30 Sep 2019, 2:20 am
30 Sep 2019, 3:53 am
30 Sep 2019, 4:56 am
30 Sep 2019, 5:04 am
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
30 Sep 2019, 5:26 am
30 Sep 2019, 6:05 am
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,251
Location: the island of defective toy santas
30 Sep 2019, 6:17 am
30 Sep 2019, 6:27 am
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,251
Location: the island of defective toy santas
30 Sep 2019, 6:28 am
30 Sep 2019, 6:49 am
30 Sep 2019, 7:31 am
30 Sep 2019, 7:38 am
30 Sep 2019, 7:58 am
30 Sep 2019, 9:55 am
EzraS wrote:
beneficii wrote:
EzraS wrote:
beneficii wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Aren't there usually big consequences if it gets found out that underhanded dealings have been done? Isn't it being said that Trump is in for big consequences if he is found to be involved in underhanded dealings? Should that be viewed as trying to intimidate and threaten him? Or does it only go one way?
This would be like saying it would be OK for a mob boss to threaten a witness because if the witness got the truth out, then the mob boss would go to jail. But that's pretty much what Trump is, or wants to be, anyway. After all, I know Trump has used the term "rat" in the past to refer to people who talk to law enforcement:
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-c ... d=59862349
The way Trump talks, as well as the innuendos he uses, it's just like how a mob boss talks. And if a mob boss is stupid enough to publicly intimidate a witness, then the mob boss goes down.
That's obviously what I did not say. I said if a witness is found to be lying then there are big consequences. And it seems to me that several of the witnesses who have testified against Trump had already experienced big consequences for committing perjury.
The Inspector General said the complaint was "credible" and "urgent". He did not say that the whistleblower or other witnesses perjured themselves. You're making that up.
And none of the witnesses have testified yet, beyond the whistleblower complaint.
No I am not making up that previous witnesses against Trump have been convicted of perjury. What is it with you and Bill completely misreading my posts?
...At least the implication of what you wrote seemed to be that they had perjured about Trump! I believe they did not.
Trump was threatening the whistle-blower, as he was, IIRC, calling the whistle-blower's source " treasonous " and alluding to executing them!
When the Presiddent says something like this, IT IS A THREAT. Because he is the President!
_________________
Renal kidney failure, congestive heart failure, COPD. Can't really get up from a floor position unhelped anymore:-(.
One of the walking wounded ~ SMASHED DOWN by life and age, now prevented from even expressing myself! SOB.
" Oh, no! First you have to PROVE you deserve to go away to college! " ~ My mother, 1978 (the heyday of Andy Gibb and Player). I would still like to go.
My life destroyed by Thorazine and Mellaril - and rape - and the Psychiatric/Industrial Complex. SOB:-(! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !!
30 Sep 2019, 10:08 am
30 Sep 2019, 10:14 am
ASS-P wrote:
EzraS wrote:
beneficii wrote:
EzraS wrote:
beneficii wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Aren't there usually big consequences if it gets found out that underhanded dealings have been done? Isn't it being said that Trump is in for big consequences if he is found to be involved in underhanded dealings? Should that be viewed as trying to intimidate and threaten him? Or does it only go one way?
This would be like saying it would be OK for a mob boss to threaten a witness because if the witness got the truth out, then the mob boss would go to jail. But that's pretty much what Trump is, or wants to be, anyway. After all, I know Trump has used the term "rat" in the past to refer to people who talk to law enforcement:
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-c ... d=59862349
The way Trump talks, as well as the innuendos he uses, it's just like how a mob boss talks. And if a mob boss is stupid enough to publicly intimidate a witness, then the mob boss goes down.
That's obviously what I did not say. I said if a witness is found to be lying then there are big consequences. And it seems to me that several of the witnesses who have testified against Trump had already experienced big consequences for committing perjury.
The Inspector General said the complaint was "credible" and "urgent". He did not say that the whistleblower or other witnesses perjured themselves. You're making that up.
And none of the witnesses have testified yet, beyond the whistleblower complaint.
No I am not making up that previous witnesses against Trump have been convicted of perjury. What is it with you and Bill completely misreading my posts?
...At least the implication of what you wrote seemed to be that they had perjured about Trump! I believe they did not.
Trump was threatening the whistle-blower, as he was, IIRC, calling the whistle-blower's source " treasonous " and alluding to executing them!
When the Presiddent says something like this, IT IS A THREAT. Because he is the President!
...I...I tried to add so.eso.ething that won't go up. I lost a draft.
_________________
Renal kidney failure, congestive heart failure, COPD. Can't really get up from a floor position unhelped anymore:-(.
One of the walking wounded ~ SMASHED DOWN by life and age, now prevented from even expressing myself! SOB.
" Oh, no! First you have to PROVE you deserve to go away to college! " ~ My mother, 1978 (the heyday of Andy Gibb and Player). I would still like to go.
My life destroyed by Thorazine and Mellaril - and rape - and the Psychiatric/Industrial Complex. SOB:-(! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !!
