From the article:
Quote:
Meister says he used hand gestures to try to tell police he is deaf and was lawfully at the home.
The cops were having none of it. They "shot Taser darts into Mr. Meister, administered a number of painful electric shocks, struck him with fists and feet, and forcibly took him to the ground," he says in the complaint. Officers kicked and punched him in the back and stomach, choked and Tasered him, delivering "punishing shocks" and intentionally "burning his flesh," Meister claims.
I had originally been under the beleif that tasers were to be used only to gain control of a suspect so they could be restrained. Ever since the "don't tase me, bro" incident at UF in '07 it seems that getting control of someone isn't always enough. They want to use the taser to shut someone up or to punish them for putting the cops to the trouble of having to respond.
Quote:
"This incident occurred in substantial part because the HPD does not provide its officers the training and resources to serve people who are deaf or hard of hearing, including those who communicate primarily through American Sign Language," the lawsuit states.
Really, should it take specialized training to deal with the deaf??? Can't common sense ever take over?
The same thing applies to the dog shooting incident in Filer Idaho last week.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson