Trump involved in Money Laundering for Russians

Post Reply New Topic

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8K6-cEAJZlE

My one and only problem with this line of discussion, is that all govt and business activities are called criminal acts, in an informal context. It is a common, anarchist line of discussion, in which taxation is theft, imprisonment is kidnapping, and war is mass murder.

Spurious, political rhetoric, not intended to be taken seriously --
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WJyN3udu1I
Parental warning. Don't do what the singer says.

Either, they can do nothing right, or they can do nothing wrong. Is there a functional difference, between transferring funds, in private, or laundering them, to be intellectually-honest.

Many accusations made by the Nazi's were objectively-true. But, they were describing middle class mannerisms, in a bad light.

The leftist libels are also divisive, even when they would reserve the same privileges for themselves, but under a kinder name.

Oopsie, I posted the wrong video



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jJ8wt6nokY

Bloomberg
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles ... at-bayrock

It's a long read. Trump' s best defense looks like his habitual willful ignorance and relentless avarice.

He's not involved in 'money laundering'. This is silly. Is there any illegal activity that, according to those losers in the Democratic Party, he is NOT guilty of?

Oh yes he is.



Adultery?

Actually, he is not guilty of putting mustard on his burgers.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAvq12Sa3VE

Considering the 24/7 saturation of Trump obsession everywhere, they're probably running low on material. Maybe they'll manage to get over it some eventually. As for the OP, they've made it clear they think posts like yours are made by Russian spies.

In a long distance relationship with Stefan Molyneux? "Give unto Ceaser what is his."-Jesus Christ

In a long distance relationship with Stefan Molyneux?

And what parts of what the Nazis had to say about other groups of people were objectively true, pray tell?

This ought to be good...

Do you hate the First Amendment as much as Trump does?



Either paid Russian trolls, or people who are extremely naive. The internet is saturated with both types.

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles ... at-bayrock

The Donald belongs in prison.

Maybe it is Stefan Molyneux.

If he has Jewish family, it is possible. Regardless, I wouldn't consider it an insult.




They sit down, to a Sabbath dinner, in nice clothes. There is some silverware, and a roast is cooking. A govt agent is prowling the neighborhood, smelling the air, and notices the Jewish house has food. He starts pounding on the door. So, the family has to hide everything and dresses down. Objectively speaking, this film had been made by the Nazis, themselves. Here is what they have said about themselves, in their own propaganda. Is the agent really breaking up some den of vice? It looks like a nice, dignified house, they are describing.

It's bad, only in the light that they have taken it from others.

Other accusations involved their investment, not in a doomsday machine. Not in moral vices, necessarily. Just that they invest is considered a form of rent seeking. Rent seeking is supposed to be wrong. They show financial preference, to their own families and social institutions, which is put in a bad light. Inheritances are made out to be seditious.

Regardless of which video was intended to be shown, leftist and rightist interests, in our time, use the same methods against eachother, up to and including internment and forced service. There are extreme examples, on both sides, as politics always tends toward logical extremes, the punchier it gets. It's just called something different, when you do it.

Trump has specifically said that he has structured his business dealings, for the maximum, legal tax advantages, and, has publicly dealt with foreign countries, whether or not we consider them to be ethical. As a matter of specious reasoning, we can say that these are all illegal acts.

It requires you not to believe in such a thing as sanctity, sanctity of society, the state, and personal privacy. If you want to be objective and abstract, so there are no such things as morals or politics or dignity, you can then drag those things through the dirt.

I can use anything. Works just like mad libs. You can turn the characters on the back of a cereal box, or Chucky Cheese, into some social justice narrative. That's all we're doing. I'm so used to it, by now, I thought the association between Trump and Nazi's was intentional, as per Godwin's Law.

Last edited by friedmacguffins on 24 Jun 2017, 12:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

I know this is isn’t the section where people get general help with autism. Some should consider it very triggering. I think, it is something constructive, to know that people will treat you better or worse, based on racial, religious, or political affiliation . If you want to teach people what is normal and how to act normal, here’s what is usually happening – even when people don’t admit to it. People play politics, in public and in private.

Molyneaux’s socially-conservative brand of anarchism is inoffensive to me, personally. He is basically telling you to be polite and that the institution of govt itself has inherent flaws, regardless of which you side you take.

This was just as clear and concise as I expected it to be.