Hatred Sucks.
I think there's a relatively simple solution. But, it would mean acknowledging that sometimes some of us have anger issues. I know I do. It seems to me there's a little more tolerance on the political forums for high passion and misbehavior. Maybe there's a way we could have a gloves off forum, or a frustration forum? Maybe by invitation only? Ahahahaha... sorry. Even saying that, I know some dips**t will wander in there and get their feelings hurt, report us all and we'll get warnings.
In all other forums feelings must be respected, I do that myself anyway. But, it's nice to have a place to get aggression out that won't hurt the more sensitive members. I could be as nasty as Fnord is, easily. So, in this respect, he's not alone.
_________________
Disagreeing with you doesn't mean I hate you, it just means we disagree.
Neurocognitive exam in May 2019, diagnosed with ASD, Asperger's type in June 2019.
Borromeo wrote:
Fnord wrote:
EzraS wrote:
I am pretty blunt and straightforward. But I don't feel like anyone hates me. Or maybe I'm just not aware of it.
It's fairly evident, don't you think?This.
Your attitude is doing more harm than you know, and it is serious harm.
I had thought you rather ill-used by Wrong Planet's membership and was a bit worried about you--but after getting some PMs about the harm you are causing, Fnord, I can only say that the ill you work affects people far away in serious ways and you could, no, you already have, hurt people.
Never take pride in being outspoken. A jackass brays but that doesn't mean you'll hear him at Carnegie Hall.
And I cannot blame the many members of the Forum who at the moment would like a break from hearing you.
Talking about people behind their backs (the PMs) is irresponsible and damaging to the entire group.
If someone does not like what a member says, they don't have to listen.
Are not these attacks outspoken also?
Why do people feel it is necessary to change another person? God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change (including other people.)
I am with magz and amity on this.
_________________
The river is the melody
And sky is the refrain - Gordon Lightfoot
magz wrote:
domineekee wrote:
Fnord's a big boy, tough as boots, there is a problem, let's get it sorted.
I don't believe coming out as tough changes any rules of the Haven.
How does this thread belong in the haven if Fnord is unscathed by his "haters"? What is the point?
It's no longer a fun sport being acerbic towards the young and vulnerable, great, long may that continue.
Members, no matter how popular or erudite have to be held to account for bullying.
domineekee wrote:
How does this thread belong in the haven if Fnord is unscathed by his "haters"? What is the point?
How do you know? Poke until it bleeds because it has no feelings anyway? Why do you deny this particular member a right for support granted for all WP members?domineekee wrote:
It's no longer a fun sport being acerbic towards the young and vulnerable, great, long may that continue.
Members, no matter how popular or erudite have to be held to account for bullying.
You are responsible for keeping yourself from bullying others. Only this. If you see a bullying situation and want to help, report it. Right now, I do see a bullying situation and I ask you to refrain before I do report it.
Members, no matter how popular or erudite have to be held to account for bullying.
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
magz wrote:
domineekee wrote:
How does this thread belong in the haven if Fnord is unscathed by his "haters"? What is the point?
How do you know? Poke until it bleeds because it has no feelings anyway? Why do you deny this particular member a right for support granted for all WP members?Because he's proving himself to be a very slippery fish indeed. He's been carrying on with his antics for years and many people site him as being their reason for leaving the site.
domineekee wrote:
It's no longer a fun sport being acerbic towards the young and vulnerable, great, long may that continue.
Members, no matter how popular or erudite have to be held to account for bullying.
Members, no matter how popular or erudite have to be held to account for bullying.
magz wrote:
You are responsible for keeping yourself from bullying others. Only this. If you see a bullying situation and want to help, report it. Right now, I do see a bullying situation and I ask you to refrain before I do report it.
I wish that you would do the same when Fnord is up to his old tricks.
In the meantime, please have a read of this.
Quote:
to be fair, but it's difficult ethically to continue to be involved in a forum where the likes of Fnord are permitted to attack the vulnerable & the genuinely distressed
and
Quote:
there were plenty of other racy topics that she was giving a free pass, which prompted a non-mod user, Fnord, to start sending me private messages like "You're not welcome here. Stop lying about our mods. Bye!" and also to thank ...
and rather ironically
Quote:
However, I would like to say Fnord is one of the biggest bootlicking losers the internet has ever seen, the guy has posted multiple threads about how he was gonna leave and most of the replies were good riddance prick but he still sticks ...
