Elizabeth Edward's cancer has returned

Page 1 of 2 [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

jimservo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,964
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs

22 Mar 2007, 12:42 pm

From CNN:

Quote:
CHAPEL HILL, North Carolina (CNN) -- Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards said Thursday his wife's cancer has returned but his bid for the White House will go on.

"The campaign goes on," John Edwards said at a news conference outside the couple's home, contradicting earlier media reports to the contrary.

John Edwards said tests this week had shown his wife, Elizabeth, had cancer in a rib on her right side. He said the cancer is treatable but not curable.

"We are very optimistic about this," he said, noting that the tumor is small in size and has a "relatively minimal presence."

Elizabeth Edwards said she was "incredibly optimistic" and said her expectations about the future were unchanged.

"You can go cower in the corner and hide or you can go out there and stand up for what you believe in," John Edwards said. "We have no intentions of cowering in the corner."


(source link)

Regardless of where you stand on the political spectrum you stand this is most unfortunate news. I hope Mrs. Edwards recovers from this setback.

Cancer is a terrible thing, a bipartisan menace. It took the life of liberal writer Molly Ivans not too long ago, and this week took the life on conservative writer Cathy Seipp.



janicka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,911
Location: Mountain Paradise

22 Mar 2007, 2:15 pm

Yeah, it's really sad. I had a college prof once whose wife had been cured of breast cancer only to have it return in the bone. It's just a lot of misery before you die once that happens.



larsenjw92286
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,062
Location: Seattle, Washington

22 Mar 2007, 6:20 pm

Oh, that's who Elizabeth Edwards is!

Well, that's very sad, but I hope her health improves soon!


_________________
Jason Larsen
[email protected]


Apatura
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,332

22 Mar 2007, 6:30 pm

So sad :(.



larsenjw92286
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,062
Location: Seattle, Washington

22 Mar 2007, 6:45 pm

Absolutely!


_________________
Jason Larsen
[email protected]


jimservo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,964
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs

23 Mar 2007, 3:22 pm

Some conservative political partisans have criticized Senator Edwards decision to continue campaigning for President, which he revealed in his statement. I condemn this criticism utterly. It is horribly presumptuous to assume to know what is best for Edwards.

ADDENDUM: I have not heard these negative comments myself, and have heard several comments criticizing them. It is possible they are very much in the strong minority. Still, I find entire attack baseless and absurd and wanted to make it clear.



Last edited by jimservo on 23 Mar 2007, 3:25 pm, edited 2 times in total.

larsenjw92286
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,062
Location: Seattle, Washington

23 Mar 2007, 3:22 pm

I can't believe it!


_________________
Jason Larsen
[email protected]


janicka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,911
Location: Mountain Paradise

23 Mar 2007, 3:54 pm

Typical Conservative behavior - kick 'em while they're down.



jimservo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,964
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs

23 Mar 2007, 4:39 pm

Meh...I could point to dozens of examples of (worse, in any case) examples on the other side but what is the point? Nasty people exist on both sides, as well in the middle. Kind good hearted people exist exist all over the spectrum. What this particular example was likely a cheap example of partisan point scoring. It deserves to be condemned, and hence has been. But do not think that if a conservative official was faced with a similar official you not get the same type of nonsense. Unfortunately, this is a part of hyper-partisan society (or societies). Perhaps it is a myth to say there was a time when these kind of things did not happen, but one certainly wishes it did.

ADDENDUM: "Perhaps it is a myth to say there was a time when these kind of things did not happen, but one certainly wishes it did."

As in, a myth that that dirty politics did not occur in democratic/republican politics. It certainly may have not been as bad, or may have been worse at various times, but it has always existed. Here are an example before the information age:

Image

The man on the top is General and future President Zachary Taylor.



Last edited by jimservo on 23 Mar 2007, 5:25 pm, edited 3 times in total.

larsenjw92286
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,062
Location: Seattle, Washington

23 Mar 2007, 4:50 pm

Why not?


_________________
Jason Larsen
[email protected]


9CatMom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jan 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,403

25 Mar 2007, 9:33 am

Cancer is a horrible disease! We've lost way too many friends to various forms of cancer in recent years.



larsenjw92286
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,062
Location: Seattle, Washington

25 Mar 2007, 10:25 am

Is it ever?


_________________
Jason Larsen
[email protected]


jimservo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,964
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs

26 Mar 2007, 9:02 am

Quote:
Elizabeth Edwards:
Cancer took a lot away from us a few years ago. It took a year of my life and a lot of John's. I didn't want it to take this away not just from me but from those people who depend on our having the kind of president he would be.

