VegetableMan wrote:
Fnord wrote:
"When you cannot refute the message, attack the messenger", right boys?
The Confuser In Chief was caught displaying his ignorance (again), and all you can do is either point and laugh at those who call him out, or try to divert attention toward rumors and innuendo.
Pathetic. Who's refuting the message? A president, a politician, said something stupid! Oh, s**t! Call 60 minutes! We've got a major story here.
If you don't understand the point of my comment, fine. But don't attack me with a BS accusation. Of course Trump is an idiot, douche-bag, and totally incompetent. I've never denied that. I'm just sick of this f*****g nonsense. It's only empowering him. If you don't get that, well...I think that's pathetic!
Just watch the Democrats implode if they don't support Tulsi Gabbard and then scream about Russia again and then see someone even worse than Trump elected after that. It's hilarious how these people call us Trump lovers just for focusing on important matters.
_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"