Another Trump Supporter threatening civil war
All I do is discuss and debate and give opinions like everyone else.
Basically what you and beneficii are asserting is that anything other than a democrat echo chamber is detrimental to the autism community.
Then rather than send traffic one way be more impartial...
So I am the one who is supposed to be more impartial, whereas you're not the lest bit impartial.
Is that supposed to be some sort of crime? Would you like it to be?
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,732
Location: Right over your left shoulder
All I do is discuss and debate and give opinions like everyone else.
Basically what you and beneficii are asserting is that anything other than a democrat echo chamber is detrimental to the autism community.
Then rather than send traffic one way be more impartial...
So I am the one who is supposed to be more impartial, whereas you're not the lest bit impartial.
Is that supposed to be some sort of crime? Would you like it to be?
No, it's just an indication that you're not as neutral as you insist.
_________________
there’s no both sidesing a genocide, either you're against it or you're condoning it
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う
All I do is discuss and debate and give opinions like everyone else.
Basically what you and beneficii are asserting is that anything other than a democrat echo chamber is detrimental to the autism community.
Then rather than send traffic one way be more impartial...
So I am the one who is supposed to be more impartial, whereas you're not the lest bit impartial.
Is that supposed to be some sort of crime? Would you like it to be?
No, it's just an indication that you're not as neutral as you insist.
What I said is that I am an individualist.
Also I recently agreed that I am a "Devil's Advocate":
In that case devil's advocate sounds spot on.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,732
Location: Right over your left shoulder
To be fair, it is very difficult to decipher devil's advocate posts, in the same way satire often fails to translate to text-only. I'm also still standing by my initial observation, since you do tend to be more consistently critical of certain parts of the political spectrum.
Out of curiosity, how much control do you express over the clothes you wear, generally speaking? I'm only curious from the perspective of 'expressed individualism' vs. 'ideological individualism'.
_________________
there’s no both sidesing a genocide, either you're against it or you're condoning it
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う
Out of curiosity, how much control do you express over the clothes you wear, generally speaking? I'm only curious from the perspective of 'expressed individualism' vs. 'ideological individualism'.
Well you know I'm not trying to be anything. Twisty suggested devil's advocate with that video, and I felt that video described how I operate. As far as me having said something about being neutral, I probably meant my feelings/emotions are neutral.
I pick my own clothes if that's what you're asking. And I pretty much wear the same outfit in varying colors every day. Today it's a navy hoodie, a burgundy long sleeve henley thermal shirt and khaki jogging pants. Tomorrow it might be the same hoodie in grey, shirt in blue and pants in black. Or whatever combination. I choose my clothes based on comfort.
All I do is discuss and debate and give opinions like everyone else.
Basically what you and beneficii are asserting is that anything other than a democrat echo chamber is detrimental to the autism community.
Then rather than send traffic one way be more impartial...
So I am the one who is supposed to be more impartial, whereas you're not the lest bit impartial.
Is that supposed to be some sort of crime? Would you like it to be?
No I suppose you are entitled to speak your mind
All I do is discuss and debate and give opinions like everyone else.
Basically what you and beneficii are asserting is that anything other than a democrat echo chamber is detrimental to the autism community.
Then rather than send traffic one way be more impartial...
So I am the one who is supposed to be more impartial, whereas you're not the lest bit impartial.
Is that supposed to be some sort of crime? Would you like it to be?
No I suppose you are entitled to speak your mind
For now at least.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,732
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Oh okay, then my drunken hypothesis was utter rubbish.
_________________
there’s no both sidesing a genocide, either you're against it or you're condoning it
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う
Oh okay, then my drunken hypothesis was utter rubbish.
Drunken hypothesis? Are vomit stains part of the equation?
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,732
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Oh okay, then my drunken hypothesis was utter rubbish.
Drunken hypothesis? Are vomit stains part of the equation?
I'm not a kid, I don't drink to the point I'm puking, ever.
_________________
there’s no both sidesing a genocide, either you're against it or you're condoning it
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う
Last edited by funeralxempire on 27 Oct 2019, 2:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Oh okay, then my drunken hypothesis was utter rubbish.
Drunken hypothesis? Are vomit stains part of the equation?
No, because you weren't here to irrumate.
I'm not a kid, I don't drink to the point I'm puking, ever.
Sorry, I misread. I was understood your hypothesis was about him being drunk while getting dressed.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,732
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Oh okay, then my drunken hypothesis was utter rubbish.
Drunken hypothesis? Are vomit stains part of the equation?
I'm not a kid, I don't drink to the point I'm puking, ever.
Sorry, I misread. I was understood your hypothesis was about him being drunk while getting dressed.
No worries, I'll edit it. I was out of bounds.
_________________
there’s no both sidesing a genocide, either you're against it or you're condoning it
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う
Even Ben Shapiro is now calling for civil war:
So what is this about the left being the violent ones or the left being just as bad?
Of course, right-wingers here will say, "But Kathy Griffin!11" while ignoring the fact that what she did met with nearly universal condemnation from the left as well as the right. But are the right-wingers going to condemn Ben Shapiro and the other right-wing commentators here? If not, then the 2 sides are NOT the same.
_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin
So what is this about the left being the violent ones or the left being just as bad?
Of course, right-wingers here will say, "But Kathy Griffin!11" while ignoring the fact that what she did met with nearly universal condemnation from the left as well as the right. But are the right-wingers going to condemn Ben Shapiro and the other right-wing commentators here? If not, then the 2 sides are NOT the same.
I'd like to see those clips in their context. The second one they showed looked like footage I've seen of liberals setting fires in the streets. Also I noticed that in some of the blurbs the footage was jumpy, the voices sounded distorted and and the words were out of sync with mouth movements. I really don't see how you can keep presenting a quasi news program like TYT with a straight face.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,823
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
So what is this about the left being the violent ones or the left being just as bad?
Of course, right-wingers here will say, "But Kathy Griffin!11" while ignoring the fact that what she did met with nearly universal condemnation from the left as well as the right. But are the right-wingers going to condemn Ben Shapiro and the other right-wing commentators here? If not, then the 2 sides are NOT the same.
I'd like to see those clips in their context. The second one they showed looked like footage I've seen of liberals setting fires in the streets. Also I noticed that in some of the blurbs the footage was jumpy, the voices sounded distorted and and the words were out of sync with mouth movements. I really don't see how you can keep presenting a quasi news program like TYT with a straight face.
It's not conceivable that right wingers could threaten violence?
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
MTG Says Trump Civil Trial Judge "Should Be Disrobed!" |
23 Feb 2024, 3:56 pm |
Civil suits related to insurrection |
17 Feb 2024, 2:29 am |
"Civil War" 2024 movie |
08 May 2024, 7:15 pm |
SCOTUS: Trump to stay on ballots |
06 Mar 2024, 2:18 pm |