ruveyn wrote:
b9 wrote:
Quote:
Ray Bradbury died at 91....
i can not determine the significance of the stated fact that he was 91 when he died.
is it some sort of esoteric coincidence or something?
i doubt he would have been able to produce any significant scripts at (or beyond) that age anyway, so the loss is merely token i guess.
Ray had a good run.
was he also an athlete? i do not know much about him.
ruveyn wrote:
He was not cut down in the flower of his youth.
i am not sure what that means i am sorry.
ruveyn wrote:
I wouldn't mind living to 91 in good health.
why is the number "91" important? why not 92 or 93 or any other number?
ruveyn wrote:
If I did I might get to see great grand children which is one of my ambitions.
well i hope that you do get to witness your great grand children because it must be fascinating to see the evolution of your genes out to the 3rd generation.
but it still does not explain why 91 is an important enough number to be included in the title of the thread.