The Hitler Card before Hitler?

Post Reply New Topic

Godwin's Law tells us that the longer an internet conversation continues, the more likely someone will play the Hitler card. So what I'm wondering is who was the go-to figure for cliched political comparisons before the H-man? This goes back before the internet, but would this have had to have been before 1939 or 1945?
The Hitler card is such a widespread cliche bc it's used by both sides (conservatives accusing statist liberals, liberals accusing nationalist conservatives), but I'm struggling to think of a comparable figure that either side could condemn the other for being similar to. Obviously this differs from place to place but the figures that come to mind for me would be the likes of Robespierre, George III (if you're American), Andrew Johnson, Napoleon, Lenin, Oliver Cromwell, Nero, Mary Queen of Scots etc.

Godwin's Law is specific to the Internet. There was no internet before Hitler, so I see no reason to expect an analogous meme for that time period.

According to Mike Godwin (the creator of the law)

In December 2015, Godwin commented on the Nazi and fascist comparisons being made by several articles about Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, saying: "If you're thoughtful about it and show some real awareness of history, go ahead and refer to Hitler when you talk about Trump, or any other politician. In August 2017, Godwin made similar remarks on social networking websites Facebook and Twitter with respect to the two previous days' Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, endorsing and encouraging efforts to compare its alt-right organizers to Nazis.

In October 2018, Godwin said on Twitter that it was acceptable to call Brazilian politician Jair Bolsonaro, who had won the first round and later the second round of the presidential election, a "Nazi"

Gregory of Tours, the historian of the Merovingian Franks, had described one Frankish king as the Herod of his time, due to his brutality.

Attila the Hun, Genghis Khan, Caligula, Nero, were among the go to tyrants for pre 20th century mudslingers. Richard III was a villain in Shakespeare.

Torqumada and the Spanish Inquisition, were rather notorious. But only along sectarian lines. Protestants and Jews hated the Spanish Inquisition, but not Catholics.

Sometimes they would just compare you to a cannibal, or a head hunter.

Yes that's true, the Franks didn't push against the Frisians and Saxons till the late 780s

Hitler was brought to power by the depression caused the end of WW1 and Austria/Hungary-Germany's defeat in WW1 and the harsh conditions of the treaty of Versailles.

WW1 started because Gavrilo Princip shot Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo as a member of young Bosnia and funded and armed by the Black hand.Young Bosnia and the Black Hand were anti-Austria/Hungary organizations with hatred stemming from Austria/Hungary's annexation of Bosnia-Herzogovina by Austria/Hungary 1908.

In other words 600 years of arrogance by the Habsburg empire is the womb that conceived and birthed Hitler.That much evil doesn't begin overnight,Hitler was birthed from a 600 year crucible.