mmaestro wrote:
No publication in a peer reviewed journal = no credibility.
The study was published in Behavioral Brain Research, which has some degree of peer review, but that's no guarantee it means anything. There are a number of ways you can get rats to act autistic, but that doesn't prove that any of those things cause autism in humans. With some, it's clear that they are NOT responsible for a significant number of cases of autism in humans.
Several studies have been done on such diets, using actual humans, no less. Here is one such example.
* * * * * * * * * *
J Autism Dev Disord. 2006 Apr;36(3):413-20.
The gluten-free, casein-free diet in autism: results of a preliminary double blind clinical trial.
Elder JH, Shankar M, Shuster J, Theriaque D, Burns S, Sherrill L.
College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32610, USA.
elderjh@nursing.ufl.edu
This study tested the efficacy of a gluten-free and casein-free (GFCF) diet in treating autism using a randomized, double blind repeated measures crossover design. The sample included 15 children aged 2-16 years with autism spectrum disorder. Data on autistic symptoms and urinary peptide levels were collected in the subjects' homes over the 12 weeks that they were on the diet. Group data indicated no statistically significant findings even though several parents reported improvement in their children. Although preliminary, this study demonstrates how a controlled clinical trial of the GFCF diet can be conducted, and suggests directions for future research.
PMID: 16555138
* * * * * * * * * * *
Another study had only 4 autistics to work with, and found that the diet seemed to help one a lot, but that results with the other 3 were inconclusive. I wouldn't discourage anyone from trying it out, but I don't think anyone should have unrealistic expectations, either.