Trump's Thanksgiving is to Mr. Bone Saw, not to God

Page 3 of 6 [ 93 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,796
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

07 Dec 2018, 6:34 pm

JohnPowell wrote:
In reality.


Bizarro world is reality to those who live there.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

07 Dec 2018, 6:53 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
In reality.


Bizarro world is reality to those who live there.


No what I said is reality. In the MIC etc world, South Korea 'needs' the US. The whole world is in trouble and the US are the good guys trying to save everyone. That's bizarro world.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,796
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

07 Dec 2018, 7:06 pm

JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
In reality.


Bizarro world is reality to those who live there.


No what I said is reality. In the MIC etc world, South Korea 'needs' the US. The whole world is in trouble and the US are the good guys trying to save everyone. That's bizarro world.


America has often been wrong in it's foreign policy, but it's often been right as well.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

08 Dec 2018, 11:08 am

When was that then?


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,796
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

08 Dec 2018, 4:44 pm

JohnPowell wrote:
When was that then?


The Marshal Plan which rebuilt Europe after WWII was one example.
Putting German and Japanese war criminals on trial rather than punishing the civilian populations (which your country was gung ho to do following WWI - laying the groundwork for WWII).
Pressuring South Africa to do away with Apartheid is yet another.
I could go on and on all day.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

08 Dec 2018, 6:22 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
When was that then?


The Marshal Plan which rebuilt Europe after WWII was one example.
Putting German and Japanese war criminals on trial rather than punishing the civilian populations (which your country was gung ho to do following WWI - laying the groundwork for WWII).
Pressuring South Africa to do away with Apartheid is yet another.
I could go on and on all day.


The US screwed up Italy and Greece after and during WWII.
The US nukes two civilian cities. The worst crimes in history. Yeah it did lay the foundations for WWII.
The US supported apartheid in South Africa. It was them who were put under pressure to drop their support. They now support apartheid in Palestine.
Please do.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,796
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

08 Dec 2018, 9:42 pm

JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
When was that then?


The Marshal Plan which rebuilt Europe after WWII was one example.
Putting German and Japanese war criminals on trial rather than punishing the civilian populations (which your country was gung ho to do following WWI - laying the groundwork for WWII).
Pressuring South Africa to do away with Apartheid is yet another.
I could go on and on all day.


The US screwed up Italy and Greece after and during WWII.
The US nukes two civilian cities. The worst crimes in history. Yeah it did lay the foundations for WWII.
The US supported apartheid in South Africa. It was them who were put under pressure to drop their support. They now support apartheid in Palestine.
Please do.


I believe I've already stated that American foreign policy has been far from perfect, but those accomplishments and others can't be denied.
Britain and France were much more responsible for humiliating and crippling Germany than America was with the peace after WWI.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


PearlsofWisdom
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jan 2018
Gender: Female
Posts: 477

08 Dec 2018, 11:20 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Na, you've shown you criticise Trump for the same things Obama did. All I heard was you making excuses for Obama and blaming Bush.
Again you start the story in the middle. North Korea worked towards arming themselves because Bush put them on the 'axis of evil' and pulled out of a peace treaty.
The South Koreans and Kim want to make peace and work towards unification. Only the US is stopping that.
America's greatness? :lol: Destroying other countries isn't greatness. I never knew you supported a nationalist imperialist agenda. And you support pouring the third world into the US. Hardly going to help the "greatness".


North Korea has been the aggressor since the Korean War.
Again, though South Koreans would like unity someday, they certainly don't want it under the Kim dictatorship.
Sure, America has done some pretty lousy things. But my country is the sole super power (something which some Brits seem to feel resentment about, losing their world wide empire and all :twisted: ), something which Putin wants to bring down to take revenge for the Soviet Union's fall. Trust me, the last thing you want is a Russian dominated globe.


