nurseangela wrote:
Pardon me all of you, but I do believe Trump has a point, even though the debate would have been interesting ...
Yet he accepted the debate, and
then, somewhat conveniently (for him), "remembered" an excuse to back out of it.
Sorry, Angela, but Mr. Trump has yet to sufficiently demonstrate the intellectual capability of one who is fully aware of the collateral effects of his actions - much less, one who is sufficiently aware of the salient facts of responsibility in being a member of the global community to lead the most powerful nation in the world.
As far as I'm concerned, Mr. Trump's only redeeming feature is his support of the right of the people to keep and bear arms. If he can guarantee that any sane person with cash-in-hand, and no criminal record can walk into a gun shop and make any purchase therein, then he has my vote.
Otherwise, it's Mr. Sanders (I've changed my mind about casting my vote for Mrs. Clinton).
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.