89% of Covid-19 deaths are among the fully vaccinated

Page 1 of 2 [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Soliloquist
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2011
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 467

18 Dec 2021, 1:11 pm

The Exposé on November 25, 2021 wrote:
89% of Covid-19 Deaths among the Fully Vaccinated – Latest Public Health Data proves this is a ‘Pandemic of the Fully Vaccinated’ and suggests the Vaccinated are more likely to die

If you get all your information from BBC News then you could be forgiven for thinking the world is currently experiencing a ‘Pandemic of the Unvaccinated’. You only have to look at what they did in Austria, by discriminatorily putting the Unvaccinated in a lockdown, to be given that impression.

But you are being manipulated and lied to, and we can prove it.

The latest official Public Health data from Scotland not only proves that this the world is in fact in the grip of a ‘Pandemic of the Fully Vaccinated’, it also proves that those who have so far chosen to avoid the questionable Covid-19 injections, are much better off for doing so.

Because the data shows that the fully vaccinated are up to five times more likely to die if infected with Covid-19.
Image
Public Health Scotland publish a weekly report containing statistics on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths by vaccination status, and their latest report was published on Wednesday 22nd November.

The report contains data on the number of Covid-19 cases and hospitalisations from October 23rd 2021 to November 19th 2021, and the number of Covid-19 deaths from 16th October 2021 to 12th November 2021.

Here’s what the latest report revealed in terms of whether this is a ‘Pandemic of the Unvaccinated or Fully Vaccinated’…

Covid-19 Cases

Table 18 of the latest ‘Covid-19 Statistical Report’ shows the number of Covid-19 cases per week by vaccination status between October 23rd and November 19th. We’ve created the following chart on the published data.
Image
This data proves that the majority of Covid-19 cases in the past four weeks have been among the fully vaccinated population.
Image
The above chart shows the cumulative number of cases per week by vaccination status as well as the projected number of cases per week up to December 17th 2021 based on the current trend.

As things stand there were 28,711 Covid-19 cases among the unvaccinated population between Oct 23rd and Nov 19th, with projections showing cases could increase to a cumulative total of approximately 60,000 by Dec 17th among the unvaccinated.

But there are far more cases among the vaccinated population, with 50,222 cases being recorded between Oct 23rd and Nov 19th, and projections show cases could rise to a cumulative total of approximately 105,000 by Dec 17th.

Covid-19 Hospitalisations

Table 19 of the latest ‘Covid-19 Statistical Report’ shows the number of Covid-19 hospitalisations per week by vaccination status between October 23rd and November 19th. We’ve created the following chart on the published data.
Image
This data proves that the majority of Covid-19 hospitalisations in the past four weeks have been among the fully vaccinated population.
Image
The above chart shows the cumulative number of hospitalisations per week by vaccination status as well as the projected number of hospitalisations per week up to December 17th 2021 based on the current trend.

Between Oct 23rd and Nov 19th there were 559 hospitalisations among the unvaccinated population, and projections show that the cumulative total of hospitalisations among the unvaccinated could rise to approximately 1,000 by Dec 17th.

But things are looking much worse for the fully vaccinated. There were 1,564 Covid-19 hospitalisations among the vaccinated population between Oct 23rd and Nov 19th. But projections show this could rise to a cumulative total of approximately 3,300 by Dec 17th.

Covid-19 Deaths

Table 20 of the latest ‘Covid-19 Statistical Report’ shows the number of Covid-19 deathsper week by vaccination status between October 16th and November 12th. We’ve created the following chart on the published data.
Image
This data proves that the majority of Covid-19 deaths in the past four weeks have been among the fully vaccinated population.
Image
The above chart shows the cumulative number of deaths per week by vaccination status as well as the projected number of deaths per week up to December 10th 2021 based on the current trend.

As things stand there were just 54 Covid-19 deaths among the unvaccinated population between Oct 16th and Nov 12th, with projections showing deaths could increase to a cumulative total of approximately 95 by Dec 10th among the unvaccinated.

But if you are fully vaccinated then your chances of dying if infected with Covid-19 look far worse. Because there were 447 deaths among the vaccinated population between Oct 16th and Nov 12th, and projections show deaths could rise to a cumulative total of approximately 930 by Dec 10th.

