Board index › General Discussion › News and Current Events

Biggest Lie of Our Century - WHO Vindicates China

Page 1 of 3 [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

blackomen
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 8 Sep 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 264
Location: Former Californian in Dallas

11 Feb 2021, 9:15 am



I'd be surprised if the world will buy this explanation given the circumstances around the WHO investigation.


_________________
The Internet is HUGE and search engines and social media are only showing you a tiny fraction of it.


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

11 Feb 2021, 9:19 am

I am not surprised that red-state people with no medical background whatsoever will let YouTube do their thinking for them and deny the validity of reports by medical experts when those reports contradict their favorite mythological narratives (e.g., conspiracy theories).



blackomen
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 8 Sep 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 264
Location: Former Californian in Dallas

11 Feb 2021, 9:22 am

Fnord wrote:
I am not surprised that red-state people with no medical background whatsoever will let YouTube do their thinking for them and deny the validity of reports by medical experts when those reports contradict their favorite mythological narratives (e.g., conspiracy theories).


Why do you think that? Please elaborate.


_________________
The Internet is HUGE and search engines and social media are only showing you a tiny fraction of it.


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

11 Feb 2021, 9:25 am

blackomen wrote:
Fnord wrote:
I am not surprised that red-state people with no medical background whatsoever will let YouTube do their thinking for them and deny the validity of reports by medical experts when those reports contradict their favorite mythological narratives (e.g., conspiracy theories).
Why do you think that? Please elaborate.
Because letting YouTube do my thinking for me would be both lazy and an abdication of reason.



blackomen
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 8 Sep 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 264
Location: Former Californian in Dallas

11 Feb 2021, 9:29 am

Fnord wrote:
blackomen wrote:
Fnord wrote:
I am not surprised that red-state people with no medical background whatsoever will let YouTube do their thinking for them and deny the validity of reports by medical experts when those reports contradict their favorite mythological narratives (e.g., conspiracy theories).
Why do you think that? Please elaborate.
Because letting YouTube do my thinking for me would be both lazy and an abdication of reason.


True, but why is that relevant here?


_________________
The Internet is HUGE and search engines and social media are only showing you a tiny fraction of it.


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

11 Feb 2021, 9:29 am

blackomen wrote:
Fnord wrote:
blackomen wrote:
Fnord wrote:
I am not surprised that red-state people with no medical background whatsoever will let YouTube do their thinking for them and deny the validity of reports by medical experts when those reports contradict their favorite mythological narratives (e.g., conspiracy theories).
Why do you think that? Please elaborate.
Because letting YouTube do my thinking for me would be both lazy and an abdication of reason.
True, but why is that relevant here?
From where did you obtain your "proof"?



blackomen
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 8 Sep 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 264
Location: Former Californian in Dallas

11 Feb 2021, 9:31 am

Fnord wrote:
blackomen wrote:
Fnord wrote:
blackomen wrote:
Fnord wrote:
I am not surprised that red-state people with no medical background whatsoever will let YouTube do their thinking for them and deny the validity of reports by medical experts when those reports contradict their favorite mythological narratives (e.g., conspiracy theories).
Why do you think that? Please elaborate.
Because letting YouTube do my thinking for me would be both lazy and an abdication of reason.
True, but why is that relevant here?
From where did you obtain your "proof"?


And how does that answer my question?


_________________
The Internet is HUGE and search engines and social media are only showing you a tiny fraction of it.


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

11 Feb 2021, 9:32 am

blackomen wrote:
Fnord wrote:
blackomen wrote:
Fnord wrote:
blackomen wrote:
Fnord wrote:
I am not surprised that red-state people with no medical background whatsoever will let YouTube do their thinking for them and deny the validity of reports by medical experts when those reports contradict their favorite mythological narratives (e.g., conspiracy theories).
Why do you think that? Please elaborate.
Because letting YouTube do my thinking for me would be both lazy and an abdication of reason.
True, but why is that relevant here?
From where did you obtain your "proof"?
And how does that answer my question?
Think about it...



blackomen
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 8 Sep 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 264
Location: Former Californian in Dallas

11 Feb 2021, 9:32 am

Fnord wrote:
blackomen wrote:
Fnord wrote:
blackomen wrote:
Fnord wrote:
blackomen wrote:
Fnord wrote:
I am not surprised that red-state people with no medical background whatsoever will let YouTube do their thinking for them and deny the validity of reports by medical experts when those reports contradict their favorite mythological narratives (e.g., conspiracy theories).
Why do you think that? Please elaborate.
Because letting YouTube do my thinking for me would be both lazy and an abdication of reason.
True, but why is that relevant here?
From where did you obtain your "proof"?
And how does that answer my question?
Think about it...


