Whats your take on Hillary??

Post Reply New Topic

Just asking everyone:
whats your take on hillary?
Do you belive in her "autism" campaign?

What is it / does she want to "cure2 " it?

Hillary Clinton?

Hmmm... I was not awair she had an autism campagn, all I knew was she wanted to ban violent video games a while back, her healthcare proposal sounds decent and its likly she will become our new president. I liked her husband, all personal issues aside, he did fine professionally, for the most part, probably coulda tryed to kill bin ladden a little more... but hes a slippery guy, perhapse i can understand. I wonder if she can perform the job well, im sure she will be better then our current president.

She's with the organization Autism Speaks, that should be enough to judge her.. It's a "pretend to be aware of something to give the impression of being able to spend tax money wisely" thing for her.

She's overrated.

Hillary is anti-climactic.

Nope, I don't like her one bit. I'm about as leftist, feminist and whateverist as it gets. And she rubs me the wrong way. Her comments about autism are just icing on the cake.

No, I don't. And you'll find that most US presidential candidates are self serving and don't give a damn.

I don't like her. I've just been hearing too many negative things about her. Of course, my perspective is a bit biased, since I listen to a lot of conservative talk radio, but she really bugs me. What I've gotten out of what I've heard, is that she is an extremely mean-spirited person; so I suspect that there are a lot of liberals who don't like her, either.

I liked her husband a whole lot better than I like her. She just rubs me the wrong way, somehow.

I like her husband more, but before I knew about her autism campaign, I just thought of her as a carpetbagger who moved to New York so she could run for the Senate seat. She didn't move there for any other reason than pure ambition.

I am not a big fan of her and I believe that she will not have as easy a time winning the presidency as some people believe. She is very polarizing and seems to be one of those love them or leave them type of people, unlike Bill. Now Bill was a likable fellow that was able to draw more of the middle to him than I believe she will.

Personally, I do not plan on voting for Clinton, but I am not certain at this time who I will vote for. Nobody has been able to grab my attention, although I do like how Guilliani does in debates.

A strong "no!"

It's difficult. She does nothing for me, and despite the right's ranting, she's fairly middle of the road. There are radical Dems in the field, and Hillary's far from them. Still, she rubs so many people up the wrong way, I think she'll struggle to win the primaries. Iowa is a very conservative state, they're unlikely to vote for her, and whoever wins Iowa gets a huge boost (look at Kerry last time - a terrible choice, but it shows how little national polls matter, Iowa made a choice not in the national interest, and everyone just followed like sheep after that). If she does win, I expect her Presidency to be a difficult one - enough people dislike her and would come out to vote against her that while I think she'd win against almost any Republican candidate, the Dems would also lose a lot of congressional seats.
Personally, I'd like to see Edwards win, but that's looking less and less likely. Still, Iowa's likely to be a surprise. My wife expects Richardson to win Iowa, and he's nowhere on the map right now.

I really don't expect Richardson to do much in the election. Maybe get his name out and hope for a VP nod.


Of course, I really thought that Fred Thompson was a dead horse and the latest polls show him with an 8 pt lead over Rominey grits.