sinsboldly
Veteran
Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon
27 Aug 2007, 7:59 am
AnonymousAnonymous
Veteran
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 76,280
Location: Portland, Oregon
27 Aug 2007, 1:12 pm
27 Aug 2007, 1:23 pm
27 Aug 2007, 1:54 pm
27 Aug 2007, 2:20 pm
JonnyBGoode wrote:
But sadly there are too many people with such a pathological hatred for Bush that they take great glee in destroying the lives of anyone associated with him.
UncleBeer
Veteran
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 683
Location: temporarily trapped in Holland
27 Aug 2007, 3:02 pm
gitchel wrote:
Is it really fair to characterize every person who hates Bush and enjoys the downfall of his crappy posse as being "pathological?"
Seems like a rather sweeping generalization to me.
Seems like a rather sweeping generalization to me.
No less so than the agenda-driven "journalism" that fueled Gonzalez' departure.
UncleBeer
Veteran
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 683
Location: temporarily trapped in Holland
27 Aug 2007, 3:03 pm
manalitwist wrote:
JonnyBGoode wrote:
But sadly there are too many people with such a pathological hatred for Bush that they take great glee in destroying the lives of anyone associated with him.
Another finely-honed intellect bent only on ... conspiracy theory.
27 Aug 2007, 3:08 pm
UncleBeer wrote:
Another finely-honed intellect bent only on ... conspiracy theory.
Its only a conspiracy theory because someone was sent the society log books. Otherwise it wouldnt be anything at all as you would not know anything at all.
UncleBeer
Veteran
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 683
Location: temporarily trapped in Holland
27 Aug 2007, 3:25 pm
manalitwist wrote:
UncleBeer wrote:
Another finely-honed intellect bent only on ... conspiracy theory.
Its only a conspiracy theory because someone was sent the society log books. Otherwise it wouldnt be anything at all as you would not know anything at all.
According to you and your conspiracy theory.
27 Aug 2007, 3:28 pm
UncleBeer wrote:
manalitwist wrote:
UncleBeer wrote:
Another finely-honed intellect bent only on ... conspiracy theory.
Its only a conspiracy theory because someone was sent the society log books. Otherwise it wouldnt be anything at all as you would not know anything at all.
According to you and your conspiracy theory.
Do you know what you are talking about? According to fact, look at the photo there is Bush. Read Prophesor Manly P hall's book on the subject or at least wikipedia.
UncleBeer
Veteran
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 683
Location: temporarily trapped in Holland
27 Aug 2007, 3:44 pm
manalitwist wrote:
UncleBeer wrote:
manalitwist wrote:
UncleBeer wrote:
Another finely-honed intellect bent only on ... conspiracy theory.
Its only a conspiracy theory because someone was sent the society log books. Otherwise it wouldnt be anything at all as you would not know anything at all.
According to you and your conspiracy theory.
Do you know what you are talking about? According to fact, look at the photo there is Bush. Read Prophesor Manly P hall's book on the subject or at least wikipedia.
You point to a photo that portrays no conspiracy, to a Canadian mystic who died 17 years ago, and (fer Chris' sake...) Wikipedia. Which of these is less credible? It's a tough choice.
27 Aug 2007, 3:50 pm
UncleBeer wrote:
manalitwist wrote:
UncleBeer wrote:
manalitwist wrote:
UncleBeer wrote:
Another finely-honed intellect bent only on ... conspiracy theory.
Its only a conspiracy theory because someone was sent the society log books. Otherwise it wouldnt be anything at all as you would not know anything at all.
According to you and your conspiracy theory.
Do you know what you are talking about? According to fact, look at the photo there is Bush. Read Prophesor Manly P hall's book on the subject or at least wikipedia.
You point to a photo that portrays no conspiracy, to a Canadian mystic who died 17 years ago, and (fer Chris' sake...) Wikipedia. Which of these is less credible? It's a tough choice.
I beg you pardon i meant this man - Sutton, Antony C. America's Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones.
27 Aug 2007, 3:54 pm
27 Aug 2007, 3:58 pm
27 Aug 2007, 4:20 pm
UncleBeer
Veteran
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 683
Location: temporarily trapped in Holland
27 Aug 2007, 4:27 pm
manalitwist wrote:
JonnyBGoode wrote:
John Kerry was also in Skull and Bones. But if he had won the presidency, do you really think anyone would be hating on him 24/7 and getting schadenfreude out of every single one of his appointees that got into some kind of trouble? I doubt it. Not like this.
Yes he was Skull and Bones and he did a good job of throwing the election to his senior and better Bush.
This, because of the extensive conspiracy you imagine?
