Nestlé gets exclusive rights to the shape of KitKat

Page 1 of 1 [ 9 posts ] 

Beauty_pact
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2010
Age: 145
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,314
Location: Svíþjoð

02 Jan 2013, 11:46 pm

http://m.marketingmagazine.co.uk/articl ... le-Cadbury

Quote:
Nestlé has won the latest tit-for-tat trademark battle with rival Cadbury, after regulators overturned their original decision to allow rivals to make KitKat-shaped products.

The new ruling could have significant ramifications for the confectionery sector, as it means that rival chocolate brands will not be able to sell sweets, bakery products and biscuits in a four-fingered shape like the KitKat bar.

The trademark wrangle was unusual in that it was not centered on a dispute over a name, but over the shape of the KitKat bar.

Nestlé originally successfully registered the shape of a four-bar of KitKat chocolate in 2006.

But Cadbury applied to invalidate the registration on the basis that the shape of a chocolate bar was unlike, for example, a name, and was instead a generic thing that could not be monopolized by one company.

Originally, Cadbury won its appeal.

But now trademark regulators have overturned the original decision, after a fresh appeal from Nestlé.

Regulators said they had reached the new decision because they maintained that the four-fingered shape was now exclusively associated with Nestlé.

In particular, they ruled that as Nestlé had used that shape for so long and had provided evidence that the shape was exclusively associated with it across the whole of the European Union, or at least enough evidence to show this was likely, then it had educated the public that chocolate bars of that shape would always originate from Nestlé.

/.../


:roll: "Educated the public".... what utter nonsense.

Yep.... the system works. =_=



TheBicyclingGuitarist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,332

03 Jan 2013, 1:58 am

Gimme a break, gimme a break...


_________________
"When you ride over sharps, you get flats!"--The Bicycling Guitarist, May 13, 2008


Who_Am_I
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,632
Location: Australia

03 Jan 2013, 2:01 am

Pretty stupid for Cadbury to be quibbling over that when they trademarked a shade of purple.


_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I


JBlitzen
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 364
Location: Rochester, NY

04 Jan 2013, 2:55 am

Who_Am_I wrote:
Pretty stupid for Cadbury to be quibbling over that when they trademarked a shade of purple.

:lmao:



rapidroy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,411
Location: Ontario Canada

04 Jan 2013, 8:16 pm

Epic, now we know who invented the rectangle.



LennytheWicked
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Oct 2011
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 545

04 Jan 2013, 8:26 pm

I have a simple yet elegant solution!

Make eight fingers instead of four.



Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

04 Jan 2013, 9:26 pm

Easy marketing for competitors: "Tired of being limited to a measly FOUR chocolate bars?! !"


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


ianorlin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 756

05 Jan 2013, 12:28 pm

Wait aren't kit kats several trapezoidal prisms joined together. This just seems to show how stupid intellectual property law has become.



Jedi999
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 36

09 Jan 2013, 11:13 am

These companies can't think of anything better to do with their heaps of money.