LoveNotHate wrote:
I don't have much confidence in "real scientists".
I think they'll change their tune fast, if they could lose their funding.
Trump could go to them and say, "Well, you've proven global warming, great work, so no need to keep funding you for something we already know".
Their likely response would be: "Whoa, Whoa, Whoa, Whoa, Wait, Wait, Wait .. we can't be certain .. obviously additional research is needed .. this is just a hypothesis ... let's not jump to conclusions now".
As opposed to scientists working for big oil, whose findings are predetermined to support their employer's agenda? Or pseudoscientists like Ken Ham and his sideshow Noah's Ark? Or scientifically illiterate crackers in congress who bring a snowball to the senate floor to demonstrate how global warming is a hoax, or who call evolution a lie from the pit of Hell?
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer