history_of_psychiatry wrote:
Why is it that whenever there is a news report of a criminal who just happens to be autistic they always have to mention that he is autistic? When someone who is dyslexic commits a crime they don't always mention that he's dyslexic. When someone who has ADHD commits a crime they don't always mention that he has ADHD. Autism doesn't usually play a factor in a criminal's act.
Because of the wild variances in the level of Autism.
If he has been an HFA/Aspie it probably would not have come up.
OTOH there are LFA or essentially NFAs out there who have almost ZERO control of their physicality. There is a small child like that at my church.
When a small child becomes violent - autistic or not - an adult can usually handle it.
OTOH when a cognitively impared ADULT person (and 18 qualifies) - autistic or otherwise neurologicly impared/delayed/whatever - becomes violent, only properly trained people can handle such an onslaught without becomming seriously injured.
Therefore the neurological imparement - whatever the label - is as material to the report as if he had been on crack.
The Sad/Unfortunate/Stigmatizing thing is that they made/generally make no differentiation as to where the "Autistic" person is on the Spectrum.
Spokane_Girl... There is such a thing as Ironic Humor - I was trying to use it to point out that the "victim" - by giving her child the name "Sky Walker" - was so unaware of the fundamential consequences of her actions that she probably did many, many other things wrong in the care/support of her LFA child...
_________________
Malum Prohibitum, Malum Habenae Regum Est.
I'm not Jesus. Stop punishing me for other people's sins.
True Liberty Expressed as Fiction:
http://www.bigheadpress.com/tpbtgn