Hi guys (Utah, Blabby, et. al.). I'm going to chime in and be a real downer here.
Have any of you heard of "regulatory capture"? What it is, is the industry being regulated finds a way to take control of its government regulator. One popular method is via "user fees" - and a fine example of this is the FDA.
Previously, the FDA depended entirely on Congress to set its budget. Then, in the early 90s, User Fees were established. Under a series of laws drafted by drug company lawyers and lobbyists, and basically rubber stamped by a Congress too lazy to read, drug companies now pay the FDA to have their proposals assessed (proposals to sell drugs to treat conditions or diseases, based on testing they have done, which the Agency reviews).
With User Fees paying the Agency salaries, eventually the Agency comes under more and more pressure to cut corners and to ignore it when the firms do the same - so that it becomes little more than a subsidiary of the industry. (See recent article on extremely lax safety testing of the Gardasil vaccine, https://slate.com/health-and-science/20 ... afety.html as an example. No, I'm not an anti-vaxxer at all.) Other captured agencies would include EPA and the Patent and Trademark Office. Zinke is busy forcing the capture of an entire Cabinet Department, as another example. Similar horrors are happening at State, HHS, etc.
Regulatory capture basically destroys the enforcement arm of the executive branch. It replaces functional agencies with shams.
Meanwhile, with Citizens United - and with the plague of lobbyists we have in the US (a theme of DarthMetaKnight) - we have progressed to nearly complete legislative capture (of Congress). One entire political party is now beholden to wealthy donors to such an extent that it does not even pretend to serve the people or the Constitution, and the other party does nothing more than look at this and sigh.
Capture of the judicial branch is underway as we speak (type). Judgeships are being awarded to young, unqualified, dogmatic incompetents. (Edit in: the theft of Merrick Garland's judicial nomination by McConnell and Gorsuch is a blatant demonstration of this.)
Now, the problem is, once all three branches of the federal government are captured, who will implement the rule of law? Who will actually uphold the Constitution? That's what Shaub and Yates are concerned about - and Preet Bharara and others.
Mueller's strategy seems to be to set up the perps for prosecution at the State level, as a fallback. Let's hope it doesn't come to that, but it looks as though he is bringing relatively sparse indictments, reserving much of the criminal record so that it can be followed up on, and prosecuted, by the States if a presidential pardon is issued, or the Federal level investigation(s) are killed.
But make no mistake - the power brokers watched Watergate and learned from it, and we are now living the result.
_________________
"I believe you find life such a problem because you think there are the good people and the bad people," said the man. "You're wrong, of course. There are, always and only, the bad people, but some of them are on opposite sides."
-- Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!