Board index › General Discussion › News and Current Events

Man Wearing "World's Greatest Dad" T-Shirt is Sex

Page 1 of 1 [ 16 posts ] 

Previous topic | Next topic

Silver_Meteor
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,399
Location: Warwick, Rhode Island

08 Aug 2008, 10:59 pm

If you think you've seen it all....

http://news.aol.com/article/greatest-da ... ime/124574


_________________
Not through revolution but by evolution are all things accomplished in permanency.


Last edited by Silver_Meteor on 08 Aug 2008, 11:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

jrknothead
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,423

08 Aug 2008, 11:13 pm

Yikes... I wonder, was this sick bastid really someone's father, or was he just 'dressing for success'; ie wearing what he thought would give him the greatest chance of closing the deal?

I will never understand how some people can look at children as sexual objects, or how they have the ability to ignore the damage that they do to their victims...



viska
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jan 2008
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 720
Location: Everytime you close your eyes: Lies, lies.

08 Aug 2008, 11:21 pm

He wore it so if someone saw them together in public, they would assume he was her dad.



Venger
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,519

08 Aug 2008, 11:26 pm

Sociopaths think they are better than everybody else.



Postperson
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2004
Age: 68
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,023
Location: Uz

08 Aug 2008, 11:52 pm

They do indeed.



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

10 Aug 2008, 4:36 am

Ugh! :eew: :eew:



philosopherBoi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Aug 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,255

10 Aug 2008, 2:06 pm

slowmutant wrote:
Ugh! :eew: :eew:


Ditto

Can we get a janitor in here to clean up this puke please.



Delirium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,573
Location: not here

10 Aug 2008, 8:04 pm

Image

He even looks like a pedo.


_________________
I don't post here anymore. If you want to talk to me, go to the WP Facebook group or my Last.fm account.


slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

11 Aug 2008, 2:56 am

That is some ugly mug.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

11 Aug 2008, 2:59 am

He could be a manager at your local Wal-Mart!! ! (Just kidding!)



Warsie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,542
Location: Chicago, IL, USA

11 Aug 2008, 3:24 am

jrknothead wrote:
I will never understand how some people can look at children as sexual objects, or how they have the ability to ignore the damage that they do to their victims...


1. It's genetic, as is so-called "normal" attractions.

2. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._(1998)


_________________
I am a Star Wars Fan, Warsie here.
Masterdebating on chi-city's south side.......!


slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

11 Aug 2008, 3:27 am

So-called "normal" attractions? To what are you referring, Warsie? Is "normal" not normal in your opinion?

BTW if 9/11 really were an inside-job, would it make the victims any less dead?



release_the_bats
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jul 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,033

11 Aug 2008, 8:42 am

Warsie wrote:
jrknothead wrote:
I will never understand how some people can look at children as sexual objects, or how they have the ability to ignore the damage that they do to their victims...


1. It's genetic, as is so-called "normal" attractions.

2. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._(1998)


I think this is the key point from the study referenced above:

Quote:
Rind et al. contended that the degree of psychological damage was based on whether the child describes the encounter as consensual or not.


If your study sample includes everyone from people who consented to sex with a 19-year-old at the age of 17 to people who were violated against their will during early childhood, of course your results will be misleading.

What participants did have in common was that they were all college students. This and the former are problematic from a scientific point of view. And then one must consider the vast generalizations people have tried to make from the results of this one study (a common tendency among people who read study results, but don't really understand the research process).

It sounds like there were multiple problems with the design of the study, especially the way they found participants and grouped them together.

This is why under-graduate course work in research design and statistical analysis are now pre-requisites for most reputable PhD programs in the sciences. Not to mention what you're required to study during the program.



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

11 Aug 2008, 11:38 am

Why are you picking apart the study?



release_the_bats
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jul 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,033

14 Aug 2008, 12:28 pm

slowmutant wrote:
Why are you picking apart the study?


For fun. :D



oscuria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,748

14 Aug 2008, 7:02 pm

He is sex? Cool.


_________________
sticks and stones may kill you.