U.S. agents fire tear gas as migrants try to breach border
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York
Migrant caravan: Mexico to deport group which stormed US border
The group were rounded up after trying to cross the border "violently" and "illegally" on Sunday, the ministry said in a statement.
Video footage shows dozens of people - including women and children - running towards the fence that separates the two countries near the city of Tijuana.
They were repelled by tear gas used by US border officers.
Mexico's interior ministry said all those who were identified as having tried to cross would be deported immediately.
It added that, "far from helping their objectives", the migrants' actions had violated the legal migration framework and could have led to a "serious incident".
Amid growing desperation on Sunday, a group of about 500 migrants - who had been taking part in a peaceful protest demanding to be allowed to cross - made a run for the border.
According to news agency AFP, a number managed to climb over a first fence. It was as they tried to cross a second, spike-topped wall that officials on the US side began throwing tear gas.
An AFP journalist saw the migrants - including mothers and children - trying to protect themselves from the gas, with some crying out that they only wanted to find a work and a better life in the US.
As a result of Sundays action, the US has also closed the border crossing near the Mexican border city of Tijuana to vehicles and pedestrians.
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
Per capita income or GDP?
_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!
"invasion"
it's basically nothing.
the richest nation the world has ever seen has the resources to treat these people with basic decency and allow them to process their asylum claim but they CHOOSE to do this.
how do you defend it?
_________________
הייתי צוללת עכשיו למים
הכי, הכי עמוקים
לא לשמוע כלום
לא לדעת כלום
וזה הכל אהובי, זה הכל.
Americans so sheltered and privileged they think this is what an invasion looks like.
_________________
Diagnoses: AS, Depression, General & Social Anxiety
I guess I just wasn't made for these times.
- Brian Wilson
Δυνατὰ δὲ οἱ προύχοντες πράσσουσι καὶ οἱ ἀσθενεῖς ξυγχωροῦσιν.
Those with power do what their power permits, and the weak can only acquiesce.
- Thucydides
Conservatism discourages thought, discussion, consensus, empathy, and hope.
"invasion"
it's basically nothing.
the richest nation the world has ever seen has the resources to treat these people with basic decency and allow them to process their asylum claim but they CHOOSE to do this.
how do you defend it?
What proof do they have that they're being politically persecuted?
I have not head anything that would qualify them for protection (asylum) from persecution.
Most seem to want a better life, and that doesn't qualify for asylum.
_________________
After a failure, the easiest thing to do is to blame someone else.
"invasion"
it's basically nothing.
the richest nation the world has ever seen has the resources to treat these people with basic decency and allow them to process their asylum claim but they CHOOSE to do this.
how do you defend it?
What proof do they have that they're being politically prosecuted?
I have not head anything that would qualify them for protection (asylum) from persecution.
Most seem to want a better life, and that doesn't qualify for asylum.
Given the fact that the U.S. is largely responsible for this mass exodus of people seeking a better life, how do you reconcile that attitude? Should we not be more compassionate?
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
This entire story is a perfect example of how the anti-American media cook up lies and distortions and frauds. And it shows how they in fact couldn't care less about "migrants," women, children, or anyone else. They have only one maniacal, hysterical obsession, and that's getting Trump.
How about some real reporting for a change:
Tear gas used once a month at border under Obama
DHS data shows deployments dating back years
The same tear-gas agent that the Trump administration is taking heat for deploying against a border mob this weekend is actually used fairly frequently — including more than once a month during the later years of President Barack Obama’s administration, according to Homeland Security data.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection has used 2-chlorobenzylidene malononitrile, or CS, since 2010, and deployed it 26 times in fiscal 2012 and 27 times in 2013. The use dropped after that, but was still deployed three times in 2016, Mr. Obama’s final full year in office.
Use of CS rose again in fiscal 2017, which was split between Mr. Obama and Mr. Trump, and reached 29 deployments in fiscal 2018, which ended two months ago, according to CBP data seen by The Washington Times.
Border authorities also use another agent, pepper spray, frequently — including a decade-high record of 151 instances in 2013, also under Mr. Obama. Pepper spray, officially known as Pava Capsaicin, was used 43 times in fiscal year 2018, according to the CBP numbers.
The data poses a challenge to the current anger over the Border Patrol’s use of tear gas Sunday to prevent a mob from busting through sections of old border fence in California.
