jimservo wrote:
I use the term NT only as a generic to describe non-aspies or those without say, mental disorders. It non-intended as any mean label or intended to mean that all people that are "NT" are alike, less intelligent, or less important then aspies, or any other particular group.
I'm generally the same way, I don't use AS as a lable, I just acknowledge that a difference exists.... Especially since most NTs don't take to kindly of new differences. Though I do think scientifically we might be evolving.... Most NTs NEED lables, aparently, this is the world they have created. But that doesn't mean good NTs don't exist. But NTs are more generally geared toward social pecking order and dominance and that kinda stuff. You can't always fault them for it because most of the time they really don't know any better, and there are even a statistically smaller group of aspies who act this way.
People talk often though in condemnation of highschoolers for immaturely following lables, but those same people criticizing usually haven't outgrown the labelling stage themselves. Their lables just change to more "adult" lables, like conservative, liberal, libertarian, socialist, christian, jewish, atheist, buddhist, muslim, pagan, male, female, black, white, brown, asian, arab, american indian, american, english, russian, japanese, mexican, etc etc. (ad naseum).
Noting biological differences isn't so bad, but when people define themselves by their differences and use them as lables it becomes a bad thing. Ideological lables are just lables, pure and simple. Ideological lables are a CHOICE, nobody is born with them. And, no ideological theory in today's world are without holes.