Pardon me, but if you think your country is the only sole superpower in the world, you have my sovereigns permission to back your own state funeral with added guess list ammendments, as unlike our governing states of democracy no one had ever shot down anyone in cold blood more than once, and had the guts to tell the tales of their bloody endeavours. We lost more Tommy's in the first world war due to misguided management and a call to arms when Europe was at war and paid the price dearly in the second. YOU, and others who think like you, should be ashamed of yourselves for thinking that the cost of human life is justified for the perils of war which was started by an evil twisted dictator who cowardly shot himself. He created a monster army that were responsible for the Jews and millions of others and the Red soviet army was another Imperial revolutionary one and we don't need yours or anyone's help in deciding which atomic pathway either Putins, or your world business doldrum leader is going to dream up next.
At least we don't use prised convoluted ideas to prise each other off the face of the earth and are dealing with humanities problems in a different light, than trying to bomb and argue our way out of it.
The empire will never be swallowed up whilst our ruling democracy speaks up for itself, come what May.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,796
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

09 Dec 2018, 1:36 am

PearlsofWisdom wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Na, you've shown you criticise Trump for the same things Obama did. All I heard was you making excuses for Obama and blaming Bush.
Again you start the story in the middle. North Korea worked towards arming themselves because Bush put them on the 'axis of evil' and pulled out of a peace treaty.
The South Koreans and Kim want to make peace and work towards unification. Only the US is stopping that.
America's greatness? :lol: Destroying other countries isn't greatness. I never knew you supported a nationalist imperialist agenda. And you support pouring the third world into the US. Hardly going to help the "greatness".


North Korea has been the aggressor since the Korean War.
Again, though South Koreans would like unity someday, they certainly don't want it under the Kim dictatorship.
Sure, America has done some pretty lousy things. But my country is the sole super power (something which some Brits seem to feel resentment about, losing their world wide empire and all :twisted: ), something which Putin wants to bring down to take revenge for the Soviet Union's fall. Trust me, the last thing you want is a Russian dominated globe.


Pardon me, but if you think your country is the only sole superpower in the world, you have my sovereigns permission to back your own state funeral with added guess list ammendments, as unlike our governing states of democracy no one had ever shot down anyone in cold blood more than once, and had the guts to tell the tales of their bloody endeavours. We lost more Tommy's in the first world war due to misguided management and a call to arms when Europe was at war and paid the price dearly in the second. YOU, and others who think like you, should be ashamed of yourselves for thinking that the cost of human life is justified for the perils of war which was started by an evil twisted dictator who cowardly shot himself. He created a monster army that were responsible for the Jews and millions of others and the Red soviet army was another Imperial revolutionary one and we don't need yours or anyone's help in deciding which atomic pathway either Putins, or your world business doldrum leader is going to dream up next.
At least we don't use prised convoluted ideas to prise each other off the face of the earth and are dealing with humanities problems in a different light, than trying to bomb and argue our way out of it.
The empire will never be swallowed up whilst our ruling democracy speaks up for itself, come what May.


Well, sorry for trampling all over your nationalistic feelings. :roll:


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,480
Location: Long Island, New York

09 Dec 2018, 4:51 pm

The Wooing of Jared Kushner: How the Saudis Got a Friend in the White House

Quote:
Senior American officials were worried. Since the early months of the Trump administration, Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and Middle East adviser, had been having private, informal conversations with Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the favorite son of Saudi Arabia’s king.

Given Mr. Kushner’s political inexperience, the private exchanges could make him susceptible to Saudi manipulation, said three former senior American officials. In an effort to tighten practices at the White House, a new chief of staff tried to reimpose longstanding procedures stipulating that National Security Council staff members should participate in all calls with foreign leaders.

But even with the restrictions in place, Mr. Kushner, 37, and Prince Mohammed, 33, kept chatting, according to three former White House officials and two others briefed by the Saudi royal court. In fact, they said, the two men were on a first-name basis, calling each other Jared and Mohammed in text messages and phone calls.

