Quarter of U.S. teen girls have sex-related disease

Page 1 of 2 [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

ShadesOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,983
Location: California

11 Mar 2008, 5:11 pm

http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNe ... 5320080311

Erg. Thats so...GROSS. Thankfully I am not one of these...Precocious Teenage girls.



Kalister1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Sep 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,443

11 Mar 2008, 5:12 pm

*condom*

Check!



sgrannel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,919

11 Mar 2008, 5:15 pm

This story is also featured in the Daily Rotten News. Any rotteneers here?



pbcoll
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,892
Location: the City of Palaces

11 Mar 2008, 5:36 pm

They made their bed, now they should lie on it.


_________________
I am the steppenwolf that never learned to dance. (Sedaka)

El hombre es una bestia famélica, envidiosa e insaciable. (Francisco Tario)

I'm male by the way (yes, I know my avatar is misleading).


Peko
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,381
Location: Eastern PA, USA

11 Mar 2008, 5:46 pm

:eew: :!: :idea: Maybe girls should keep their pants on. (I am BLUNT) Or at least use condoms/STD prevention. (If you're going too have sex look up prevention stuff. DUH!) I am not a precocious individual so I cannot really sympathize with these girls. Anyone else agree :?: STD's are :ncool:

I am a :geek:

Random: I used to have an :albino: rabbit.
Never met an :albino: human.
Has anyone here met an :albino: human :?:
If so 8)



sjmrs85
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 4 Mar 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 3

11 Mar 2008, 7:13 pm

I read the article while in the library and I just had to chuckle...thinking about all of the girls who are "supposed" to have an STD now. :lol:


_________________
~S~


Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

11 Mar 2008, 7:22 pm

Well, it nicely sorts out the wheat from the chaff, doesn't it. If you can't be bothered to at least take proper precautions with the thing you're going to stick your private parts into then I have no sympathy for you.



jdbob
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2006
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 263
Location: Oregon

11 Mar 2008, 7:30 pm

I can't help but think that this has something to do with abstinance only sex "education" promoted by our idiot in chief. Real eduction would cover how to avoid infection.



EvilKimEvil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Sep 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,671

11 Mar 2008, 9:51 pm

jdbob wrote:
I can't help but think that this has something to do with abstinance only sex "education" promoted by our idiot in chief. Real eduction would cover how to avoid infection.


I agree. Abstinence only sex ed programs have been shown to be completely ineffective.



RainSong
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 May 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,306
Location: Ohio

11 Mar 2008, 11:06 pm

jdbob wrote:
I can't help but think that this has something to do with abstinance only sex "education" promoted by our idiot in chief. Real eduction would cover how to avoid infection.


Honestly, I'm not too sure about that. My high school (and middle school) teaches abstinence only, but in the six years I've had sex ed, there hasn't been a problem with STDs or pregnancies. Figure 400 girls in the high school each year, and only one has had a baby (which was before she moved here), and two have most likely had abortions. (I'm using pregnancies instead of STDs as a gauge, because it's much harder to track the STD occurrence rate (most don't publicly announce it), but pregnancy producing sex is capable of also spreading STDs.)

On the other hand, a school in the same (not too large) county has a 66% pregnancy rate in their girls (probably about 700 girls in their high school), and they don't teach abstinence only. They teach about birth control and safe sex and whatnot.

Now, maybe part of the blame rests of the school, but a good bit of it is also the girls' faults. Many teenagers think they're invincible, and they can be taught all about STDs, but they'll believe that it won't happen to them, so they're not careful. Girls also talk amongst themselves about sex, and it's unlikely that at least one girl in their circle won't be informed about safety and the dangers that come from sex. Parents are supposed to talk to their kids about safe sex as well; ultimately, it's more of their duty to inform their children about that than the schools. And perhaps the kids mean to be safe when they have sex, but they get caught in the moment and forget. Whatever it is, they still ultimately chose to participate in those actions, and some fault must lie with them. I don't think many of these girls are near as innocent as people would like to believe.


_________________
"Nothing worth having is easy."

Three years!


GoatOnFire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,986
Location: Den of the ecdysiasts

11 Mar 2008, 11:26 pm

What about the rate for guys?

How do we know that they're not just contracting herpes from toilet seats? Is pregnancy counted as an STD? I'm just curious to see how the stats are made up. It said that the actual number is higher because they didn't count gonorrhea, syphilis, and
HIV.

The only ones I feel sorry for are non slu*ty rape victims and maybe the ones that got it from toilet seats. I hated how that article made it sound like infertility is a bad thing.


_________________
I will befriend the friendless, help the helpless, and defeat... the feetless?


zendell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Nov 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,174
Location: Austin, TX

12 Mar 2008, 7:35 am

I got a few comments.

1. They mention that 48% of black teenage girls have STDs compared to 20% of white teenage girls. That seems racist.

2. The most common STD was human papilloma virus (HPV). I didn't know it was an STD. I never heard of it until I read that Texas is forcing girls to get it and then on a vaccine commercial urging people to get it. The new HPV vaccine is supposed to reduce the chance of getting cervical cancer from HPV although I read that the drug company who makes it decided not to test their vaccine for carcinogenicity which means the vaccine that is supposed to protect against cancer may actually cause cancer itself. The manufacturer is also not responsible for any harm it causes thanks to a special law the vaccine manufacturers got their politicians in DC to pass. That means you aren't allowed to sue if the vaccines puts you in the hospital, causes a chronic disabling disease, or kills you. I'm definitely staying away from it. The article sound more like a drug company advertisement for their new HPV vaccine.

