Court rules 9/11 cross can remain at museum

Page 1 of 1 [ 7 posts ] 

AntDog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Aug 2010
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,967
Location: Riding on a Dragon

29 Jul 2014, 7:18 pm

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/gro ... -1.1883174
A victory against the rewriting of our history.



Last edited by AntDog on 29 Jul 2014, 7:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

cathylynn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,045
Location: northeast US

29 Jul 2014, 7:31 pm

exactly what history are you talking about? separation of church and state? the court allowed the cross to remain by saying it isn't a religious symbol.



wowiexist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Nov 2013
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 660
Location: Dallas, TX

29 Jul 2014, 8:40 pm

Atheists need to pick their battles a little better if you ask me. It is not like a group of people went and put the cross up. It just happened to still be there after the incident happened.



khaoz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Apr 2013
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,940

30 Jul 2014, 1:09 pm

cathylynn wrote:
exactly what history are you talking about? separation of church and state? the court allowed the cross to remain by saying it isn't a religious symbol.



The guy who found the cross disagrees with the court.

?Faith won over atheism,? the retired Silecchia, who now lives in South Carolina, told the Daily News Monday. ?I?m kind of proud because that was my initial goal: to help ease the burden of humanity.

I think the court knows the truth too.



Dantac
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,672
Location: Florida

31 Jul 2014, 4:05 pm

I'm agnostic and to me this is a piece of architecture which is now of great historical significance. Just because it happens to look like a cross and people attach meaning to it that is religious is not a reason to call it a religious object.

Fact: It was not built AS a religious symbol. That alone makes these idiots trying to take it down lose their case and prove their imbecility to the world at large.



TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

31 Jul 2014, 4:24 pm

wowiexist wrote:
Atheists need to pick their battles a little better if you ask me. It is not like a group of people went and put the cross up. It just happened to still be there after the incident happened.


I'm an atheist and I agree with you. There are bigger fish to fry; things like the attempted subversion of science education by creationists trying to sneak creationism into science classes. Some "I" beam girders from the twin towers in the shape of a cross is of no/negligible importance in the scheme of things.


_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.


luanqibazao
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jan 2014
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 754
Location: Last booth, Akston's Diner

31 Jul 2014, 8:37 pm

A couple observations:

The buildings were made of steel girders joined at right angles. Finding, in the wreckage, two fragments of steel girders still joined at right angles is not "a sign from God" and I pity anybody who thinks it is. If God wanted to send a signal, why didn't he stop the attacks and prevent the murders of nearly 3000 innocent people?

A memorial to the 9/11 attacks is the last place, the least appropriate place on Earth, for any kind of shrine to religious faith.

I wouldn't have expended a lot of energy fighting this thing myself. Had a petition presented itself, though, I would have signed it without hesitation.