r00tb33r wrote:
Makes sense. I think I've voted since 2007, as far back as then I remember I've always been asked to present one, checked against my voter registration.
Yes, however, most people in Britain don't know about the new law that means they must have photo ID. They will go to the polling station and be turned away because they don't have any.
But the older people with photo ID (who are more likely to vote Conservative) will be able to vote due to such a wide range of their photo IDs being accepted. The younger people (who are more likely to vote Labour/Liberal Democrat) will be less able to vote due to such a small range of their photo IDs being accepted.
Can you see what's happening? The Conservative government is not publicising this change in the law, so people won't know about it. They will arrive at the polling station with no photo ID and won't be able to vote. If they are older, they are more likely to have an acceptable photo ID than if they are younger. Also, older people are more likely to have the money to buy photo ID, younger people are not.
A caring government would do its utmost to publicise the need for photo ID long before an election. But the British government is not doing that...
Recently there was an election in a constituency of 6000 people. Only 1000 people voted! That's 19% of the electorate. That is very worrying. Only 19% of people cared about their future.
_________________
That alien woman. On Earth to observe and wonder about homo sapiens.