Covid-19 Case / Hospitalisation / Fatality Rates

The following chart shows the percentage of Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths by vaccination status according to the latest Public Health Scotland ‘Covid-19 Statistical Report’.
Image
The chart shows that the vaccinated population accounted for 64% of cases and 74% of hospitalisations between Oct 23rd and Nov 19th, whilst the unvaccinated population accounted for 36% of cases and 26% of hospitalisations.

Meanwhile between Oct 16th and Nov 12th, the vaccinated population accounted for a frightening 89% of Covid-19 deaths, whilst the unvaccinated population accounted for just 11%.

The above chart also clearly demonstrates something rather strange considering we know that the Covid-19 injections cannot prevent infection or transmission of the Covid-19 virus (ask yourself what the point of vaccine passports are, because they’re certainly not about “stopping the spread”), but are alleged to reduce the risk of hospitalisation and death by up to 95%.

But if this was the case then we should be seeing that the percentage of hospitalisations and deaths attributed to the vaccinated population is much less than the percentage of cases attributed to the vaccinated population. But we’re not, which calls for further investigation, and this is what we found –
Image
The above chart shows the case-hospitalisation rate (No. Cases / No. Hosp.), case-fatality rate (No. Cases / No. Deaths), and hospitalisation fatality rate (No. Hosp / No. Deaths) by vaccination status.

These are the figures we should be looking at to determine the effectiveness of the vaccines because it is impossible to be hospitalised with Covid-19 or die with Covid-19 if you have not first been infected with Covid-19.

Therefore, the rates per 100,000 of the general population used by the likes of BBC News are used to deceive you.

Demonstrating the effectiveness of the vaccines by using the number of Covid-19 deaths by vaccination status per 100,000 of the general population, is like demonstrating the effectiveness of a professional egg cracker by using the number of broken yolks per 100,000 eggs in the world.

The professional egg cracker cannot break a yolk unless they first crack an egg, the same as a person cannot die with Covid-19 unless first infected with Covid-19. Therefore, the effectiveness of the egg cracker should be calculated against the number of eggs cracked, and the effectiveness of a vaccine against death due to Covid-19 should be calculated against the number of confirmed cases of Covid-19.

Now that we’ve cleared that up – It’s quite concerning to find that all three rates are much higher among the vaccinated population, we should surely be seeing the opposite if the Covid-19 vaccines reduce the risk of hospitalisation and death?

But unfortunately the above figures do not just suggest that the vaccines are ineffective, they actually suggest that they make the recipient worse.

A vaccine effectiveness of +95% against death from Covid-19 would mean that the unvaccinated population have a 95% higher chance of dying if infected with Covid-19 than the vaccinated.

A vaccine effectiveness of 0% would mean that the vaccines are ineffective and the vaccinated and unvaccinated have the same chance of dying if infected with Covid-19.

But a vaccine effectiveness of -95% would mean that the vaccines actually make the recipient worse, by for example decimating the recipients immune system, or invoking a response such as antibody-dependent-enhancement. Which makes the following figures extremely concerning.
Image
The above chart shows the increased risk of hospitalisation if infected with Covid-19, the increased risk of death if infected with Covid-19, and the increased risk of death if hospitalised with Covid-19, among the vaccinated population. The percentages have been calculated based on the ‘Rates by Vaccination Status’ calculated in the previous chart.

The chart shows that the vaccinated are 63% more likely to be hospitalised with Covid-19 if infected, therefore this shows that the Covid-19 vaccines have an average vaccine effectiveness of -63% against hospitalisation.

But the most concerning figure demonstrated on the above chart shows that the vaccinated are 394% more likely to die with Covid-19 if infected. This shows that the Covid-19 vaccines have an average vaccine effectiveness of -394% against death suggesting the injections are completely decimating the recipients immune systems.

Pandemic of the Fully Vaccinated

So there you have it. The latest data published by Public Health Scotland confirms that with 64% of cases, 74% of hospitalisations, and 89% of deaths over the past four weeks having been among the vaccinated population, that this is not a ‘Pandemic of the Unvaccinated’, and is instead very much a ‘Pandemic of the Fully Vaccinated’.

