Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ]
AnonymousAnonymous
Veteran
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 73,786
Location: Portland, Oregon
08 Dec 2023, 4:44 pm
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
09 Dec 2023, 4:20 pm
Largely a win for justice, but It's the last bit that's a bit concerning:
Quote:
“As a high-ranking government official who exercises ultimate control over the conduct of this prosecution, the Special Counsel is no more entitled to protection from lawful public criticism than is the institution he represents,” the court wrote.
Criticism is one thing, but slander/libel is another. If trump says all sorts of outlandish things about Jack Smith that simply aren't true in attempts to get his cult members to do another stochastic terrorism against Jack Smith and/or his staff or family, he should face harsh consequences for it. Big difference between criticism and speech that he's intending to cause unhinged lunatics to attack someone over.
I bet we see further court hearings to decipher and differentiate between those types of stupid speech trump is surely to continue with. He's too big of a man-child to behave himself appropriately.
_________________
No
for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.
Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ]
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Judge says Trump administration violated court order |
21 May 2025, 9:47 pm |
| Court says Trump doesn't have the authority to set tariffs |
29 May 2025, 11:22 pm |
| Trump set to sign executive order closing Ed Department |
21 Mar 2025, 1:09 pm |
| SCOTUS halts judge’s order to reinstate workers |
08 Apr 2025, 9:02 pm |
