CaptainTrips222 wrote:
I think a lot of people who ask for advice already know what they want to hear. They get offended if it's not what they had in mind.
^^ THIS ^^
I was on a recreational planning committee where the next-oldest person was about 15 years younger than I. My planning method involves determining available resources, determining interests, and determining what the costs may be based on current market prices for services and goods, and whatever permits may be required. Theirs involved deciding what they thought would be "cool", advertising the event heavily, and then figuring out who would pay for it.
Inevitably, they ignored my methodical approach, and barrelled straight in to the event.
It was only when they started blaming my "negative attitude" (not their poor planning) for the subsequent disasters during the actual event (bad food, lousy band, cheap beer, etc.) did I resign from the committee. Fortunately, I had kept copies of the minutes of each meeting, and used them to show to our employer that (a) I had a plan, that (b) covered all contingencies, that (c) provided decent food and entertainment, and that (d) the other members of the committee had rejected in favor of a plan that was more "fun".
They got in trouble and had to pay back the expense overages, and since my signature did not appear on any of their documents, their attempts to blame me fell on deaf ears.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.