3. Why are STDs so common? Were they a problem 50 or 100 years ago? If not, someone needs to do some research to determine why they suddenly became a problem. Did people use condoms more often 50 years ago compared to now? They seem to be a new disease, like AIDS, or a rapidly increasing problem, like infertility which all interestingly help the population control agenda although apparently not very effectively.

4. abstinance = 100% protection. If you don't have sex, you can't get an STD. They need to teach this in school. Many people seem to think you can't get STDs or HIV if you use a condom. "Safe sex" education (as opposed to abstinance) taught in schools seems to encourage teenagers to have sex which results in STDs. I'm guessing that the majority of the 1 in 4 teen girls with STDs used condoms thinking it would protect them against STDs. They are also at risk for HIV although I think it's quite rare for it to be transmitted sexually.



KimJ
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jun 2006
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,418
Location: Arizona

12 Mar 2008, 9:20 am

A lot of judgment around here, geez. These are kids that may have serious issues that cause them to be careless, self-destructive or unable to say no. This is an Aspie forum and there are threads here about issues Aspie females have with sexuality and being able to "say no" or dating abusive partners. The study says that there is a confusion among the girls about what "having sex" really means. To say that uneducated and ignorant children "deserve" this is terrible. And we're not even scratching the surface of girls that were victims of incest and molestation.

HPV is so common that it's thought that anywhere from 60-70, to possibly 90% of women have this. It's almost always symptom free and men can't be tested for it, though they carry it. Some people believe that it isn't necessarily sexually transmitted and we know that condoms can't always prevent the spread of it. Because it's so common, doctors assume that girls have it and don't screen for it until after 30 years of age.

STDs have always been a problem. I had older relatives that were born "ret*d" because their dad brought home syphillis from the war. Syphillus was widespread and years ago was treated with mercury.

Zendell, this study is just further evidence that the abstinence only sex ed is FAILING. When you teach abstinence only, you don't discuss the realities of STDs and pregnancies. That's a fact. Teaching safe sex can curb promiscuity because teenagers are actually being informed of their options by people they might trust. Not just learning all the playground mythology about sex.

Teen Pregnancies are up after 15 years.



nirrti_rachelle
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2005
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,302
Location: The Dirty South

12 Mar 2008, 12:32 pm

If 25% of teenage girls are getting STDs, then apparently, there must be about the same corresponding amount in teenage boys since they couldn't get it from thin air. What's with all the slut-shaming lately?


_________________
"There is difference and there is power. And who holds the power decides the meaning of the difference." --June Jordan


pbcoll
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,892
Location: the City of Palaces

12 Mar 2008, 1:42 pm

zendell wrote:
I got a few comments.

1. They mention that 48% of black teenage girls have STDs compared to 20% of white teenage girls. That seems racist.

2. The most common STD was human papilloma virus (HPV). I didn't know it was an STD. I never heard of it until I read that Texas is forcing girls to get it and then on a vaccine commercial urging people to get it. The new HPV vaccine is supposed to reduce the chance of getting cervical cancer from HPV although I read that the drug company who makes it decided not to test their vaccine for carcinogenicity which means the vaccine that is supposed to protect against cancer may actually cause cancer itself. The manufacturer is also not responsible for any harm it causes thanks to a special law the vaccine manufacturers got their politicians in DC to pass. That means you aren't allowed to sue if the vaccines puts you in the hospital, causes a chronic disabling disease, or kills you. I'm definitely staying away from it. The article sound more like a drug company advertisement for their new HPV vaccine.

3. Why are STDs so common? Were they a problem 50 or 100 years ago? If not, someone needs to do some research to determine why they suddenly became a problem. Did people use condoms more often 50 years ago compared to now? They seem to be a new disease, like AIDS, or a rapidly increasing problem, like infertility which all interestingly help the population control agenda although apparently not very effectively.

4. abstinance = 100% protection. If you don't have sex, you can't get an STD. They need to teach this in school. Many people seem to think you can't get STDs or HIV if you use a condom. "Safe sex" education (as opposed to abstinance) taught in schools seems to encourage teenagers to have sex which results in STDs. I'm guessing that the majority of the 1 in 4 teen girls with STDs used condoms thinking it would protect them against STDs. They are also at risk for HIV although I think it's quite rare for it to be transmitted sexually.


1. If it's a statement of fact, I don't see why it should be kept secret just because it's not PC. I don't believe in burying our heads in the sand about problems.

3. Yes, they've always been extremely common. Syphilis (one of the most horrible diseases around if untreated) was very common in the past, until antibiotics came along.

4. I don't know about studies specific to the US, but for other countries there are studies that show that while people are well aware of condoms, STDs, etc, they often don't use condoms even thought they're available (the most pathetic example being men paying prostitutes extra to not use condoms). I don't know what the answer to that is, but the problem isn't the condom failure rate.


_________________
I am the steppenwolf that never learned to dance. (Sedaka)

El hombre es una bestia famélica, envidiosa e insaciable. (Francisco Tario)

I'm male by the way (yes, I know my avatar is misleading).


ShadesOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,983
Location: California

12 Mar 2008, 7:14 pm

Peko wrote:
:eew: :!: :idea: Maybe girls should keep their pants on. (I am BLUNT) Or at least use condoms/STD prevention. (If you're going too have sex look up prevention stuff. DUH!) I am not a precocious individual so I cannot really sympathize with these girls. Anyone else agree :?: STD's are :ncool:

I am a :geek:

Random: I used to have an :albino: rabbit.
Never met an :albino: human.
Has anyone here met an :albino: human :?:
If so 8)

What about boys? maybe *they* should be keeping their pants on.