The exchanges continued even after the Oct. 2 killing of Jamal Khashoggi, the Saudi journalist who was ambushed and dismembered by Saudi agents, according to two former senior American officials and the two people briefed by the Saudis.

As the killing set off a firestorm around the world and American intelligence agencies concluded that it was ordered by Prince Mohammed, Mr. Kushner became the prince’s most important defender inside the White House, people familiar with its internal deliberations say.

Mr. Kushner’s support for Prince Mohammed in the moment of crisis is a striking demonstration of a singular bond that has helped draw President Trump into an embrace of Saudi Arabia as one of his most important international allies.

But the ties between Mr. Kushner and Prince Mohammed did not happen on their own. The prince and his advisers, eager to enlist American support for his hawkish policies in the region and for his own consolidation of power, cultivated the relationship with Mr. Kushner for more than two years, according to documents, emails and text messages reviewed by The New York Times.

A delegation of Saudis close to the prince visited the United States as early as the month Mr. Trump was elected, the documents show, and brought back a report identifying Mr. Kushner as a crucial focal point in the courtship of the new administration. He brought to the job scant knowledge about the region, a transactional mind-set and an intense focus on reaching a deal with the Palestinians that met Israel’s demands, the delegation noted.

Even then, before the inauguration, the Saudis were trying to position themselves as essential allies who could help the Trump administration fulfill its campaign pledges. In addition to offering to help resolve the dispute between Israel and the Palestinians, the Saudis offered hundreds of billions of dollars in deals to buy American weapons and invest in American infrastructure. Mr. Trump later announced versions of some of these items with great fanfare when he made his first foreign trip: to an Arab-Islamic summit in Riyadh, the Saudi capital. The Saudis had extended that invitation during the delegation’s November 2016 visit.

The inner circle is predominantly deal makers who lack familiarity with political customs and deep institutions, and they support Jared Kushner,” the Saudi delegation wrote of the incoming administration in a slide presentation obtained by the Lebanese newspaper Al Akhbar, which provided it to The Times. Several Americans who spoke with the delegation confirmed the slide presentation’s accounts of the discussions.

The courtship of Mr. Kushner appears to have worked.

Only a few months after Mr. Trump moved into the White House, Mr. Kushner was inquiring about the Saudi royal succession process and whether the United States could influence it, raising fears among senior officials that he sought to help Prince Mohammed, who was not yet the crown prince, vault ahead in the line for the throne, two former senior White House officials said. American diplomats and intelligence officials feared that the Trump administration might be seen as playing favorites in the delicate internal politics of the Saudi royal family, the officials said.

(After publication, a senior White House official said in a statement: “Implications that Jared inquired about the possibility of influencing the Saudi royal succession process are false.”

Bending protocol, Mr. Kushner arranged for Prince Mohammed, often referred to by his initials as M.B.S., to receive the kind of treatment usually reserved for heads of state, with photographs and news media coverage, according to a person involved in the arrangements. It appears to have been the first face-to-face meeting between Mr. Kushner and the prince, but Mr. Kushner raised eyebrows by telling others in the White House that he and Prince Mohammed had already spoken several times before, two people at the event recalled.

“The relationship between Jared Kushner and Mohammed bin Salman constitutes the foundation of the Trump policy not just toward Saudi Arabia but toward the region,” said Martin Indyk, a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and a former Middle East envoy. The administration’s reliance on the Saudis in the peace process, its support for the kingdom’s feud with Qatar, an American ally, and its backing of the Saudi-led intervention in Yemen, he said, all grew out of “that bromance.”

But the Arab rulers of the oil-rich Persian Gulf mainly figured in Mr. Kushner’s life as investors in American real estate, the Kushner family business.

So Tom Barrack, a Lebanese-American real estate investor with close ties to both Mr. Trump and the Gulf rulers, set out during the campaign to introduce Mr. Kushner to his associates as a useful ally.