Define "think"


_________________
The Internet is HUGE and search engines and social media are only showing you a tiny fraction of it.


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

11 Feb 2021, 9:36 am

blackomen wrote:
Fnord wrote:
blackomen wrote:
Fnord wrote:
blackomen wrote:
Fnord wrote:
blackomen wrote:
Fnord wrote:
I am not surprised that red-state people with no medical background whatsoever will let YouTube do their thinking for them and deny the validity of reports by medical experts when those reports contradict their favorite mythological narratives (e.g., conspiracy theories).
Why do you think that? Please elaborate.
Because letting YouTube do my thinking for me would be both lazy and an abdication of reason.
True, but why is that relevant here?
From where did you obtain your "proof"?
And how does that answer my question?
Think about it...
Define "think"
Define "Obtuse".



blackomen
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 8 Sep 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 264
Location: Former Californian in Dallas

11 Feb 2021, 9:38 am

Fnord wrote:
blackomen wrote:
Fnord wrote:
blackomen wrote:
Fnord wrote:
blackomen wrote:
Fnord wrote:
blackomen wrote:
Fnord wrote:
I am not surprised that red-state people with no medical background whatsoever will let YouTube do their thinking for them and deny the validity of reports by medical experts when those reports contradict their favorite mythological narratives (e.g., conspiracy theories).
Why do you think that? Please elaborate.
Because letting YouTube do my thinking for me would be both lazy and an abdication of reason.
True, but why is that relevant here?
From where did you obtain your "proof"?
And how does that answer my question?
Think about it...
Define "think"
Define "Obtuse".


Why?


_________________
The Internet is HUGE and search engines and social media are only showing you a tiny fraction of it.


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,399
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

11 Feb 2021, 9:44 am

The big question is though, why did the WHO waited for a whole year to start the investigation in Wuhan?

And if it really escaped the lab, do you think the Chinese regime would keep the traces there and let them find out? :lol: C'mon.



Mr Reynholm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2019
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,363
Location: Tulsa, OK

11 Feb 2021, 9:48 am

Not surprising that the WHO's "Investigation" would make China look good.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,399
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

11 Feb 2021, 9:53 am

Fnord wrote:
I am not surprised that red-state people with no medical background whatsoever will let YouTube do their thinking for them and deny the validity of reports by medical experts when those reports contradict their favorite mythological narratives (e.g., conspiracy theories).


What the guy did in this video is called critical thinking, don't dismiss it just because it's on youtube.

1- Why after 1 year?
2- Why only 3 hours in lab
3- Don't you find that the fact that Wuhan lab did studies on bat-coronaviruses is an odd coincidence?



Last edited by The_Face_of_Boo on 11 Feb 2021, 9:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

11 Feb 2021, 9:54 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Fnord wrote:
I am not surprised that red-state people with no medical background whatsoever will let YouTube do their thinking for them and deny the validity of reports by medical experts when those reports contradict their favorite mythological narratives (e.g., conspiracy theories).
What the guy did in this video is called critical thinking, don't dismiss it just because it's on youtube.
Have you googled his credentials?



blackomen
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 8 Sep 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 264
Location: Former Californian in Dallas

11 Feb 2021, 9:55 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
The big question is though, why did the WHO waited for a whole year to start the investigation in Wuhan?

And if it really escaped the lab, do you think the Chinese regime would keep the traces there and let them find out? :lol: C'mon.


That alone raises a lot of alarm bells. And I think the WHO wasn't allowed in early in the pandemic.

I mean, theoretically, it's entirely possible that China's completely innocent but it certainly isn't behaving in a way that would support that claim.


_________________
The Internet is HUGE and search engines and social media are only showing you a tiny fraction of it.