Critics, including Latin American leaders, immigrant-rights advocates and congressional Democrats, have said use of tear gas is “un-American.”
“It’s horrifying to see tear gas used on mothers and young children as they seek refuge in the United States. That’s not what America should be,” said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat.
Other Democrats complained about threats of “deadly force” against the border incursions, which saw migrants punch through fencing, and launch rocks and bottles at agents who responded to stem the intrusion.
Brandon Judd, president of the National Border Patrol Council, took umbrage at the outrage, questioning where the critics were when tear gas was deployed under Mr. Obama.
“This policy that we use was an Obama-written policy and it was used in 2013 at the same port of entry,” he told CNN, wondering in particular about the intense media interest now versus then.
“The facts are, the policy written under President Obama allows us to use tear gas to disperse a crowd that was very dangerous,” he told the network.
Host Erin Burnett scoffed at Mr. Judd’s facts, saying the agents were using tear gas against women and children this weekend.
“The tear gas was not deployed at the children,” Mr. Judd countered, saying migrants were attempting to use them as human shields.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... -once-mon/
_________________
There Are Four Lights!
"invasion"
it's basically nothing.
the richest nation the world has ever seen has the resources to treat these people with basic decency and allow them to process their asylum claim but they CHOOSE to do this.
how do you defend it?
What proof do they have that they're being politically prosecuted?
I have not head anything that would qualify them for protection (asylum) from persecution.
Most seem to want a better life, and that doesn't qualify for asylum.
Given the fact that the U.S. is largely responsible for this mass exodus of people seeking a better life, how do you reconcile that attitude? Should we not be more compassionate?
How is the US responsible for this "mass exodus of people seeking a better life"?
_________________
After a failure, the easiest thing to do is to blame someone else.
"invasion"
it's basically nothing.
the richest nation the world has ever seen has the resources to treat these people with basic decency and allow them to process their asylum claim but they CHOOSE to do this.
how do you defend it?
What proof do they have that they're being politically prosecuted?
I have not head anything that would qualify them for protection (asylum) from persecution.
Most seem to want a better life, and that doesn't qualify for asylum.
Given the fact that the U.S. is largely responsible for this mass exodus of people seeking a better life, how do you reconcile that attitude? Should we not be more compassionate?
How is the US responsible for this "mass exodus of people seeking a better life"?
A Century of U.S. Intervention Created the Immigration Crisis
We Bear Responsibility for the Conditions in Honduras Causing Its People to Flee
The Violence Central American Migrants Are Fleeing Was Stoked by the US
"invasion"
it's basically nothing.
the richest nation the world has ever seen has the resources to treat these people with basic decency and allow them to process their asylum claim but they CHOOSE to do this.
how do you defend it?
What proof do they have that they're being politically prosecuted?
I have not head anything that would qualify them for protection (asylum) from persecution.
Most seem to want a better life, and that doesn't qualify for asylum.
Given the fact that the U.S. is largely responsible for this mass exodus of people seeking a better life, how do you reconcile that attitude? Should we not be more compassionate?
How is the US responsible for this "mass exodus of people seeking a better life"?
A Century of U.S. Intervention Created the Immigration Crisis
We Bear Responsibility for the Conditions in Honduras Causing Its People to Flee
The Violence Central American Migrants Are Fleeing Was Stoked by the US
These articles don't state what the US supposedly did that caused these people to flee.
Foreign aid caused this? We should end foreign aid?
_________________
After a failure, the easiest thing to do is to blame someone else.
Last edited by LoveNotHate on 27 Nov 2018, 8:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
"invasion"
it's basically nothing.
the richest nation the world has ever seen has the resources to treat these people with basic decency and allow them to process their asylum claim but they CHOOSE to do this.
how do you defend it?
What proof do they have that they're being politically prosecuted?
I have not head anything that would qualify them for protection (asylum) from persecution.
Most seem to want a better life, and that doesn't qualify for asylum.
Given the fact that the U.S. is largely responsible for this mass exodus of people seeking a better life, how do you reconcile that attitude? Should we not be more compassionate?
How is the US responsible for this "mass exodus of people seeking a better life"?
A Century of U.S. Intervention Created the Immigration Crisis
We Bear Responsibility for the Conditions in Honduras Causing Its People to Flee
The Violence Central American Migrants Are Fleeing Was Stoked by the US
These articles don't state what the US supposedly did that caused these people to flee.
I just rolled my eyes so far back in my head that I saw my brain.