“You will love him and he agrees with our agenda!” Mr. Barrack wrote in May 2016 in an email to the Emirati ambassador in Washington, Youssef Otaiba.

Mr. Otaiba soon positioned himself as an informal adviser on the region to Mr. Kushner.

“Thanks to you, I am in constant contact with Jared and that has been extremely helpful,” Mr. Otaiba wrote to Mr. Barrack in the first months after Mr. Trump took office.
The Emirati ambassador was also eagerly promoting Prince Mohammed. Since the prince’s aging father had taken the throne in 2015, the Emiratis were betting heavily on the prince as their preferred contender in the succession struggles within the Saudi royal family.

“MBS is incredibly impressive,” Mr. Otaiba wrote Mr. Barrack in June 2016, as they tried to arrange meetings between the prince and the Trump campaign.

The month after the American election, the de facto ruler of the United Arab Emirates — Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed of Abu Dhabi — delivered a similar message when he made an unannounced trip to New York for a meeting with Mr. Kushner and others about the Israeli-Palestinian peace process.

While speaking with Mr. Kushner, the Emirati prince also recommended Prince Mohammed of Saudi Arabia as a promising young leader, according to a person familiar with their conversations.

Mr. Kushner seemed impressed. The meeting had been arranged in part by Rick Gerson, a hedge fund manager who was close to Mr. Kushner and to the Emirati crown prince. After the encounter, Mr. Gerson sent a message to the Emirati crown prince about his success in winning over Mr. Kushner.

“I promise you this will be the start of a special and historic relationship,” Mr. Gerson wrote, in a text message.
On the eve of the inauguration, Mr. Gerson wrote to the Emirati crown prince again.

“You have a true friend in the White House,” Mr. Gerson wrote, recounting a visit with Mr. Kushner before Mr. Kushner departed for Washington.

The emails with Ambassador Otaiba and the text messages with Mr. Gerson were provided to The Times by people critical of Emirati foreign policies and authenticated by others with direct knowledge of their contents. Mr. Gerson declined to comment and the Emirati embassy did not respond to requests for comment.

Top aides to Saudi Arabia’s Prince Mohammed also met with Mr. Kushner on a trip to New York in November 2016, after the election.

The Saudi team included Musaad al-Aiban, a cabinet minister involved in economic planning and national security, and Khaled al-Falih, installed by the prince as minister of energy and chairman of the state oil company, according to executives who met with them and a person who was briefed on the meetings. Mr. Aiban did not respond to a request for comment, and Mr. Falih could not be reached for comment.

The delegation made special note of what it characterized as Mr. Kushner’s ignorance of Saudi Arabia.

Kushner made clear his lack of familiarity with the history of Saudi-American relations and he asked about its support for terrorism,” the team noted in the slide presentation prepared for Riyadh. “After the discussion, he expressed his satisfaction with what was explained about the Saudi role in fighting terrorism” and what the Saudis said was their international leadership in fighting Islamist extremism.
Mr. Kushner, the Saudi report said, also questioned the delegation’s motives, asking whether the group had always been interested in working with Mr. Trump. As a candidate, Mr. Trump had promised to ban Muslim immigrants from entering the United States and had singled out Saudi Arabia as a dangerous influence.

“Kushner wondered about Saudi Arabia’s desire for partnership and whether it came from opportunity or worry, and he wondered as well if it was specific to this American administration or whether it was presented to Hillary Clinton (for example: women driving),” read another slide, next to a photograph of Mr. Kushner.

But Mr. Kushner was clear about his own priorities, the report said. “The Israeli-Palestinian conflict was among the most important issues to draw Kushner’s attention,” the delegation reported, and therefore the best way to win him over.

“The Palestinian issue first: there is still no clear plan for the American administration toward the Middle East,” the delegation wrote, “except that the central interest is finding a historic solution to support the stability of Israel and solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.”

To cultivate ties with the Trump team, the Saudis had prepared a long list of initiatives that they said would help Mr. Trump deliver for his supporters.

