Neil deGrasse Tyson: "'Star Trek' better than 'Star Wars'"

Page 1 of 3 [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Campin_Cat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2014
Age: 64
Gender: Female
Posts: 25,953
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.

13 Sep 2016, 8:10 am

http://www.businessinsider.com/neil-degrasse-tyson-star-trek-star-wars-2016-9

.....and Kirk was better than Picard.

I can't watch the video because of limited bandwidth----but, hopefully someone WILL, and let us know what he said.









_________________
White female; age 59; diagnosed Aspie.
I use caps for emphasis----I'm NOT angry or shouting. I use caps like others use italics, underline, or bold.
"What we know is a drop; what we don't know, is an ocean." (Sir Isaac Newton)


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

13 Sep 2016, 8:23 am

maybe the prequels :P



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

13 Sep 2016, 9:37 am

Campin_Cat wrote:
http://www.businessinsider.com/neil-degrasse-tyson-star-trek-star-wars-2016-9

.....and Kirk was better than Picard.

I can't watch the video because of limited bandwidth----but, hopefully someone WILL, and let us know what he said.


Cute brief comments. He said star wars made even less attempt than star trek to be scientifically accurate, but he did like the scene with the double star sunset in star wars( both asthetically and scientifically). He also said that within Star Trek he is "old school", and prefers Kirk to Piccard because Kirk could make decisions on the fly in a crises (a better character). Though he admits that the guy who plays Picard is a better actor.

All reasonable opinions IMHO.



Campin_Cat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2014
Age: 64
Gender: Female
Posts: 25,953
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.

14 Sep 2016, 3:26 am

Awww, thankyou so much, naturalplastic, for that report!!

Yeah, I agree with those opinions, as well.












_________________
White female; age 59; diagnosed Aspie.
I use caps for emphasis----I'm NOT angry or shouting. I use caps like others use italics, underline, or bold.
"What we know is a drop; what we don't know, is an ocean." (Sir Isaac Newton)


Dillogic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,339

14 Sep 2016, 5:39 am

DS9 is the best out of the lot IMO; I tend to like geopolitics and all the things that go with that, and DS9 had that in spades

Sisko feels more realistic too; he's my favorite captain



Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,550
Location: Aux Arcs

14 Sep 2016, 11:30 am

I prefer Star Trek over Star Wars.
My least fav Capt was Archer.No way would I give that guy a starship.


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

14 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm

While I can relate to scientific argument in favor of Star Trek over Star Wars...

... if it came down to a battle...

Image

Image

... the Trekkies would regret bringing a gun to a knife fight...



BaalChatzaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,050
Location: Monroe Twp. NJ

14 Sep 2016, 1:41 pm

My favorites were the reboot of Battle Star Gallactica and Firefly


_________________
Socrates' Last Words: I drank what!! !?????


Campin_Cat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2014
Age: 64
Gender: Female
Posts: 25,953
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.

14 Sep 2016, 5:42 pm

GGPViper wrote:
While I can relate to scientific argument in favor of Star Trek over Star Wars...

... if it came down to a battle...

... the Trekkies would regret bringing a gun to a knife fight...

Why would anyone regret bringing a gun, to a knife fight? Just curious.....

I can certainly see why someone would regret bringing a KNIFE to a GUN fight, but.....





_________________
White female; age 59; diagnosed Aspie.
I use caps for emphasis----I'm NOT angry or shouting. I use caps like others use italics, underline, or bold.
"What we know is a drop; what we don't know, is an ocean." (Sir Isaac Newton)


friedmacguffins
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,539

14 Sep 2016, 7:06 pm

Call me a conspiracy theorist, but I thought of both brands as propaganda, from a very young age. There are some interesting, occult-themed dissections, if you're into those.

Still, this is like debating which corporate rocker or too-big-to-jail cola is better. Does it have entertainment value, for you, and does your consumption of it cause you to be dysfunctional. Are you relevant enough to know what average people are talking about.