Katie Couric:
Here you're staring at possible death...

Elizabeth Edwards:
Aren't we all though.

Katie Couric:
And you're thinking, "I don't want to deprive the country of having my husband lead us."

Elizabeth Edwards:
That would be my legacy wouldn't it, Katie. That I'd... that I'd... that I'd... that I'd taken out this fine man from the possibility of giving a great service. I mean, I don't want that to be my legacy.

Katie Couric:
Politics, as you know, can be a cynical business.

John Edwards:
No!

Katie Couric:
You didn't know that?

John Edwards:
Yeah, I was not aware of that.

Katie Couric:
Glad I... (laughter) I’m glad I could teach you something today. Some have suggested that you're capitalizing on this.

John Edwards:
Here's what I would say about that.

First of all, there's not a single person in America that should vote for me because Elizabeth has cancer. Not a one. If you're considering doing it, don't do it. Do not vote for us because you feel some sympathy or compassion for us. That would be an enormous mistake. The vote for the presidency is far too important for any of those things to influence it.

But, I think every single candidate for president, Republican and Democratic have lives, personal lives, that indicate something about what kind of human being they are. And I think it is a fair evaluation for America to engage in to look at what kind of human beings each of us are, and what kind of president we'd make.

Katie Couric:
Some people watching this would say, "I would put my family first always, and my job second." And you're doing the exact opposite. You're putting your work first, and your family second.

John Edwards:
But this is not work. Work is what I did as a lawyer. This is service. This is... this is a country that I love – both of us love, as much as we love our lives.

Katie Couric:
I guess some people would say that there's some middle ground. You don't have to necessarily stay at home and feel sorry for yourself, and do nothing. But, if given a finite – a possibly finite period of time on the planet – being on the campaign trail, away from my children, a lot of time, and sort of pursuing this goal, is not, necessarily, what I'd do.

John Edwards:
Well, but we all... we are all different, number one. Number two, we all have a finite period time, and the idea that we know what that finite period is, is a fantasy to begin with.

Elizabeth Edwards:
We learned that in ’96.

John Edwards:
As we learned in 1996, with our son. We don’t know what’s gonna happen. We don't know what's gonna happen tomorrow. We have to live today the best way we know how. And that's exactly what the two of us are doing. I do think, though, that we have to be very sensitive about the tension that exists between our wanting to serve our country, and our children.


(complete interview)

Hmm...I really hope that Fmr. Senator Edwards doesn't use this as a campaign issue. In the interview he says, "No one should vote for me because of" but in the weird way that sort of is emphasizing the fact. Didn't he do something like that in a previous campaign for Senate (I believe it was in regards to his son who died in tragic circumstances). He did the press conference and now this interview? I really hate to be this cynical and I certainly wasn't at first but this seems oddly pre-arranged.



larsenjw92286
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,062
Location: Seattle, Washington

26 Mar 2007, 10:10 am

Astonishing!


_________________
Jason Larsen
[email protected]


jimservo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,964
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs

04 Apr 2007, 2:05 pm

A rather unfortunate update:

Quote:
When you visit the John Edwards for President Web site, you're invited to send a sympathy note to the Edwardses. And tens of thousands of well wishers have done so since that heart-wrenching news conference two weeks ago at which Elizabeth Edwards courageously discussed her incurable cancer.

What those well wishers get in return -- e-mail messages soliciting contributions to Edwards's campaign.

Visitors to the Edwards site who choose to "send a note to Elizabeth and John" are first taken to a heartfelt letter from the candidate that was written the day after he learned that his wife's cancer had returned. Edwards thanks readers for their "prayers and wishes," vows that he and Elizabeth will "keep a positive attitude always look for the silver lining" and declares that "our campaign goes on and it goes on strongly."

Anyone who then chooses to send a note of sympathy to the Edwardses -- and, thus, provide his or her e-mail address -- automatically becomes part of the Edwards campaign's online e-mail database, a list that is crucial to any campaign's ability to raise vast amounts of money over the Internet.

If you sent a note to the Edwardses before the critical March 31 end-of-the-quarter fundraising deadline, you would have received frantic e-mail solicitations from the campaign, such as the one on March 28 from Edwards campaign manager David Bonior titled, "96 hours to show substance works." The solicitation asked for "$25, $50 or any amount you can afford to give."


(source, Washington Post)

I myself sent an email expressing sympathy, and got a email asking for campaign contributions. A most unfortunate move.



larsenjw92286
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,062
Location: Seattle, Washington

04 Apr 2007, 4:57 pm

That is so sad!

I thought you would know better!


_________________
Jason Larsen
[email protected]