What is justice? Indeed.
Last edited by Sahn on 30 Oct 2019, 6:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
magz wrote:
I suspected some PM work behind the current massive sh-storm against the OP. Why so many vulnerable, emotional individuals attacked him at once without any obvious action from the OP? Now I've got some evidence for my suspicion. I wonder if the person behind it is the one I think... To be clear: one now Unmentionable user tried to PM me into hating some other users. I suspect it may as well be happening now between currently active users.
Good Morning, Magz!Remember, mere suspicion proves nothing.
That said, here's my suspicion: One or more mods were dismissed for abuse of authority. Their friends and admirers have rallied in support of those mods, and have since gone on the attack against a victim who does not have the authority to dismiss, suspend, or even issue a "board warning" to defend himself.
Please submit your evidence to The Walrus and the other mods. If it's a PM, then report it by clicking on the exclamation point in the lower-right corner. You can even use the quote function to send a copy to each of the mods, but don't post it publicly -- that's against the rules.
Have a nice day!
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
domineekee wrote:
I wish that you would do the same when Fnord is up to his old tricks.
I would be very interested to know "his old tricks". I've never experienced being tricked by him. Misunderstood, yes. Not shown empathy, yes. But tricked? Can you show me some archive?domineekee wrote:
In the meantime, please have a read of this.
and
and rather ironically
What is justice? Indeed.
Quote:
to be fair, but it's difficult ethically to continue to be involved in a forum where the likes of Fnord are permitted to attack the vulnerable & the genuinely distressed
and
Quote:
there were plenty of other racy topics that she was giving a free pass, which prompted a non-mod user, Fnord, to start sending me private messages like "You're not welcome here. Stop lying about our mods. Bye!" and also to thank ...
and rather ironically
Quote:
However, I would like to say Fnord is one of the biggest bootlicking losers the internet has ever seen, the guy has posted multiple threads about how he was gonna leave and most of the replies were good riddance prick but he still sticks ...
What is justice? Indeed.
I see a lot of quotes of people (or one person, I don't know) slandering Fnord.
Why does it matter?
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
domineekee wrote:
Here's what they make of him on trolling site Kiwi Farms.
Irrelevant, even if true.
Quote:
Maybe Fnord should join us.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
Fnord wrote:
magz wrote:
I suspected some PM work behind the current massive sh-storm against the OP. Why so many vulnerable, emotional individuals attacked him at once without any obvious action from the OP? Now I've got some evidence for my suspicion. I wonder if the person behind it is the one I think... To be clear: one now Unmentionable user tried to PM me into hating some other users. I suspect it may as well be happening now between currently active users.
Good Morning, Magz!Remember, mere suspicion proves nothing.
That said, here's my suspicion: One or more mods were dismissed for abuse of authority. Their friends and admirers have rallied in support of those mods, and have since gone on the attack against a victim who does not have the authority to dismiss, suspend, or even issue a "board warning" to defend himself.
Please submit your evidence to The Walrus and the other mods. If it's a PM, then report it by clicking on the exclamation point in the lower-right corner. You can even use the quote function to send a copy to each of the mods, but don't post it publicly -- that's against the rules.
Have a nice day!
Morning!
As the person who tried to set me out against other members is long banned by now, I guess my reports would be redundant
Also, I know my suspicions are just suspitions. I kept them to myself until I saw Borromeo mention receiving PMs about how bad you were.
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
Amity wrote:
magz wrote:
Amity wrote:
However I see concrete evidence of Fnords potential to alter his way of interacting with the self diagnosed.
I guess I'm part of it.Unfortunately, all the change and repentance in the world matters nothing to haters, because haters simply gotta hate.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
Last edited by Fnord on 30 Oct 2019, 6:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
magz wrote:
... I know my suspicions are just suspicions. I kept them to myself until I saw Borromeo mention receiving PMs about how bad you were.
Then the mods can request that Borromeo submit those PMs for examination. Once that is done, this s***storm should blow over.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
EzraS wrote:
Fnord wrote:
EzraS wrote:
I am pretty blunt and straightforward. But I don't feel like anyone hates me. Or maybe I'm just not aware of it.
It's fairly evident, don't you think?_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
kraftiekortie wrote:
Very few people really hate somebody here on WrongPlanet.
Ahh ... but it is those few who are trying to make life miserable for the rest of us by doing the very same things they accuse others of doing.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
