Prenatal Vitamin Use With Risk for ASD in young siblings
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York
Meaning Maternal daily intake of prenatal vitamins during the first month of pregnancy appears to be associated with reductions in recurrence of autism in high-risk families; additional research is needed to confirm these results, to further investigate specific nutrients, and to inform public health recommendations for autism spectrum disorder prevention.
Maternal use of folic acid supplements has been inconsistently associated with reduced risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in the child. No study to date has examined this association in the context of ASD recurrence in high-risk families.
Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective cohort study analyzed data from a sample of children (n = 332) and their mothers (n = 305) enrolled in the MARBLES (Markers of Autism Risk in Babies: Learning Early Signs) study. Participants in the MARBLES study were recruited at the MIND Institute of the University of California, Davis and were primarily from families receiving services for children with ASD in the California Department of Developmental Services. In this sample, the younger siblings at high risk for ASD were born between December 1, 2006, and June 30, 2015, and completed a final clinical assessment within 6 months of their third birthday. Prenatal vitamin use during pregnancy was reported by mothers during telephone interviews. Data analysis for this study was conducted from January 1, 2017, to December 3, 2018.
Main Outcomes and Measures Autism spectrum disorder, other nontypical development (non-TD), and typical development (TD) were algorithmically defined according to Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule and Mullen Scales of Early Learning subscale scores.
Results After exclusions, the final sample comprised 241 younger siblings, of which 140 (58.1%) were male and 101 (41.9%) were female, with a mean (SD) age of 36.5 (1.6) months. Most mothers (231 [95.9%]) reported taking prenatal vitamins during pregnancy, but only 87 mothers (36.1%) met the recommendations to take prenatal vitamins in the 6 months before pregnancy. The prevalence of ASD was 14.1% (18) in children whose mothers took prenatal vitamins in the first month of pregnancy compared with 32.7% (37) in children whose mothers did not take prenatal vitamins during that time. Children whose mothers reported taking prenatal vitamins during the first month of pregnancy were less likely to receive an ASD diagnosis (adjusted relative risk [RR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.30-0.81) but not a non-TD 36-month outcome (adjusted RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.75-1.75) compared with children whose mothers reported not taking prenatal vitamins. Children in the former maternal prenatal vitamin group also had statistically significantly lower autism symptom severity (adjusted estimated difference, –0.60; 95% CI, –0.97 to –0.23) and higher cognitive scores (adjusted estimated difference, 7.1; 95% CI, 1.2-13.1).
Conclusions and Relevance Maternal prenatal vitamin intake during the first month of pregnancy may reduce ASD recurrence in siblings of children with ASD in high-risk families. Additional research is needed to confirm these results; to investigate dose thresholds, contributing nutrients, and biologic mechanisms of prenatal vitamins; and to inform public health recommendations for ASD prevention in affected families.
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
The title of the article seems to me to suggest that prenatal vitamins increase the risk of autism, while the actual conclusion is that they decrease the risk, as would be expected from previous studies. Prenatal vitamins are generally a good idea. The paper also states that taking them before pregnancy is even more helpful than just during pregnancy.
edit: on re-reading, I find that mothers taking prenatal vitamins during the first month of pregnancy had both lower risk of autism and less severe autism when it was present, than mothers who did not take prenatal vitamins in the first month (but did later). Of course since you never know you will be pregnant until you are pregnant, this suggests these women were taking the vitamins prior to becoming pregnant.
_________________
A finger in every pie.
Prenatal vitamins are a potent form of vitamins. Generally they require a prescription. In generally, a women will not recognize she is pregnant that early. So it might be taken by someone planning to get pregnant.
What is the difference between prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) prenatal vitamins? That’s the question many women who are planning a pregnancy, or who are already are pregnant, ask themselves and their doctors every day!
Prescription prenatal vitamins contain 1,000 micrograms (1 milligram) or more, while on the average, most OTCs contain only 400 micrograms (0.4 mg ) or less.
A quality prescription prenatal contains chelated iron. Chelation, the process of binding iron molecules to an amino acid, stabilizes iron so it is readily absorbed into the bloodstream while being gentle on the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Most OTC prenatal vitamins do not even list what kind of iron they contain!
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is an omega-3 essential fatty acid (EFA) that serves as a primary building block for the healthy development of the brain, eyes, cells, and nervous system.* There is concern, however, that DHA derived from large fish including shark and swordfish, contains contaminants such as mercury and PCBs. Prescription prenatal vitamins usually undergo a strict purification process that tests for these impurities before being released. Question is, how pure is the DHA from OTC prenatals?
Source: The Difference Between Prescription and OTC Prenatal Vitamins
_________________
Author of Practical Preparations for a Coronavirus Pandemic.
A very unique plan. As Dr. Paul Thompson wrote, "This is the very best paper on the virus I have ever seen."
