UFO engineering 101

Post Reply New Topic

With the disclosure of US housing downed exotic UAP craft, it might be time to examine the engineering behind these craft

Firstly drone type orbs - these are the most common objects seen. The current 4th Season of Skinwalker ranch has finally determined multiple sightings of the same orb in both daylight and night time


The shape is clearly as follows like an old steel yoyos


the indent in the middle has something to do with propulsion which means taking off or landing they need to flip sideways.

Saucer shaped UFOs. In Australia in the late 1960s it was determined that saucers when they get close to land flipped sideways to hover like this


This is how the UFOs seen in Victoria, Australia in the 1960s were observed to do as they get close to the ground, they move a flat position to sideways like in the movie Arrival



More to come

 
 Check Out This Link 

I feel we should have a theories thread...

I feel we should have another "Critical Thinking" thread, and a requirement that members read it.

No there's lots of objects seen that are discs doing manoeuvres where the disc flies sideways It seems to be something to do with the propulsion.

Now for a lecture on the advanced alien physics of UFOs, being given by the professor: Dr. Tommy Smothers.
At 505 there is even a move called "the flying saucer".


yo

Only Tommy Smothers can save us...from the alien overlords!

I can't find it know but there's a 2023 video from Chile taken by a family having a picnic on a mountain, They film a stationary disc which then filmed starting to take off and you can see the undercarriage. Interestingly the initial thrust or propulsion required the disc to be sideways first.

It's eerily like the fictional Slave 1 owned by Boba Fett in Star Wars.

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink...unfortunately.

Are you and Fnord the fun police?

Anyway don't take my word for it...

Professor Avi Loeb, Head of Astronomy, Harvard University
"In case of UFOs extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. But It would be arrogant of us to relax on the sofa at home and ask: ‘where is everybody?’ without looking through our windows for any neighbors,”
https://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-s ... -to-earth/

Professor Edwin Turner - Professor of Astrophysics, Princeton
“In science, we’re taught to be conservative and skeptical in many ways. That’s crucial when you’re designing experiments and interpreting data. But that mind-set can hold scientists back when it makes them reject any new hypothesis that doesn’t seem consistent with everything we knew before. You want to be critical in your methodology but unfettered in your imagination.”

Sara Seager an MIT astrophysicist and MacArthur Fellow who innovated a groundbreaking method for studying the atmospheres of far-off planets. "When it comes to alien life most scientists are incredibly narrow,”
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science- ... 180978579/

^ Okay...

None of those quotes make the claims you're making in this thread or elsewhere valid. The "evidence" you provide is kind of cringey. The History Channel, YouTube, and random pictures are typically not great sources.

We may have different opinions about what constitutes "fun." "Fun" is subjective.

Last edited by TwilightPrincess on 09 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Science is fun....

In any case I am not easily one to settle into static dogma.

We must keep progressing to build the body of knowledge about the universe

I agree. That's why critical thinking and verifiable evidence and research are so important. Without such things, people tend to believe conspiracies and lots of other nonsense which can set us back and inhibit progress.

I like science (real science), too. It IS fun.

Isn't it true that scientists know more about outer space than about the oceans?

^ I wouldn't think so. It may be the Moon and Mars.

Last edited by TwilightPrincess on 09 Jun 2023, 9:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Oh OK. That's something I remember hearing over the years.

I have no way of knowing how true it is.

if you read the quotes from the three top US academics in the field of astronomy and astrophysics they preface their statements with fundamental axioms from the scientific method.

Again this is no longer a conspiracy theory if the US Pentagon, CIA, NASA and now even congress are taking it seriously.
The US government and private money are currently financing Avi Loeb's Gallileo project
https://www.scientificamerican.com/arti ... isitation/

Since when does the US government fund conspiracy theories in the name of science?