Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ] 

reika
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 13 Aug 2007
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 933
Location: Alaska

15 Apr 2008, 11:08 am

Chevron denies 16.5-billion-dollar pollution damage in Ecuador
Posted Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:46am PDT

QUITO (AFP) - US oil giant Chevron on Monday rejected a court report holding it liable for 16.5 billion dollars in alleged environmental damage in Ecuador between 1964-1990, saying it owes the Ecuadoran government exactly "nothing."

"What we'll do is challenge it point by point ... and insist that the report is absurd and illegal," Chevron's Ecuador representative Rodrigo Perez told reporters after the government-commissioned report became known.

Quito has sued Chevron for widespread contamination its Texaco subsidiary's oil drilling operations allegedly caused in Amazon territories in the 26 years before it was sold to Ecuador's state-run oil company Petroecuador.

Several indigenous communities also filed a class-action lawsuit against Chevron in 2003, seeking compensation for soil pollution in their Amazon homelands.

A New York court in 1990 ordered Texaco to stand trial in Ecuador on environmental charges, the first time a US oil company was told to answer to charges in a foreign country.

However, Perez said his company "owes nothing for many reasons," including a 1995-1998 cleanup it did in the territories it had previously exploited that was approved by the Ecuadoran government.

"Any pollution you find now cannot reasonably have been caused by Texaco," he added.

Chevron, Perez said, "owes not a single penny" in Ecuador and "is not willing to give in," calling the Supreme Court-commissioned report "illegal and unfair."

The Quito-based Amazon Defense Coalition said Chevron had nobody to blame but itself for the legal mess it is in, since most of the evidence compiled in the official report came from the company's own field reports in the areas it exploited.

Even though Chevron analyzed soil samples from areas where it thought there was no contamination, the coalition said in a statement, "the lab results ... produced devastating numbers" of heavy metal contamination 200-630 times the US norms.

The expert report prepared by 15 scientists supervised by Ecuador's environmental department, the coalition added, "concluded ... that approximately 428 excess deaths from cancer could be attributed to the contamination left by oil field operations.


Its stuff like this that REALLY pisses me off. (I want a Prius wsmac!)


_________________
Did I dream this belief, or did I believe this dream?
Peter Gabriel

If only closed minds came with closed mouths. Lau: "But where would they put their feet?" Postpaleo: "Up their ass."


barcncpt44
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 80
Location: Anniston, AL

16 Apr 2008, 3:25 pm

all of the oil companies are big polluters. why are we not trying to switch to other resources that does not use oil or food for fuel. :twisted:


_________________
Visit my blog: www.geekalabama.com
A bland smile is like a green light at an intersection, it feels good when you get one, but you forget it the moment you're past it. -Doug Coupland


Roxas_XIII
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jan 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,217
Location: Laramie, WY

16 Apr 2008, 6:04 pm

barcncpt44 wrote:
all of the oil companies are big polluters. why are we not trying to switch to other resources that does not use oil or food for fuel. :twisted:


Because the oil companies wouldn't like that, and in case you didn't notice, they rule the world.


_________________
"Yeah, so this one time, I tried playing poker with tarot cards... got a full house, and about four people died." ~ Unknown comedian

Happy New Year from WP's resident fortune-teller! May the cards be ever in your favor.