EzraS wrote:
Quote:
(CNN) UK grocery chain Waitrose has apologized after being accused of racism over the names of three chocolate ducklings.
The "Waitrose Trio of Chocolate Easter Ducklings" contains a white, milk and dark chocolate version, which were named "Fluffy," "Crispy" and "Ugly" respectively.
A Twitter user questioned why Waitrose had chosen to call the darkest duckling "Ugly."
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/04/09/uk/w ... index.htmlWell I suppose I would be curious why they chose ugly for the darkest one. I mean I saw something earlier where an ad was pulled because it was supposedly racist against asians, but it showed british people failing to eat a burger with chop sticks....so I thought that was ridiculous because if anything it just showed white people failing to eat with chop sticks while trying to eat a food you don't even use them for.
But I can see people being bothered by this duck thing, like why did they choose cute terms like crispy and fluffy for the lighter ones and 'ugly' for the darkest one...perhaps a cute name that fits with fluffy and crispy would have been more appropriate. I mean maybe you yourself don't care, but I mean I don't think I would want to hand the 'ugly' darkest colored duck of the bunch to a black kid as I think that would be kinda racially insensitive. Like I am curious why does only the darkest one have a negative name while the lighter ones are just cutesy names? I realize it is just candy ducks so its not a worldwide crisis but I mean how did the company not realize maybe that wasn't the best choice?
_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.