Quote:
Apple_in_my_Eye wrote:
Quote:
Did the 5 year olds that got bombed also need to be "taught the error of their ways?"
No. They suffered from the ill doings of their parents. By the way, in a war collateral damage is inevitable. One sets out to win the war, not worry about the health of the children of the enemy. The Japs bombed Chinese cities and killed plenty of Chinese infants. What goes around comes around. They who sow the win, will reap the whirlwind.
Remember in a war sh*t happens and it flows downhill rapidly.
Their parents were school teachers, the father not in the military due to bad eyesight. They sounded like pretty good people, and didn't kill anybody. So what was their ill doing? They thought going to war was crazy, but the military/government didn't care what they thought. It's always easy to talk about abstract people, and define their lives and what they did and didn't do.
About collateral damage, it also serves as a great excuse for when civilians are targeted. It was a big experiment, while also serving a military purpose.
And yes, sh** flows downhill in war, including ordinary people getting starved by their own government, and bombed by somebody else's at the same time. They didn't get asked their opinion about the war, or bombing China, or if they wanted to be taken out of school and sent to work in a factory making bullets. One of the parents above was arrested by the Kempeitai for saying something against the war to a child (who reported it). Yes, sh** happens; that doesn't make it right.
I wonder if it's a majority of people in wars who want the people who want it so much to go away somewhere and fight it out amongst themselves.