willow wrote:
public buses, okay. I can see that, maybe. but school buses should have them as a standard feature. some children have no choice but to ride the bus.
I'm originally from the Czech Republic. There are 2 types of public buses there - intercity (CSAD) and city buses. The legal speed limit within cities is 80 Km/hr, as I recall, but the buses in Prage rarely get above 50 km/hr (or roughly 30 mph). Both from the standpoint of common sense and someone who has taken advanced physics classes, people and objects don't easily become deadly projectiles at those speeds. Now, on CSAD I would disagree. The legal limit on the highway is 140 km/hr (or roughly 80 mph) and people routinely exceed that. Usually you're "with traffic" around 190 km/hr. Those buses should have seatbelts and storage racks. They don't, but I am bringing this up to make the point that there are fairly obvious instances in which public buses <i>should</i> have seatbelts, even though it may be an impractical suggestion for intra-city transportation.
I don't think that there is an excuse for school buses. If children live in a big enough city to have public transportation, they probably either walk or use public transportation (from my experience in NY and Czech). Aside from field trips, some school buses go to pretty rural areas to pick up and drop off kids, so they can get up to a pretty high speed just in day-to-day operations. I think it's pretty inexcusable to have children ride without seatbelts given all the data we have about safety.