Pre-trial detention creates worse outcomes

Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ] 

beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

25 Jul 2016, 10:06 am

If you can't afford bail, then you will be less able to collect evidence, find and talk to your lawyer, and do things that would make it more likely for a judge to give you leniency:

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc ... es/491975/

This creates a disparity for the poor.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


Dillogic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,339

25 Jul 2016, 10:18 am

Bail should be based on your income; like a fixed percentage.

(I don't like the idea of bail. It kinda hits "innocent till proven guilty" over the head, really. Now, if there's a good deal of evidence supplied that will guarantee a conviction (beyond reasonable doubt), then sure, put the person behind bars if the offense is serious enough, but otherwise? Nope, let them go without a fee.)



Edenthiel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2014
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,820
Location: S.F Bay Area

25 Jul 2016, 9:48 pm

Dillogic wrote:
Bail should be based on your income; like a fixed percentage.

(I don't like the idea of bail. It kinda hits "innocent till proven guilty" over the head, really. Now, if there's a good deal of evidence supplied that will guarantee a conviction (beyond reasonable doubt), then sure, put the person behind bars if the offense is serious enough, but otherwise? Nope, let them go without a fee.)


I agree. Either they are bad enough to require staying locked up until trial, or they aren't. Being able to pay a freedom fee until the trial makes a mockery of that idea.


_________________
“For small creatures such as we the vastness is bearable only through love.”
―Carl Sagan