Kraichgauer wrote:
I don't know who's sleazier, Zimmerman selling the gun he used to deprive Trayvon Martin the rest of his life with, or the human jackal who will buy it.
One thing that still bothers me about the whole scenario (aside from death, etc.) is the fact this jerk was carrying around a weapon he wasn't qualified to carry in that situation. If he'd had proper training (or an ounce of brains) this likely would never have happened.
The 1st Amendment has been confirmed...he was carrying in a state that allowed this, with proper credentialing...the state of FL did have the "Castle" doctrine in place...etc. But what I don't understand is why there was no,"Special Permit" required. By "Special Permit" I mean that most states differentiate between private citizens carrying for their own protection, and people who wish to carry concealed because of "employment" requirements, such as carrying as a private detective, a paid payroll guard or other protection services.
Now I know Zimmerman was most likely NOT being paid as a "watch" person in his neighborhood, but I doubt the intention of the LAW was only to single out people who were being paid. I think instead the intent of the law was to differentiate between common citizens and those who, through their position, may be exposed to far more violence, than the average person.
Following this reasoning it seems either the watch group, or the state, should have ensured the proper training to avoid possible incidents such as this (neither of which were done). I believe both the state of FL and the watch group's lax policies are culpable.