Seizing on Mr. Trump’s campaign vows for the “extreme vetting” of immigrants, the Saudi delegation proposed “establishing an intelligence and data” exchange “to help the American administration carry out its strategy of investigating those requesting residency (extreme vetting),” according to an Arabic version of a presentation for the Trump team.

And the delegation pledged “high-level coordination with the new American administration” to help with “defeating extremist thought.”
Several of the Saudi proposals were evidently welcomed.

One was a “joint center to fight the ideology of extremism and terrorism.” President Trump helped inaugurate a Saudi version of the center on his trip to Riyadh the following May.

Another Saudi proposal outlined what the Trump administration later called “an Arab NATO.” In their presentation, the Saudis described it as an Islamic military coalition of tens of thousands of troops “ready when the president-elect wishes to deploy them.”

Other initiatives appeared timed to Mr. Trump’s first term in office, like proposals to spend $50 billion over four years on American defense contracts, to increase Saudi investment in the United States to $200 billion over four years, and to invest, with other Gulf states, up to $100 billion in American infrastructure.

And the delegation urged Mr. Trump to come to Saudi Arabia himself to “launch the initiatives as part of a historic welcome celebration.”

It is unclear how the delegation’s slide-show presentation to and about the Trump team were obtained by the Al Akhbar newspaper, which is sympathetic to the Iranian-backed Lebanese movement Hezbollah and Iran, an enemy of Saudi Arabia.

Several Americans identified in the presentation acknowledged meeting with the delegation and confirmed broad outlines of the discussions. The Times provided the documents and the names of delegation members to an official of the Saudi Embassy in Washington, who declined to comment.

Israel had long argued to American diplomats that Saudi Arabia’s influence in the region made it essential to any peace deal, and the Israelis were developing high hopes for Prince Mohammed because of his hawkish views toward Iran and his general iconoclasm (he would later make several statements, like affirming the Israeli “right” to land, that were notably more sympathetic to the Israeli position than those of other Saudi leaders.)
Within weeks of Mr. Trump’s move into the White House, Mr. Kushner had embraced the delegation’s proposal for the president to visit Riyadh, convinced by then that the alliance with Saudi Arabia would be crucial in his plans for the region, according to a person who discussed it with Mr. Kushner and a second person familiar with his plans.

The secretary of state at the time, Rex W. Tillerson, opposed the idea. It would link the administration too closely to Riyadh, these people said, giving up flexibility and leverage. Mr. Trump initially saw little benefit either, according to a person involved in his deliberations.

But by the time of the inauguration Mr. Kushner was already arguing that under the influence of Prince Mohammed, Saudi Arabia could play a pivotal role in advancing a Middle East peace deal, according to three people familiar with his thinking. That would be the president’s legacy, Mr. Kushner argued, according to a person involved in the discussions.

It was around the time of the White House visit in March 2017 that senior officials in the State Department and the Pentagon began to worry about the one-on-one communications between Prince Mohammed — who is known to favor the online messaging service WhatsApp — and Mr. Kushner. “There was a risk the Saudis were playing him,” one former White House official said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.

Two later face-to-face encounters with Mr. Kushner preceded key turning points in Prince Mohammed’s consolidation of power.

Shortly after Mr. Kushner visited Riyadh with the president in May 2017, Prince Mohammed orchestrated the ouster of his older cousin, Prince Mohammed bin Nayef, removing him from control of the Saudi Interior Ministry and replacing him as crown prince. Prince Mohammed also announced a Saudi-led blockade of its neighbor and rival Qatar, the host of a major American air base.
And days after Mr. Kushner made an unannounced visit to Riyadh in the fall of 2017, the crown prince summarily detained about 200 wealthy Saudis, including several of his royal cousins, in a Ritz-Carlton hotel in Riyadh.

After each play for power, President Trump publicly praised Prince Mohammed.

