Board index › General Discussion › News and Current Events

Funny the things our news forgets to mention...

Page 1 of 1 [ 12 posts ] 

Previous topic | Next topic

John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

10 Dec 2012, 12:48 am

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-12-07/us/35669807_1_nuclear-test-nuclear-weapons-nevada-national-security-site

WASHINGTON: The United States said Thursday it has conducted a "subcritical" nuclear test at an underground site to study the behavior of nuclear materials without triggering an atomic explosion.

The test, conducted Wednesday in Nevada, aims to gather scientific data that will "provide crucial information to maintain the safety and effectiveness of the nation's nuclear weapons," the Energy Department said in a statement.


_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown

"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud


Evinceo
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 13 Apr 2012
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 392

10 Dec 2012, 1:17 am

How is this news?



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

10 Dec 2012, 1:27 am

Is there anything overly dangerous in this test? If not then I have to agree with Evinco.



Kyton
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 44

10 Dec 2012, 2:18 am

i think you make the mistake of believing that testing anything nuclear is dangerous, this is not the case.



Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,471
Location: Aux Arcs

10 Dec 2012, 9:40 am

So it's 100% safe???Yeah,sure.



Canaspie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Aug 2012
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,228
Location: Ontario, Canada

10 Dec 2012, 10:43 am

Do you also assume that all nuclear power plants are dangerous?



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

10 Dec 2012, 11:50 am

Inuyasha wrote:
Is there anything overly dangerous in this test? If not then I have to agree with Evinco.


Certainly less dangerous than the underground nuclear explosions.

ruveyn



Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,471
Location: Aux Arcs

10 Dec 2012, 12:33 pm

Canaspie wrote:
Do you also assume that all nuclear power plants are dangerous?


Yes I do,3 -mile island,Chernobyl,the tsunami in Japan.
The one near me got a fine awhile back for some sort of overheating violation.
The people operating them are imperfect beings so mistakes can and will be made to the detriment of all.



Sylkat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,425

11 Dec 2012, 12:35 am

So true....

Someone always takes a shortcut, tries to save money, covers up a 'little' mistake, or management tries to get too much done with too few personnel.

Sylkat



MakaylaTheAspie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jun 2011
Age: 27
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 14,565
Location: O'er the land of the so-called free and the home of the self-proclaimed brave. (Oregon)

11 Dec 2012, 12:45 pm

Nuclear weaponry, safe?

That's an oxymoron if I ever heard one. :roll:


_________________
Hi there! Please refer to me as Moss. Unable to change my username to reflect that change. Have a nice day. <3


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

11 Dec 2012, 4:24 pm

Misslizard wrote:
Canaspie wrote:
Do you also assume that all nuclear power plants are dangerous?


Yes I do,3 -mile island,Chernobyl,the tsunami in Japan.
The one near me got a fine awhile back for some sort of overheating violation.
The people operating them are imperfect beings so mistakes can and will be made to the detriment of all.


In all the cases mentioned the greatest danger came from mismanagement, not the nuclear technology per se.

In any case the newest designs are far safer than the ones that went haywire because of incompetent management and maintenance.

As far as underground nuclear explosions go, the leakage of radioactive material is barely detectable. Not to worry.

If above ground tests didn't kill us, surely below ground tests will not.

ruveyn



visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

11 Dec 2012, 4:33 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
Is there anything overly dangerous in this test? If not then I have to agree with Evinco.


I'm not sure that is the benchmark for newsworthiness.

After all, if we are going to stand up and complain about Iran and North Korea conducting research into nuclear fission technology, then I think it is crucial for us to understand the nature of research and testing that is going on in the existing nuclear states, and the ways in which that research and testing differs from that which we are complaining about in Iran and North Korea.

Was this test dangerous? I think not.

Would it be dangerous for "I'm-a-dinner-jacket" (thanks to Dara Ó Briain for that one) to claim "Our tests are pefectly fine so long as you are testing?" Probably moreso. So in that vein, I am just as happy to know what is going on. And that makes it newsworthy.


_________________
--James