Men Arrested in Airport Terror Plot in New York City

Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ] 

jimservo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,964
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs

02 Jun 2007, 4:34 pm

Quote:
As first reported by NewsChannel4's Jonathan Dienst, three people were arrested and one other was being sought Saturday in connection to a plot to blow up jet-fuel lines at John F. Kennedy International Airport, officials said.

Four people have been charged. Three suspects are in custody: Russell Defreitas, Kareem Ibrihim and Abdul Kadir. Another suspect, Abdul Nur is still at large.

Defreitas is to be arrainged Saturday in Brooklyn on terror conspiracy charges...

"Given the nature of Buckeye business and the importance of this transportation network, we have an intense and ongoing communications relationship with the Port Authority, the New York City fire and police departments, the federal Department of Homeland Security and the FBI," he said.

Sources said the plot involved putting explosives inside the fuel pipeline but realized that "it was not technically feasible."

Officials said the plot may also have included plans to hit the JFK terminal buildings and aircraft, in addition to the fuel lines.

In discussing JFK airport as a target, Defreitas exulted over JFK airport’s symbolic importance, according to a U.S. Justice Department complaint:

"Anytime you hit Kennedy, it is the most hurtful thing to the United States. To hit John F. Kennedy, wow .... They love John F. Kennedy like he’s the man .... If you hit that, this whole country will be in mourning. It’s like you can kill the man twice. "

In a later recorded conversation with his coconspirators in May 2007, Defreitas compared the plot to attack JFK airport to the attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, stating, “even the Twin Towers can’t touch it,” adding that, “this can destroy the economy of America for some time.”


(source)

This is from the indictment.

Quote:
28. During the return drive from JFK, Defreitas discussed the extent of the damage they could cause. In particular, Defreitas predicted that the plot would result in the destruction of "the whole of Kennedy," that only a few people would escape and that, due to underground piping, part of Queens would explode.



alexbeetle
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,314
Location: beetle hole

02 Jun 2007, 6:06 pm

lesson being if you want to blow up JFK then plan a one-man mission and tell no-else about it


_________________
Any implied social connection is an artifact of the distance between my computer and yours.

It might look like I'm doing nothing, but at the cellular level I'm really quite busy.


postpaleo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2007
Age: 75
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,134
Location: North Mirage, Pennsyltucky

06 Jun 2007, 3:53 am

I can't be sure, I didn't or haven't caught the name of the pipeline or when it was put in place. It looked like, from the brief map of it I saw, one I worked on. It was close enough to the one I worked on to know it isn't the only one that follows that route. It comes to the surface in many spots. The latest experts on what they had planned are saying the end results of the plan are being greatly over played. Our infrastucture is venerable in a huge number of areas, it's just the way it is and I don't think a practical thing can be done about it. There are certian areas of it, that are more destructive then others and I do think better security is needed, but that was needed long before the current terrorist scare.

I think a couple of the major black outs were caused by squirrels. Now what part of that little lesson would make anyone think explosives would be needed to begin with?


_________________
Just enjoy what you do, as best you can, and let the dog out once in a while.


ahayes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Dec 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,506

06 Jun 2007, 4:58 am

The fuel would still require air, you'd only see explosions around the area where the bombs went off. Pipes in other locations would do little more than rupture and leak. It would be quite hazardous, but nowhere near as disastrous as projected in the article.



postpaleo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2007
Age: 75
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,134
Location: North Mirage, Pennsyltucky

06 Jun 2007, 7:20 am

The pros are even saying if the major fuel tanks at JFK were to go off, it would be contained. They are designed for that in mind.

Disruptive? Most certianly and the scare tactics would send most scurring back into thier freakin hidey holes, again. The speculaters will make a ton of money, again. They love this s**t. Lord only knows what country we'd be expected to invade this time.


_________________
Just enjoy what you do, as best you can, and let the dog out once in a while.