But not only that, the data also proves that the Covid-19 injections not only do not work, they also make the recipient worse, with a case-fatality rate five times higher among the vaccinated population than the unvaccinated population.

For the good of humanity it’s time to switch off BBC News and realise they’ve been manipulating you and lying to you, because the past year and half has had absolutely nothing to do with a virus, and everything to do with control.


Source



NoClearMind53
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

Joined: 25 Mar 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 369

18 Dec 2021, 3:57 pm

The vaccine is not as effective against the delta or omicron variants as it was designed based on the earlier strands. This is true especially for people vaccinated over 6 months ago and lacking a booster. I notice that the percentage of people vaccinated in the given data sets was conveniently left out to support your false claim that being vaccinated INCREASES the risk of death or hospitalization. Please, somebody who understands statistics and math explain it. I don't have the goddamn time since there are 10 million of you to respond to and I'm too exhausted. I'm not here to promote vaccine mandates, but at least do the math right if you're going to make claims to scare people.



SabbraCadabra
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,694
Location: Michigan

18 Dec 2021, 8:45 pm

That was a very long article written by someone who is either unable to do simple math, or is purposefully being deceitful.

Let's use a Real World example:

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-58548727

For the sake of this example, we'll use the numbers in this article. It says almost 85% of Scotland (3,837,621 individuals) is fully vaccinated, leaving 709,323 who are not.

For this example, let's keep it simple and say that 10% of the country suddenly contracts the virus and tests positive for it.

To get ten percent, you take the total number, and multiply it by 0.10. You don't even need a calculator for this, just take the decimal place and move it left one space.

Thus:

3,837,621 x 0.1 = 383,762.1
709,323 x 0.1 = 70,932.3

383,762.1 fully vaccinated individuals now have tested positive for Covid (Group A), versus 70,932.3 who were not (Group B). That's 82%, which isn't too far off from the 89% cited in the original article.

You can see how these results are misleading. Group A is a LOT bigger than Group B.
But we're not even taking into account the fact that whatever theoretical number our variable (10 percent) actually is, should be smaller for Group A (having more protection against the virus), and bigger for Group B; we've got a lot of wiggle room there.

We could drop it by half for 5% Group A, and leave Group B at 10%, and Group A is still going to have larger numbers:

3,837,621 x 0.05 = 191,881.05
709,323 x 0.1 = 70,932.3

We're getting further from our target of 89%, there are a lot of other variables we haven't considered (and most of them cannot be measured), but I'm sure you get the idea by now.


NoClearMind53 wrote:
Please, somebody who understands statistics and math explain it.

No problem =)


_________________
I'm looking for Someone to change my life. I'm looking for a Miracle in my life.


DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,687
Location: Northern California

18 Dec 2021, 11:44 pm

The local data in my county, which is published regularly without comment, says the opposite of what this author has concluded. The vaccines are saving lives and reducing hospitalizations. Deaths among the vaccinated are highly infrequent.

In addition, a lot of variables come into play that extend beyond whether someone is vaccinated or not. First and foremost may be that the vaccinated have been given permission to move freely and with less masking. Those activities increase exposure to Omicron. Increased exposure = increased infections. The important message people need to hear IMO is NOT to drop caution just because you’ve been vaccinated. Get vaccinated, but also mask/distance. Events that admit everyone maskless as long as everyone is vaccinated need to end.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).


magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

19 Dec 2021, 5:53 am

OP quotes data with the same fallacy again.
In a population with 100% vaccination rate, 100% of those who die would have been vaccinated and 0% unvaccinated would die.
In UK, nearly every vulnerable person has been vaccinated. Of course some of them die and there are not enough unvaccinated vulnerable people in the population to make up for the other side of the chart.

In Poland, with about 60% overall vaccination rate and some 80% among the vulnerable populations, almost all the ICU cases and deaths are of the non-vaxed. The rest are mostly immunocompromised people with whom the shots don't work as designed.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,147
Location: temperate zone

19 Dec 2021, 6:16 am

What Mag said.

