from a logistical standpoint to manage any sort of large user generated forum site like this.


_________________
I'm Alex Plank, the founder of Wrong Planet. Follow me (Alex Plank) on Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/alexplank.bsky.social


JeremyNJ1984
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 9 Oct 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 496
Location: Central New Jersey

17 Jan 2012, 11:38 am

alex wrote:
This is definitely a big concern for sites like Wrong Planet.

The law would make it impossible from a logistical standpoint to manage any sort of large user generated forum site like this.



I am not to familiar with the specifics of the bill. How would it impact this site in particular? My understanding of the bill was that it was primarily aimed at Online piracy and protecting intellectual property rights? Just curious thats all.



alex
Developer
Developer

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,214
Location: Beverly Hills, CA

17 Jan 2012, 11:43 am

JeremyNJ1984 wrote:

I am not to familiar with the specifics of the bill. How would it impact this site in particular? My understanding of the bill was that it was primarily aimed at Online piracy and protecting intellectual property rights? Just curious thats all.


Here's an explanation:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/01/h ... ree-speech


_________________
I'm Alex Plank, the founder of Wrong Planet. Follow me (Alex Plank) on Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/alexplank.bsky.social


MakaylaTheAspie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jun 2011
Age: 27
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 14,565
Location: O'er the land of the so-called free and the home of the self-proclaimed brave. (Oregon)

17 Jan 2012, 11:55 am

JeremyNJ1984 wrote:
alex wrote:
This is definitely a big concern for sites like Wrong Planet.

The law would make it impossible from a logistical standpoint to manage any sort of large user generated forum site like this.



I am not to familiar with the specifics of the bill. How would it impact this site in particular? My understanding of the bill was that it was primarily aimed at Online piracy and protecting intellectual property rights? Just curious thats all.


It's pretty much like an instant ban to an entire website if they even once have any hint of not siting a single source. The government can actually control what goes on the internet and what comes off. It won't be personal anymore, and sites like Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Tumblr, and DevianArt would be shut down for good.


_________________
Hi there! Please refer to me as Moss. Unable to change my username to reflect that change. Have a nice day. <3


JeremyNJ1984
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 9 Oct 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 496
Location: Central New Jersey

17 Jan 2012, 12:16 pm

alex wrote:
JeremyNJ1984 wrote:

I am not to familiar with the specifics of the bill. How would it impact this site in particular? My understanding of the bill was that it was primarily aimed at Online piracy and protecting intellectual property rights? Just curious thats all.


Here's an explanation:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/01/h ... ree-speech



Thanks for the information...It will probably get watered down and vetoed. Seems the opposition is pretty powerful and somewhat bipartisan.



visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

17 Jan 2012, 1:12 pm

I am pleased to see that some of the hyperbole has been ratcheted down. (Though not all, it seems).

Free speech advocates on the internet will, however, still have to reconcile themselves to how they propose to accommodate the fact that there is no free speech interest in ideas owned by others. The Supreme Court was crystal clear that copyrights, trademarks and broadcast rights are an accpetable infringement of free expression. It is all well and good to complain that current legislative proposals go to far (and they do).

But it is not acceptable to argue that the internet can or should be a place in which the interests of the owners of copyrights and broadcast licensees can be eradicated.

I have yet to see an opponent of SOPA and PIPA acknowledge those rights and propose how they can be respected.


_________________
--James


pezar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2008
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,432

17 Jan 2012, 2:38 pm

WP Internet Boycott: DO NOT use the internet on the 18th to show solidarity! Don't use computers, smart phones, or any other means of internet access. Keep your computers and phones turned off all day. Unplug in protest. Pass it around.

Visagrunt, maybe what we could do is set up a clearinghouse, like ASCAP is for musicians, so that the biggest sites could pay fees to it for "blanket use" of copyrighted material.