Page 1 of 1 [ 10 posts ] 


what do you think of uterus transplants
great idea, more women can have kids that otherwise couldn't. :) 50%  50%  [ 6 ]
bad idea, too many people on earth as it is, too many orphans need parents :| 25%  25%  [ 3 ]
I dunno... :shrug: 8%  8%  [ 1 ]
I wanna nice yummy ice cream :chef: 17%  17%  [ 2 ]
Total votes : 12

auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,227
Location: the island of defective toy santas

09 Mar 2016, 5:53 pm

(clicky)first U.S. uterus transplant fails due to emergent complication
sad. :( pray for her please. or send good thoughts.
some would say uterine transplantation is a boon for women who can't otherwise have kids. others would say the world is overpopulated as it is and/or there are too many orphans who need parents. what do y'all think of this new medical way?



Yigeren
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,606
Location: United States

09 Mar 2016, 6:48 pm

I think that it's unnecessary, and I wouldn't want one if I needed it to have more children. I'd rather adopt. And I wouldn't want a surrogate, unless it was someone I knew well.

But other people can do as they please.



animalcrackers
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,207
Location: Somewhere

09 Mar 2016, 7:07 pm

I think they really need to put more money into researching how to grow complex organs using a person's own stem cells.

A uterus grown from a woman's own cells is much more likely to be successfully implanted and permanently integrated into her body than a donor uterus.

I think it's to each their own as far as reproduction and making children to raise from your own gametes versus adopting children who are already alive and in desperate need of parents. But I do wish there were more people who wanted to adopt children that are already here and parent-less.....as much as genetic heritage is a kind of link to someone (and can be special for some people....admittedly, I think it's kind of special, but that's probably only because I have such a powerful emotional connection to my parents -- without that emotional connection I expect I wouldn't care at all....because I also think:), it's certainly not the only kind of link and it is far from the most important one.


_________________
"Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving." -- Terry Pratchett, A Hat Full of Sky

Love transcends all.


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,227
Location: the island of defective toy santas

09 Mar 2016, 7:14 pm

^^^ the spiritual link IMHO is far more important. the kludgy aspect of the whole uterine transplant thing is that we still don't know how to hook up all the nerves properly so that it will work as an organic part of the body, all we can do is hook up the blood supply and the mechanics [ligaments and such knitting together] but it just hangs in there and provides basic life support to a gestation but doesn't behave like a normal uterus would in terms of delivering the infant, a C-section was required for delivery as the normal cervical function was absent.



animalcrackers
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,207
Location: Somewhere

09 Mar 2016, 7:54 pm

auntblabby wrote:
^^^ the spiritual link IMHO is far more important.


I completely agree. (For me, I think, the genetics is sort of a bonus thing....because I have a strong spiritual/emotional link with my parents, it is pretty cool that my genetics are formed from theirs....similar to having a concrete/physical object that reminds me of them.)

auntblabby wrote:
the kludgy aspect of the whole uterine transplant thing is that we still don't know how to hook up all the nerves properly so that it will work as an organic part of the body, all we can do is hook up the blood supply and the mechanics [ligaments and such knitting together] but it just hangs in there and provides basic life support to a gestation but doesn't behave like a normal uterus would in terms of delivering the infant, a C-section was required for delivery as the normal cervical function was absent.


Ah, that would be a problem even for a stem-cell-originated uterus, then.

I was just thinking about the risks of immune rejection.


_________________
"Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving." -- Terry Pratchett, A Hat Full of Sky

Love transcends all.


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,227
Location: the island of defective toy santas

09 Mar 2016, 7:59 pm

and normal intercourse also would not have been enough to make a pregnancy happen with the transplanted uterus, as an in vitro was planned to make that happen.



Edenthiel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2014
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,820
Location: S.F Bay Area

13 Mar 2016, 2:48 pm

My take on it is that from a pure parenting point of view, it is unnecessary. There are so many children who need parents. But if someone truly feels that they *need* to pass on their genetics because theirs are so far superior and are needed to ensure the survival of the human race, there are surrogate mothers who will carry the fertilized egg. That latter choice is by far the better one (compared to a uterine transplant) if the purpose is to have a viable, healthy child and minimize risk to both the mother(s) and child.

I see uterus transplants as more of an experiment, but possibly an important one in immune/autoimmune, organ transplant, and a few other fields of research.


_________________
“For small creatures such as we the vastness is bearable only through love.”
―Carl Sagan


Last edited by Edenthiel on 13 Mar 2016, 6:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,550
Location: Aux Arcs

13 Mar 2016, 2:53 pm

We need more people to become foster parents and adopt,everyone wants a baby when there are so many needy older kids.


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,227
Location: the island of defective toy santas

13 Mar 2016, 3:22 pm

she needs our prayers.



animalcrackers
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,207
Location: Somewhere

13 Mar 2016, 5:32 pm

Edenthiel wrote:
My take on it is that from a pure parenting point of view, it is unnecessary. There are so many children who need parents. But if someone truly feels that they *need* to pass on their genetics because theirs are so far superior and are needed to ensure the survival of the human race, there are surrogate mothers who will carry the fertilized egg. That latter choice is by far the better one if the purpose is to have a viable, healthy child and minimize risk to both the mother(s) and child.

I see uterus transplants as more of an experiment, but possibly an important one in immune/autoimmune, organ transplant, and a few other fields of research.


Unfortunately, surrogacy is illegal in many countries, and that complicates things.


_________________
"Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving." -- Terry Pratchett, A Hat Full of Sky

Love transcends all.