The author of the article is obviously either honesty-impaired, or intellectually impaired, or both. So we probably cant trust his figures to begin with. But assuming we can trust his figures: he is saying that eighty some percent of deaths in Scotland are of the vaccinated. And says that that proves that being vaxxed is worse than not being vaxxed. But he doesnt mentione the fact that eighty some percent of the whole population is vaxxed. So it would cancel out. And though it does imply that the death rate is about the same (ergo vaccines wouldnt seem to be effective), it doesnt really show that being vaxxed is worse than not being. And it doesnt take other variables into account. Like perhaps they vaccinated the eldery in nursing homes first, and other vulnerable groups, and maybe the vulnerable groups are still more vulnerable even after being vaxxed.



Mountain Goat
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 13 May 2019
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,202
Location: .

19 Dec 2021, 8:26 am

This is worrying because it is along similar lines where potentially this new drug could kill more patients then it saves (They don't know) and it has been approved by the FDA with ONLY a 30% success rate?

If I put a part on my car or bicycle that only had a 30% chance that it would function correctly and had no guarantees that it would be safe to use, I would be nuts as what if it was a brake part or a component of the steering? And yet, this is FAR MORE SERIOUS as this is ones OWN BODY and LIFE we are talking about here.



https://youtu.be/bvevJePdNEk

America is going nuts to allow this. Why doesn't your president step up and change your system? Why have any regulations at all if this is allowed to happen as the regulations act as ways to prevent foreign competition rather than to actually regulate if the drug is safe for public use.

This is stupid. Has covid effected your governments brais! Does Biden have anything inside his puppet like mind other than attempt to try and stop the freedom of speech by a few so the general public gets robbed of their taxes and they never get to know about it?

Theft is one thing as it only effects ones wealth, but this has the potential to effect lives! It is just plain stupid that the FDA is allowed to regulate at all? They have become like "Witch" here is in the UK when they endorse products from companies that pay them the most so they can claim they have a "Which recommended buy" endorsement on their product and the gullable public buy the products based on this because they clearly don't know what is going on.

Your government under Biden is capitalism gove wrong, and YOUR health and wellbeing both financial and otherwize is at risk here.

How come you accept this? How come Biden is your hero when he turns a blind eye to your health and wellbeing? Is he the major shareholder of these companes that make the drugs? What is going on here?

America... The land of the free? What was that all about? More like America. The land of the gullable and exploited!


_________________
.


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

19 Dec 2021, 10:08 am

I wish the vaccines were more effective. I wish they weren’t more like flu shots than the polio vaccine.

That’s the reality going forward: shots based upon the “variant of the month” or year—just like the flu shots.

I would listen to YouTube presentations by doctors who are actually “on the front lines,” working in hospitals with COVID patients….

Rather than read and believe someone who only relies on statistics, and sits in an ivory tower away from what’s really going on.



Nades
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 8 Jan 2017
Age: 1933
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,814
Location: wales

19 Dec 2021, 10:26 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
I wish the vaccines were more effective. I wish they weren’t more like flu shots than the polio vaccine.

That’s the reality going forward: shots based upon the “variant of the month” or year—just like the flu shots.

I would listen to YouTube presentations by doctors who are actually “on the front lines,” working in hospitals with COVID patients….

Rather than read and believe someone who only relies on statistics, and sits in an ivory tower away from what’s really going on.


This is the problem. They're not potent enough to stop any spread and they don't last anywhere near long enough.

All covid jabs are inefective really.



Nades
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 8 Jan 2017
Age: 1933
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,814
Location: wales

19 Dec 2021, 10:40 am

naturalplastic wrote:
What Mag said.

The author of the article is obviously either honesty-impaired, or intellectually impaired, or both. So we probably cant trust his figures to begin with. But assuming we can trust his figures: he is saying that eighty some percent of deaths in Scotland are of the vaccinated. And says that that proves that being vaxxed is worse than not being vaxxed. But he doesnt mentione the fact that eighty some percent of the whole population is vaxxed. So it would cancel out. And though it does imply that the death rate is about the same (ergo vaccines wouldnt seem to be effective), it doesnt really show that being vaxxed is worse than not being. And it doesnt take other variables into account. Like perhaps they vaccinated the eldery in nursing homes first, and other vulnerable groups, and maybe the vulnerable groups are still more vulnerable even after being vaxxed.


Assuming the stats are correct it actually implies the vaccines are not very good.

A 50/50 mix of those dying between vacced and unvacced implies the vaccine is working to a limited extent.

