Page 3 of 3 [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

janicka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,911
Location: Mountain Paradise

30 Nov 2006, 5:09 pm

Tequila wrote:
Encourage people to give up smoking, become healthier or become less of a drain on the environment by all means. I don't have a problem with that. It's when people are directly penalised, punished and ostracised for a completely legal lifestyle choice that I have to disagree. :)


ITA



Mitch8817
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,881
Location: Victoria, Australia

30 Nov 2006, 7:48 pm

>>The argument that anything is automatically good is dangerous.<<

What everybody needs to understand is that good and bad are a completely different thing from legal and illegal. Sure, they may tie in in some cases, but more often than not will leave many dissatisfied.


_________________
"Pray...NOW!" -Auron, before Bushido attack


nirrti_rachelle
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2005
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,302
Location: The Dirty South

01 Dec 2006, 2:56 am

Remnant wrote:
There must be frogs who leave the water when is getting hot while the other frogs think they are crazy for leaving such a warm and comfortable place.

A lot of our problems are with people who think that we are crazy when we warn them that something's going on.


Oh yeah, I can already smell aroma of barbequed frog legs right now.

You think it's coincidental that the same companies giving a big "F-U" to their employees' rights are the ones shipping most of the good jobs overseas and laying off workers left and right? There's a good reason why they're leaving us mostly with low-wage crap jobs that have us a paycheck away from homelessness. It's to keep us in line by making us more dependant on them so we'll be too afraid to speak up. After all, if they decide to let us go for sneezing too hard, where are we gonna go? We need their jobs to have a means to pay for those little extras like, say, eating.

So like farm animals, we can't run away because however miserable we feel in captivity, we're too domesticated to survive without the benevolence of the corporation who, like the farmer, will eventually slaughter us anyway.


_________________
"There is difference and there is power. And who holds the power decides the meaning of the difference." --June Jordan


ljbouchard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,278
Location: Rochester Minnesota

01 Dec 2006, 12:31 pm

But you forget one thing, We the employee are also allowed to show as much loyalty to the employer that they show to us. I remember months back that there was an article on CNN about employers getting mad at employees who put their resume as available on sites such as Monster.com. There was a backlash toward the article to the effect that if the employer wants the employment contract to be at will, then the employee has the same right.

Employers would like it if the employee had no other option but that is not true in US society and I think there would be a huge backlash in the US if the government tried to set things up where the employer has the right to get rid of someone at will but the employee does not have that same right.


_________________
Louis J Bouchard
Rochester Minnesota

"Only when all those who surround you are different, do you truly belong."
---------------------------------------------------
Fred Tate Little Man Tate


Pyth
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 194

01 Dec 2006, 12:36 pm

O_O

I don't care if someone smokes at home, that's their right. Their right to look stupid, their right to ruin their respatory, nervous, and cuculitory systems.



ljbouchard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,278
Location: Rochester Minnesota

01 Dec 2006, 12:45 pm

But what is because their smoking at home costs your employer more money due to health issues that you lose your job because the employer cannot pay the costs and you too?


_________________
Louis J Bouchard
Rochester Minnesota

"Only when all those who surround you are different, do you truly belong."
---------------------------------------------------
Fred Tate Little Man Tate


Pyth
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 194

01 Dec 2006, 12:51 pm

ljbouchard wrote:
But what is because their smoking at home costs your employer more money due to health issues that you lose your job because the employer cannot pay the costs and you too?


((BTW, the O_O of mine was at the article not you, sorry))

Anyway, if they can't pay the costs, they shouldn't be smoking.

I suppose that's an acceptable reason for job loss, but only if it's utterly overwhelming.



janicka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,911
Location: Mountain Paradise

01 Dec 2006, 12:53 pm

ljbouchard wrote:
But what is because their smoking at home costs your employer more money due to health issues that you lose your job because the employer cannot pay the costs and you too?


I don't think that anyone is debating the societal costs of smoking. If someone wants to smoke, let them pay more for their insurance premium.

Also, just out of curiosity - did this guy even have health insurance?? A lot of these blue collar jobs don't even offer it, so the whole debate over health care costs could be moot.



RTSgamerFTW
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,410

01 Dec 2006, 1:07 pm

I NEED TO DROP NAPALM ON THE LAWN CARE COMPANY!! !! !



I AM THE 666


_________________
My sig pwns.


PenitentSpark
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 122
Location: on the internet

01 Dec 2006, 7:16 pm

The reason they fired him was because the company has to pay his health care insurance, and smokers on average cost more.



diseased
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 870
Location: Victoria, BC

01 Dec 2006, 10:09 pm

If the governments of Canada, the US and Europe had an ounce of sense and were truly committed to getting people to stop smoking, they'd subsidise smoking-cessation measures.
In light of the fact that they have not, this whole 'Stop smoking cuz Uncle Sam says it's bad' is just lip-service. They're still in the pockets of the tobacco industry. Business as usual.



Remnant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2005
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,750

02 Dec 2006, 4:54 pm

PenitentSpark wrote:
The reason they fired him was because the company has to pay his health care insurance, and smokers on average cost more.


Not that they had any business firing him anyway, but the reason that he had the high nicotine levels was because he was using nicotine patches to try to stop smoking.



Xenon
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2006
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,476
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

02 Dec 2006, 8:30 pm

I work Monday to Friday, 8:00 am to 4:30 pm, with a 30-minute lunch break. I usually arrive about 7:45 am and am off company property by 4:35 most days. What I do when I'm not at work and not on company property is none of my employer's business. Thank goodness the Canadian Human Rights Commission has ruled that workplace drug testing is an unwarranted invasion of privacy unless someone works in a profession where public safety may be an issue (eg, long-distance truck driver).


_________________
"Some mornings it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps." -- Emo Philips


parts
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2005
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,579
Location: New England

02 Dec 2006, 8:56 pm

Xenon wrote:
I work Monday to Friday, 8:00 am to 4:30 pm, with a 30-minute lunch break. I usually arrive about 7:45 am and am off company property by 4:35 most days. What I do when I'm not at work and not on company property is none of my employer's business. Thank goodness the Canadian Human Rights Commission has ruled that workplace drug testing is an unwarranted invasion of privacy unless someone works in a profession where public safety may be an issue (eg, long-distance truck driver).


I feel the same way unfortunately in the US drug testing for employment is becoming very common. The company I worked for before starting my own business now requires it.


_________________
"Strange is your language and I have no decoder Why don't make your intentions clear..." Peter Gabriel