Since the uproar over Mr. Khashoggi’s killing, the Trump administration has acknowledged only one conversation between Mr. Kushner and Prince Mohammed: an Oct. 10 telephone call joined by John R. Bolton, the national security adviser. The Americans “asked for more details and for the Saudi government to be transparent in the investigation process,” the White House said in a statement.

But American officials and a Saudi briefed on their conversations said that Mr. Kushner and Prince Mohammed have continued to chat informally. According to the Saudi, Mr. Kushner has offered the crown prince advice about how to weather the storm, urging him to resolve his conflicts around the region and avoid further embarrassments.

Few of the Saudi promises have amounted to much. The effectiveness of the counterterrorism center in Riyadh remains doubtful. After offering $50 billion in new weapons contracts, the Saudis have signed only letters of interest or intent without any firm deals. After proposing to marshal up to $100 billion in investments in American infrastructure, the Saudis have announced an investment of only $20 billion.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

It is Autism Acceptance Month

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,796
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

09 Dec 2018, 9:40 pm

^^^
Kushner seems to have convinced his father-in-law that he's the smartest guy in the room. He even seems to have fallen for his own bull. Sad thing is, both Trump and he himself are delusional about his smarts.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

10 Dec 2018, 12:11 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
When was that then?


The Marshal Plan which rebuilt Europe after WWII was one example.
Putting German and Japanese war criminals on trial rather than punishing the civilian populations (which your country was gung ho to do following WWI - laying the groundwork for WWII).
Pressuring South Africa to do away with Apartheid is yet another.
I could go on and on all day.


The US screwed up Italy and Greece after and during WWII.
The US nukes two civilian cities. The worst crimes in history. Yeah it did lay the foundations for WWII.
The US supported apartheid in South Africa. It was them who were put under pressure to drop their support. They now support apartheid in Palestine.
Please do.


I believe I've already stated that American foreign policy has been far from perfect, but those accomplishments and others can't be denied.
Britain and France were much more responsible for humiliating and crippling Germany than America was with the peace after WWI.


WWII changed the game. Ever since then the US has been destroying the world. You can't admit that cause it's your country doing it.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,796
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

10 Dec 2018, 4:17 pm

JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
When was that then?


The Marshal Plan which rebuilt Europe after WWII was one example.
Putting German and Japanese war criminals on trial rather than punishing the civilian populations (which your country was gung ho to do following WWI - laying the groundwork for WWII).
Pressuring South Africa to do away with Apartheid is yet another.
I could go on and on all day.


The US screwed up Italy and Greece after and during WWII.
The US nukes two civilian cities. The worst crimes in history. Yeah it did lay the foundations for WWII.
The US supported apartheid in South Africa. It was them who were put under pressure to drop their support. They now support apartheid in Palestine.
Please do.


I believe I've already stated that American foreign policy has been far from perfect, but those accomplishments and others can't be denied.
Britain and France were much more responsible for humiliating and crippling Germany than America was with the peace after WWI.


WWII changed the game. Ever since then the US has been destroying the world. You can't admit that cause it's your country doing it.


I seem to remember that your country, and others, being rebuilt by the American Marshal Plan. Also, the reintroduction of democracy in the former Axis powers after the war can't be called a bad thing.
What good did British expansionism ever do the world?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


PearlsofWisdom
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jan 2018
Gender: Female
Posts: 477

10 Dec 2018, 6:43 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
When was that then?


The Marshal Plan which rebuilt Europe after WWII was one example.
Putting German and Japanese war criminals on trial rather than punishing the civilian populations (which your country was gung ho to do following WWI - laying the groundwork for WWII).
Pressuring South Africa to do away with Apartheid is yet another.
I could go on and on all day.


The US screwed up Italy and Greece after and during WWII.
The US nukes two civilian cities. The worst crimes in history. Yeah it did lay the foundations for WWII.
The US supported apartheid in South Africa. It was them who were put under pressure to drop their support. They now support apartheid in Palestine.
Please do.


