ouinon wrote:
staremaster wrote:
Nobody wants to talk about it because there is no way to stop it, thats what I think.
Like the too-big-to-prosecute-banks, the 1% owning more than half the world's wealth, the giant-corporate-tax-dodgers, the lies that politicians and CEO's tell constantly and routinely, the drones killing hundreds of innocents in the Middle-East/Asia, the people held for years at Guanto without charges, etc, you mean? You might be ( depressingly ) correct.

Other possible reasons:
1 ) We're simply not surprised. We "knew" it all along. It's been "obvious". An awful lot of people already assumed that this was happening. This is how the world works now, and politicians almost always lie so ( previous ) denials meant nothing anyway. This "scoop" is merely confirmation, nothing to get excited about.
2 ) And also perhaps it simply isn't anything to get upset about, ( unlike drones killing hundreds of innocent men, women and children ) ... after all, isn't this the direction we've been going in for a while, exponentially increasing connectivity of data and people ( like molecules in a cell, or cells in a body ) across the globe en route for the planetary equivalent of a central nervous system?
Yes, the data may be used to stomp on/abuse/oppress/track people whose alleged "terrorism" consists of peaceful environmental activism, or whistleblowing, or making their protesting presence felt at Corporate junkets, etc etc etc ( ... and perhaps being gay or lesbian or homeschooling or wanting a homebirth or having an abortion ... or x, y, z if/whenever a govt comes to power who wants to stamp those things out ... ) ... but didn't that already happen anyway, most of the time/through out history, to people standing up to/against those in power?
The secrecy, the underhand way in which it has been carried out is repellent, distasteful, but normal; politicians and CEO's have been telling lies, lying and lying and lying and lying for so long now it's a surprise, almost disorientating, when they don't. We've become used to, increasingly adept/skilled at navigating a path through lies ... though it's emotionally exhausting and alienating, ... perhaps that's why they do it so much ... it "turns off" sustained/serious political engagement in the most potentially dangerous to the status-quo members of the population ( the truly honest ) ?
I wonder whether the earliest complex protein molecules experiencing incorporation into the structure called a cell, or early/slightly specialised cells "living"/replicating/reproducing in increasingly complex and long-term/permanent "clusters/groups" in the swamps/oceans felt anything biochemically resembling rage or excitement or indignation or shock or fear or resignation when the first proto/pseudo-central nervous systems began "gathering data" from all of them, etc, or reached a new stage of astonishingly efficient data-collection. Maybe to the various discrete elements/contents of a single cell DNA or RNA feels like a rapacious authoritarian power; maybe our cells experience the central nervous systems of our gastrointestinal system and brain as intolerably invasive intolerably omniscient, omnipresent omnipotent forces? ? ? Or maybe they get enough out of it to feel generally "satisfied" with the arrangement/relationship. :lol
ruveyn wrote:
What does PRISM stand for. I have not been able to locate that acronym using Google.
Don't know. Wiki and Guardian etc describe it as a "codename" so perhaps it's not an acronym ... just written bizarrely in capital letters? Would have to know who actually "made" the software/app/system. Apparently the company Palantir didn't. Perhaps the same lot as programmed "Boundless Informant"? Maybe it's an in-house product?
.