Recent events in the news have highlighted the issue of people falsely claiming to be the victims of crimes. We here at WP may also see this among members who claim to not only be victims of crimes, but victims of social ostracism, repeatedly broken or continuously non-existent relationships, or government conspiracies.
Sometimes, it's hard to tell the difference between the truth and a fabricated story, even when the people claiming victimhood keep changing their stories -- what happened, when it happened, who did it, et cetera.
Believe it or not, there are people who study this problem, and who have come up with a few common features that all of these false victims seem to display. CNN posted a news article yesterday that provides some expert insight into this behavior.
Source Article: Why would anyone lie about being a victim of a crime?.
Quote:
One frequently cited study from 1994 found that a false report of rape appeared to serve three functions: providing an alibi, seeking revenge or obtaining attention and sympathy. A more recent study reached a similar conclusion. In 30 confirmed false allegation cases over 15 years involving different offenses, attention or sympathy was the most common motivating factor, followed by providing an alibi or profit, according to paper published in the 2012 in the Journal of Forensic Sciences.
So, with the most common motivation being a desire for attention or sympathy, the behavior is something like "Munchausen by Proxy", only without the proxy.