Vladimir Putin Denies 2016 Election Hacking Allegations
AnonymousAnonymous
Veteran
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 76,306
Location: Portland, Oregon
_________________
Silly NTs, I have Aspergers, and having Aspergers is gr-r-reat!
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York
Wikipedia still claims the Pope is Catholic.
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
No Russians interfered in the US election.
The Democrat National Committee's (Russian-owned) IT firm Crowdstrike made up the Russian hacker story, to distract from all the incriminating Hillary campaign emails being posted by Wikileaks, then refused to allow the FBI to examine the servers to confirm it, because they didn't want the world to know what they were really up to. McCaffee IT security has since debunked the Crowdstrike story, saying no evidence of Russian hacking exists. Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has maintained all along that emails he posted were obtained from a leak INSIDE the DNC, not from hackers of any kind.
The Obama-appointed heads of 4 (not 17) intel agencies, along with Obama's National Intelligence Advisor Susan Rice then concocted the Russian collusion story to discredit Trump (Rice keeping spreadsheets of Trump Campaign phone calls [wiretapping] for more than a year, while "unmasking" names of Trump associates in order to sow suspicion), even though Obama's Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and Obama's FBI Director James Comey BOTH admit there is no actual evidence of any such thing.
The Leftist Mainstream Media (which Wikileaks proved to be in bed with the Democrat Party during the election) continues to spout this utterly unsubstantiated Fake News without a single shred of evidence to back it up, while ignoring Hillary's collusion with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and Tim Kaine to rig the Democrat primary against Bernie Sanders.
Tim Kaine was head of the Democrat National Committee. After being contacted by Hillary Clinton, Tim Kaine stepped down from that position, and recommended Hillary's BFF Debbie Wasserman-Schultz for his job. DNC emails posted by Wilileaks PROVE that Wasserman-Schultz actively conspired to prevent Bernie Sanders from winning the Democrat nomination. A Stanford University study found that it was mathematically IMPOSSIBLE for Hillary Clinton to have won the Democrat Primary without voter fraud.
There was definitely election-tampering going on - by Crooked Hillary - but you'll never hear that from the MSM Propaganda Machine.
_________________
"I don't mean to sound bitter, cynical or cruel - but I am, so that's how it comes out." - Bill Hicks
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
The Democrat National Committee's (Russian-owned) IT firm Crowdstrike made up the Russian hacker story, to distract from all the incriminating Hillary campaign emails being posted by Wikileaks, then refused to allow the FBI to examine the servers to confirm it, because they didn't want the world to know what they were really up to. McCaffee IT security has since debunked the Crowdstrike story, saying no evidence of Russian hacking exists. Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has maintained all along that emails he posted were obtained from a leak INSIDE the DNC, not from hackers of any kind.
The Obama-appointed heads of 4 (not 17) intel agencies, along with Obama's National Intelligence Advisor Susan Rice then concocted the Russian collusion story to discredit Trump (Rice keeping spreadsheets of Trump Campaign phone calls [wiretapping] for more than a year, while "unmasking" names of Trump associates in order to sow suspicion), even though Obama's Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and Obama's FBI Director James Comey BOTH admit there is no actual evidence of any such thing.
The Leftist Mainstream Media (which Wikileaks proved to be in bed with the Democrat Party during the election) continues to spout this utterly unsubstantiated Fake News without a single shred of evidence to back it up, while ignoring Hillary's collusion with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and Tim Kaine to rig the Democrat primary against Bernie Sanders.
Tim Kaine was head of the Democrat National Committee. After being contacted by Hillary Clinton, Tim Kaine stepped down from that position, and recommended Hillary's BFF Debbie Wasserman-Schultz for his job. DNC emails posted by Wilileaks PROVE that Wasserman-Schultz actively conspired to prevent Bernie Sanders from winning the Democrat nomination. A Stanford University study found that it was mathematically IMPOSSIBLE for Hillary Clinton to have won the Democrat Primary without voter fraud.
There was definitely election-tampering going on - by Crooked Hillary - but you'll never hear that from the MSM Propaganda Machine.
Why is Wikileaks in any way reliable? As I recall, Trump wanted to have Assange executed, till he helped out Trump's campaign.
And crooked Hilary? Trump ran Trump University, which was just a scam. He refused to pay workers and contractors, he's a tax cheat, and even stiffed hotels at the end of his stay. So, who's crooked? Seriously, I have yet to hear you guys on the Trump bandwagon explain any of Trump's misdeeds away.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
The Democrat National Committee's (Russian-owned) IT firm Crowdstrike made up the Russian hacker story, to distract from all the incriminating Hillary campaign emails being posted by Wikileaks, then refused to allow the FBI to examine the servers to confirm it, because they didn't want the world to know what they were really up to. McCaffee IT security has since debunked the Crowdstrike story, saying no evidence of Russian hacking exists. Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has maintained all along that emails he posted were obtained from a leak INSIDE the DNC, not from hackers of any kind.
The Obama-appointed heads of 4 (not 17) intel agencies, along with Obama's National Intelligence Advisor Susan Rice then concocted the Russian collusion story to discredit Trump (Rice keeping spreadsheets of Trump Campaign phone calls [wiretapping] for more than a year, while "unmasking" names of Trump associates in order to sow suspicion), even though Obama's Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and Obama's FBI Director James Comey BOTH admit there is no actual evidence of any such thing.
The Leftist Mainstream Media (which Wikileaks proved to be in bed with the Democrat Party during the election) continues to spout this utterly unsubstantiated Fake News without a single shred of evidence to back it up, while ignoring Hillary's collusion with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and Tim Kaine to rig the Democrat primary against Bernie Sanders.
Tim Kaine was head of the Democrat National Committee. After being contacted by Hillary Clinton, Tim Kaine stepped down from that position, and recommended Hillary's BFF Debbie Wasserman-Schultz for his job. DNC emails posted by Wilileaks PROVE that Wasserman-Schultz actively conspired to prevent Bernie Sanders from winning the Democrat nomination. A Stanford University study found that it was mathematically IMPOSSIBLE for Hillary Clinton to have won the Democrat Primary without voter fraud.
There was definitely election-tampering going on - by Crooked Hillary - but you'll never hear that from the MSM Propaganda Machine.
Why is Wikileaks in any way reliable? As I recall, Trump wanted to have Assange executed, till he helped out Trump's campaign.
And crooked Hilary? Trump ran Trump University, which was just a scam. He refused to pay workers and contractors, he's a tax cheat, and even stiffed hotels at the end of his stay. So, who's crooked? Seriously, I have yet to hear you guys on the Trump bandwagon explain any of Trump's misdeeds away.
I have: "it's fake news." It's the go to defense these days. As with most popular commonplaces it's simple, short and doesn't require critical thinking, evidence, or effort. It's the rhetorical equivalent of burying one's head in the sand.