I believe I've already stated that American foreign policy has been far from perfect, but those accomplishments and others can't be denied.
Britain and France were much more responsible for humiliating and crippling Germany than America was with the peace after WWI.


WWII changed the game. Ever since then the US has been destroying the world. You can't admit that cause it's your country doing it.


I seem to remember that your country, and others, being rebuilt by the American Marshal Plan. Also, the reintroduction of democracy in the former Axis powers after the war can't be called a bad thing.
What good did British expansionism ever do the world?


Read how the story of the poppy came to be worn on armistice and you will understand the sentiment, not the clean up or financial settlement, but the cause of the conflict.

I believe we are all going to find out that BTW, we are' All free thinking trading nationalists' who actually have human pride and do give a damn about our trade deals and people who live in the UK as well as funding offshore aid for World disasters that no other country seems to be equipped for when bigger countries in the world are advised to let other countries rot if they are a part of Europe or even trading with us. All Trump wants, is to put high trade tariff barriers on the countries he wants the oil and steel from and get his grubby hands on the export deals to expose himself as the Russian Putins Ogliarch part ally he fully intends to be.
The closing down of our factories and steel plants are through the investments with the Chinese consumer markets and he is rewarding his only cash cow with high tariffs and more high tariffs, getting rich off the backs of others is going to be your country's undoing one day.
Macron has now learned the hard way that he needs to consolidate tax cuts to let the working class able to feed their young families and improve wages.
All your current president has been found incapable of. Scrapping health care and keeping guns in schools for protection(for an infant child to arm him/herself) and segregating aid in poor districts blaming tree fire pollution on nature and then not having the decency to clean it up, whilst pulling out of climate change talks is certainly not the way to keep a friendly alliance going, his mistakes are going to cost you all dearly alright.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,796
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

10 Dec 2018, 8:48 pm

PearlsofWisdom wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
When was that then?


The Marshal Plan which rebuilt Europe after WWII was one example.
Putting German and Japanese war criminals on trial rather than punishing the civilian populations (which your country was gung ho to do following WWI - laying the groundwork for WWII).
Pressuring South Africa to do away with Apartheid is yet another.
I could go on and on all day.


The US screwed up Italy and Greece after and during WWII.
The US nukes two civilian cities. The worst crimes in history. Yeah it did lay the foundations for WWII.
The US supported apartheid in South Africa. It was them who were put under pressure to drop their support. They now support apartheid in Palestine.
Please do.


I believe I've already stated that American foreign policy has been far from perfect, but those accomplishments and others can't be denied.
Britain and France were much more responsible for humiliating and crippling Germany than America was with the peace after WWI.


WWII changed the game. Ever since then the US has been destroying the world. You can't admit that cause it's your country doing it.


I seem to remember that your country, and others, being rebuilt by the American Marshal Plan. Also, the reintroduction of democracy in the former Axis powers after the war can't be called a bad thing.
What good did British expansionism ever do the world?


Read how the story of the poppy came to be worn on armistice and you will understand the sentiment, not the clean up or financial settlement, but the cause of the conflict.

I believe we are all going to find out that BTW, we are' All free thinking trading nationalists' who actually have human pride and do give a damn about our trade deals and people who live in the UK as well as funding offshore aid for World disasters that no other country seems to be equipped for when bigger countries in the world are advised to let other countries rot if they are a part of Europe or even trading with us. All Trump wants, is to put high trade tariff barriers on the countries he wants the oil and steel from and get his grubby hands on the export deals to expose himself as the Russian Putins Ogliarch part ally he fully intends to be.
The closing down of our factories and steel plants are through the investments with the Chinese consumer markets and he is rewarding his only cash cow with high tariffs and more high tariffs, getting rich off the backs of others is going to be your country's undoing one day.
Macron has now learned the hard way that he needs to consolidate tax cuts to let the working class able to feed their young families and improve wages.
All your current president has been found incapable of. Scrapping health care and keeping guns in schools for protection(for an infant child to arm him/herself) and segregating aid in poor districts blaming tree fire pollution on nature and then not having the decency to clean it up, whilst pulling out of climate change talks is certainly not the way to keep a friendly alliance going, his mistakes are going to cost you all dearly alright.