Dillogic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,339

14 Sep 2016, 7:38 pm

friedmacguffins wrote:
Call me a conspiracy theorist, but I thought of both brands as propaganda, from a very young age. There are some interesting, occult-themed dissections, if you're into those.


You're not.

Most works of fiction have a narrative that the author is pushing for. Some are better at hiding it than others.



friedmacguffins
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,539

14 Sep 2016, 7:59 pm

friedmacguffins wrote:
Call me a conspiracy theorist, but I thought of both brands as propaganda, from a very young age.

Dillogic wrote:
You're not.

Most works of fiction have a narrative that the author is pushing for. Some are better at hiding it than others.


One way to think of sci-fi, is a sort of caricature. The author is viewing presentday people and social situations, in terms of logical extremes. So, in the ordinary sense, you have republics, rebels, representation via delegates, warlike, logical, acquisitive, and intuitive people.

But, in the extraordinary sense, yes, I am discussing a conspiracy theory.

In the words of cosmic, secular humanists, all the spiritual matters of the cosmos have a materialistic explanation.

As such, the creators are said to be involved in exopolitics, in a literal and not speculative way.

In that line of discussion, both series might be considered scientific -- a psa for disclosure, which some call the Externalization of the Hierarchy.

I respect that the claim is considered paranormal, so am treating it as fringe. :|



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

14 Sep 2016, 9:40 pm

Campin_Cat wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
While I can relate to scientific argument in favor of Star Trek over Star Wars...

... if it came down to a battle...

... the Trekkies would regret bringing a gun to a knife fight...

Why would anyone regret bringing a gun, to a knife fight? Just curious.....

I can certainly see why someone would regret bringing a KNIFE to a GUN fight, but.....


He must have had a dyslexic moment and meant "knife to a gun fight".

But he also forgot that the whole point of phasers is that they are adjustable. Dial up from "stun" to "kill" and they will kill at a much greater range (like a hand gun) than can a light saber...so THERE!

Indeed turned to kill a phaser would become "the gun" brought to the sword fight if the user was pitted against an opponet with a light saber.

BTW: a phaser can be dialed to a whole range of settings. Apparently including to levels lower than "stun".

In one episode Spock and Kirk and the crew beam down to the mystery planet phasers drawn. Spock announces "reports are in that this planet is inhabited sole by attractive young women". Kirk sternly orders "then turn your phasers to 'caress'".

Okay that was not in the TV show, but in the MAD magazine spoof of Star Trek I read when I was a kid. But it mades sense to me. :D



GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

15 Sep 2016, 1:02 am

naturalplastic wrote:
Campin_Cat wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
While I can relate to scientific argument in favor of Star Trek over Star Wars...

... if it came down to a battle...

... the Trekkies would regret bringing a gun to a knife fight...

Why would anyone regret bringing a gun, to a knife fight? Just curious.....

I can certainly see why someone would regret bringing a KNIFE to a GUN fight, but.....

He must have had a dyslexic moment and meant "knife to a gun fight".

Nope...



... QED...



luan78zao
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 490
Location: Under a cat

15 Sep 2016, 1:19 am

Of course it is. Is this even an issue?


_________________
"We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission – which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force." – Ayn Rand


Adamantium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2013
Age: 1026
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,863
Location: Erehwon

15 Sep 2016, 8:58 am

GGPViper wrote:
While I can relate to scientific argument in favor of Star Trek over Star Wars...

... if it came down to a battle...

Image

Image

... the Trekkies would regret bringing a gun to a knife fight...


Not at all.

As anyone who watched the original series knows, Kirk dealt with that situation in the person of Gary Mitchell in "Where No Man Has Gone Before" and when confronted by the powers of the Platonians in "Plato's stepchildren."

Faced with Sith and Jedi, Kirk would just get McCoy to cook up a hypospray loaded with midichlorians or kironide and then deliver a beatdown to the sith or other smug "I brought magic to a knife and gun fight" type.


_________________
Don't believe the gender note under my avatar. A WP bug means I can't fix it.