If the numbers dying are proportional to the percentage of vaccinated people then it implies the vaccine is doing very little.

Assuming the stats are correct the vaccine is doing nothing, hence the sudden panic in higher government in literally all the develope world.



Mountain Goat
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 13 May 2019
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,202
Location: .

19 Dec 2021, 11:08 am

The problem here is vaccinating against a virus is not practical due to its mutation qualities. Fortunately as it mutates it weakens.


_________________
.


ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,478
Location: Long Island, New York

19 Dec 2021, 11:31 am

Nades wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
What Mag said.

The author of the article is obviously either honesty-impaired, or intellectually impaired, or both. So we probably cant trust his figures to begin with. But assuming we can trust his figures: he is saying that eighty some percent of deaths in Scotland are of the vaccinated. And says that that proves that being vaxxed is worse than not being vaxxed. But he doesnt mentione the fact that eighty some percent of the whole population is vaxxed. So it would cancel out. And though it does imply that the death rate is about the same (ergo vaccines wouldnt seem to be effective), it doesnt really show that being vaxxed is worse than not being. And it doesnt take other variables into account. Like perhaps they vaccinated the eldery in nursing homes first, and other vulnerable groups, and maybe the vulnerable groups are still more vulnerable even after being vaxxed.


Assuming the stats are correct it actually implies the vaccines are not very good.

A 50/50 mix of those dying between vacced and unvacced implies the vaccine is working to a limited extent.

If the numbers dying are proportional to the percentage of vaccinated people then it implies the vaccine is doing very little.

Assuming the stats are correct the vaccine is doing nothing, hence the sudden panic in higher government in literally all the develope world.

The problem for many is not that they do no good, it is that these ones are far from perfect and that it was promised they would be. They are keeping people from becoming severely ill at a far greater rate the they harm, that is good. This keeps hospital beds available for people with other illness available, that is good. For arguments sake lets assume some fast spreading virulent variant renders the vaccines useless, half the people die, all modern conveniences unsustainable etc. In that case the vaccines gave people time to enjoy life, that would be good.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

It is Autism Acceptance Month

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 59,890
Location: Stendec

19 Dec 2021, 11:45 am

The Daily Expose is a Tin-Foil Hat Conspiracy and Quackery level Pseudoscience website based on promoting false and misleading information regarding Covid-19. The OP has posted falsehoods, lies, and delusional fantasies.

Source:
This Media Bias/Fact Check Article



MrsPeel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Oct 2017
Age: 52
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,746
Location: Australia

19 Dec 2021, 8:18 pm

It upsets me that so many people get taken in by this kind of BS.
The piece posted in the OP is obviously and deliberately misleading (presumably to further an agenda).

When there are, what, maybe eight nine times as many people vaccinated as unvaccinated (?), it's hardly surprising that the vaccinated make up the majority of cases. That says very little about the effectiveness of the various vaccines and nothing at all about whether or not it is in your best interest to be vaccinated.

It certainly does not mean that you are more likely to get covid if you are vaccinated. (In fact, the opposite is true).
Yet I sense that is what they are trying to imply.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

20 Dec 2021, 5:15 am

The agenda is…..they don’t like vaccines, or believe vaccines is part of some government conspiracy, or believe vaccines are part of a “leftist” plot, or just don’t want to get pricked with a needle.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,470
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

20 Dec 2021, 5:27 am

Nades wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
I wish the vaccines were more effective. I wish they weren’t more like flu shots than the polio vaccine.

That’s the reality going forward: shots based upon the “variant of the month” or year—just like the flu shots.

I would listen to YouTube presentations by doctors who are actually “on the front lines,” working in hospitals with COVID patients….

Rather than read and believe someone who only relies on statistics, and sits in an ivory tower away from what’s really going on.


This is the problem. They're not potent enough to stop any spread and they don't last anywhere near long enough.

All covid jabs are inefective really.


But isn't it still best to get them unless you have health reasons that could cause risks? I mean so it doesn't last long enough so already me and my boyfriend are planning to get the booster shots...If it at least lowers the risk of dying from covid that is at least something. Like lack of potency does not seem a good reason to avoid the vaccine, as it is at least better than no extra defense against covid.


_________________
We won't go back.