U.S. Supreme Court to hear autism education case
Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ]
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York
QuantumChemist wrote:
I have a friend who reads the Denver Post regularly and she clued me in on this article. It could have a major impact on members in the USA still in K-12.
link:http://www.denverpost.com/2016/09/29/supreme-court-douglas-county-student-disabilities-case/
link:http://www.denverpost.com/2016/09/29/supreme-court-douglas-county-student-disabilities-case/
It will
by Gary Myerson Autism Rights Attorney
Quote:
Last week, parents and teachers of children with disabilities applauded a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that held, with force and specificity, that students with autism and other disabilities must receive an education plan that gives them a fighting chance to succeed.
The court's Endrew F. decision immediately affects millions of students and their families, with school districts already in the thick of their annual rite of developing Individualized Education Programs, as required under the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for a unanimous court, found that school districts must address each student's unique needs and capacity to make progress — "appropriately ambitious" as weighed against their unique circumstances.
Wrote Justice Roberts: "When all is said and done, a student offered an educational program providing ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all … receiving instruction that aims so low would be tantamount to ‘sitting idly ... awaiting the time when they were old enough to “drop out.” ’ ”
The court's Endrew F. decision immediately affects millions of students and their families, with school districts already in the thick of their annual rite of developing Individualized Education Programs, as required under the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for a unanimous court, found that school districts must address each student's unique needs and capacity to make progress — "appropriately ambitious" as weighed against their unique circumstances.
Wrote Justice Roberts: "When all is said and done, a student offered an educational program providing ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all … receiving instruction that aims so low would be tantamount to ‘sitting idly ... awaiting the time when they were old enough to “drop out.” ’ ”
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
ASPartOfMe wrote:
QuantumChemist wrote:
I have a friend who reads the Denver Post regularly and she clued me in on this article. It could have a major impact on members in the USA still in K-12.
link:http://www.denverpost.com/2016/09/29/supreme-court-douglas-county-student-disabilities-case/
link:http://www.denverpost.com/2016/09/29/supreme-court-douglas-county-student-disabilities-case/
It will
by Gary Myerson Autism Rights Attorney
Quote:
Last week, parents and teachers of children with disabilities applauded a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that held, with force and specificity, that students with autism and other disabilities must receive an education plan that gives them a fighting chance to succeed.
The court's Endrew F. decision immediately affects millions of students and their families, with school districts already in the thick of their annual rite of developing Individualized Education Programs, as required under the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for a unanimous court, found that school districts must address each student's unique needs and capacity to make progress — "appropriately ambitious" as weighed against their unique circumstances.
Wrote Justice Roberts: "When all is said and done, a student offered an educational program providing ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all … receiving instruction that aims so low would be tantamount to ‘sitting idly ... awaiting the time when they were old enough to “drop out.” ’ ”
The court's Endrew F. decision immediately affects millions of students and their families, with school districts already in the thick of their annual rite of developing Individualized Education Programs, as required under the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for a unanimous court, found that school districts must address each student's unique needs and capacity to make progress — "appropriately ambitious" as weighed against their unique circumstances.
Wrote Justice Roberts: "When all is said and done, a student offered an educational program providing ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all … receiving instruction that aims so low would be tantamount to ‘sitting idly ... awaiting the time when they were old enough to “drop out.” ’ ”
As with his Obamacare decision, Roberts sometimes happily surprises me.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ]
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Having Autism |
11 Jul 2026, 11:01 pm |
| Autism influencers on IG, X, TikTok, etc. |
15 Jul 2026, 3:36 am |