I actually agree 100% with you about that orange mongoloid. It's with great shame I call Trump my President.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


PearlsofWisdom
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jan 2018
Gender: Female
Posts: 477

12 Dec 2018, 11:07 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
PearlsofWisdom wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
When was that then?


The Marshal Plan which rebuilt Europe after WWII was one example.
Putting German and Japanese war criminals on trial rather than punishing the civilian populations (which your country was gung ho to do following WWI - laying the groundwork for WWII).
Pressuring South Africa to do away with Apartheid is yet another.
I could go on and on all day.


The US screwed up Italy and Greece after and during WWII.
The US nukes two civilian cities. The worst crimes in history. Yeah it did lay the foundations for WWII.
The US supported apartheid in South Africa. It was them who were put under pressure to drop their support. They now support apartheid in Palestine.
Please do.


I believe I've already stated that American foreign policy has been far from perfect, but those accomplishments and others can't be denied.
Britain and France were much more responsible for humiliating and crippling Germany than America was with the peace after WWI.


WWII changed the game. Ever since then the US has been destroying the world. You can't admit that cause it's your country doing it.


I seem to remember that your country, and others, being rebuilt by the American Marshal Plan. Also, the reintroduction of democracy in the former Axis powers after the war can't be called a bad thing.
What good did British expansionism ever do the world?


Read how the story of the poppy came to be worn on armistice and you will understand the sentiment, not the clean up or financial settlement, but the cause of the conflict.

I believe we are all going to find out that BTW, we are' All free thinking trading nationalists' who actually have human pride and do give a damn about our trade deals and people who live in the UK as well as funding offshore aid for World disasters that no other country seems to be equipped for when bigger countries in the world are advised to let other countries rot if they are a part of Europe or even trading with us. All Trump wants, is to put high trade tariff barriers on the countries he wants the oil and steel from and get his grubby hands on the export deals to expose himself as the Russian Putins Ogliarch part ally he fully intends to be.
The closing down of our factories and steel plants are through the investments with the Chinese consumer markets and he is rewarding his only cash cow with high tariffs and more high tariffs, getting rich off the backs of others is going to be your country's undoing one day.
Macron has now learned the hard way that he needs to consolidate tax cuts to let the working class able to feed their young families and improve wages.
All your current president has been found incapable of. Scrapping health care and keeping guns in schools for protection(for an infant child to arm him/herself) and segregating aid in poor districts blaming tree fire pollution on nature and then not having the decency to clean it up, whilst pulling out of climate change talks is certainly not the way to keep a friendly alliance going, his mistakes are going to cost you all dearly alright.


I actually agree 100% with you about that orange mongoloid. It's with great shame I call Trump my President.


Just to draw holy breath after my last serious sermon, I would like to join in the giving and receiving of hands, with both the Orange Tabloids and the Blue Met, that no flag can put asunder.
We have our own conflict here, whereby unfortunately, there is almost always a human cost involved but greed can bring down any high ranking super state by power marching into wars no one wants, or is even capable of even knowing where is it the land lies. Even some ancestral ties cannot be broken.
We can accept any apology he wants to make, as long as he displays this act openly, like blending into succession to kissing the hand of God. (The Pope and some Royalty would approve). I'm certain he has pledged many allegiances in his time, and not just to arms. Long may any forthcoming alliance continue, and any mocking of our own democratic and world historic affairs, now cease. Like I said, there is no point trying to win a proud argument. What's done is done, and will probably carry on with more cumbersome details, it needs to be faced off, diplomatically.
Hopefully that will appease any future arguments.