Girlfriend barred from entering US :(

Page 4 of 8 [ 113 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

GiantHockeyFan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,293

17 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm

On both my trips to the USA, I was pulled over for a search and they semi-interrogated me about where I was going, where I live and work, what my job responsibilities are, where I was going and what I was planning to see, what I was bringing,etc, etc, etc. At least they were professional about it and it didn't cost anything.

Returning to Canada and visiting France was a complete breeze that took a few seconds. As far as I'm concerned, I would be a huge step down to go from Canada to the USA legally or not so this seems all the more puzzling to me: there seem to be far more crazies in the USA in my experience. I may visit again but am in no mood to rush out and do it again.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

17 Jun 2016, 2:33 pm

YippySkippy wrote:
There's a difference between a government not wanting someone to be on welfare (who wants to be on welfare, anyway?) and assuming that they will be and making them jump through all kinds of hoops because of that assumption. Everything about the American immigration system makes people feel like lepers.

I wasn't under the impression that "welfare" is easy to get in the US anyways. I don't see why a non-citizen should get it anyways? How does that even work? It's only for families with children and it's temporary as well. Should I tell them we are asexual and aren't planning on having children? Having children would be the only way we could get welfare. Would they even know what "asexual" means? Most people are clueless.

The US isn't Europe. The government doesn't just hand out money to people. The only way to get a permanent income is to be on disability. You can't get unemployment benefits either if you haven't even worked at job requiring an SS number and tax filings. How can you even get benefits if you don't even have a green card? It seems they don't want people coming and living on the streets. But why would people immigrate if they're going to be on the streets?



BirdInFlight
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jun 2013
Age: 64
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,501
Location: If not here, then where?

17 Jun 2016, 6:22 pm

Welfare isn't easy to get, agreed, in fact not even every European country is exactly as free handing it out as you think. Europe doesn't have the same policies all across Europe; they are still different countries (just about...) who have devised respectively different systems and it's hugely different in, say, Sweden, than in the UK. There's even a country in Europe that has instigated an Unconditional Personal Income while other countries will probably never adopt such a thing. The UK right wing governments would never let that happen in the UK, they are hateful to the very people who might greatly benefit from something like that, particularly those with disabilities mental or physical.

But that's another matter.

Back to the United States:
What it is, in their way of thinking, is that they don't want someone coming there and either winding up on the street (therefore a "problem" they didn't have to have), or working illegally before (or without) the processing of any legal status. And the welfare restriction is after after you get your green card, or after you've had work, of even if you get legal work after getting your green card but you don't make much and want to apply for even just food stamps. You're not supposed to draw on any public funds as a permanent resident alien, at least for a period of time as far as I remember, which is in years not months.

So this is even after going through the green card process and being legal to stay and legal to work and after legally obtaining your social security number. You're restricted from applying for any kind of state help that a regular citizen might be qualified to apply for for in the same circumstances whatever those are that might crop up.

That's why they want to make sure the person who wants to reside can either support themselves or will be supported financially by either a sponsor or the partner they are marrying.

All they're looking to achieve by that is just one thing: to not permit to reside someone who might be a burden on public funds even down the line, even after getting settled/granted a green card etc. It's like "Our own born citizens can be a burden and we're just going to have to have that happen, but if we have the choice to let a brand new one in to add to those figures, no thank you."

It's all about them having the opportunity to be selective when there's a choice.

Certain criteria they have is just good sense, even while at the same time it seems unfair and punitive.

I kind of "get" both sides of it, I can see both sides. It both sucks and yet makes sense. It's stringently excluding and ass-holey. Yet at the same time, having none of these rules would produce chaotic results. It's a nation that a LOT of people in other countries covet living in. The Immigration Department know this and they have to have in place some kind of brakes on that.

Australia is apparently pretty tough too these days.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

17 Jun 2016, 9:46 pm

BirdInFlight wrote:
Welfare isn't easy to get, agreed, in fact not even every European country is exactly as free handing it out as you think. Europe doesn't have the same policies all across Europe; they are still different countries (just about...) who have devised respectively different systems and it's hugely different in, say, Sweden, than in the UK. There's even a country in Europe that has instigated an Unconditional Personal Income while other countries will probably never adopt such a thing. The UK right wing governments would never let that happen in the UK, they are hateful to the very people who might greatly benefit from something like that, particularly those with disabilities mental or physical.

But that's another matter.

Back to the United States:
What it is, in their way of thinking, is that they don't want someone coming there and either winding up on the street (therefore a "problem" they didn't have to have), or working illegally before (or without) the processing of any legal status. And the welfare restriction is after after you get your green card, or after you've had work, of even if you get legal work after getting your green card but you don't make much and want to apply for even just food stamps. You're not supposed to draw on any public funds as a permanent resident alien, at least for a period of time as far as I remember, which is in years not months.

So this is even after going through the green card process and being legal to stay and legal to work and after legally obtaining your social security number. You're restricted from applying for any kind of state help that a regular citizen might be qualified to apply for for in the same circumstances whatever those are that might crop up.

That's why they want to make sure the person who wants to reside can either support themselves or will be supported financially by either a sponsor or the partner they are marrying.

All they're looking to achieve by that is just one thing: to not permit to reside someone who might be a burden on public funds even down the line, even after getting settled/granted a green card etc. It's like "Our own born citizens can be a burden and we're just going to have to have that happen, but if we have the choice to let a brand new one in to add to those figures, no thank you."

It's all about them having the opportunity to be selective when there's a choice.

Certain criteria they have is just good sense, even while at the same time it seems unfair and punitive.

I kind of "get" both sides of it, I can see both sides. It both sucks and yet makes sense. It's stringently excluding and ass-holey. Yet at the same time, having none of these rules would produce chaotic results. It's a nation that a LOT of people in other countries covet living in. The Immigration Department know this and they have to have in place some kind of brakes on that.

Australia is apparently pretty tough too these days.

All this talk of people being a "burden" if they have trouble with work is super depressing. Makes me feel like killing myself. They don't like people who might be disabled and a "burden" but they'd probably let in an abusive rich f**k. It really does all come down to money it seems. I get more and more suicidal thinking about this s**t.



BirdInFlight
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jun 2013
Age: 64
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,501
Location: If not here, then where?

18 Jun 2016, 6:29 am

I totally agree about the "burden" notion, and I also want to clarify that this is not my own personal belief regarding those who need welfare assistance. I think there should be even more provision than there is for people who have genuine difficulty and I think these people should NEVER be considered a burden. I also believe that even if such a person wants to emigrate, their disability, mental or physical and their need for some help, shouldn't necessarily be a barrier.

I have no idea how that would work and it's probably a utopian impossibility, but yes, I don't like like the sense I get that a "burden" notion comes into play with most governments who have a welfare system. The UK, for one, makes you feel like scum for even needing what they offer in terms of any welfare.

But in my opinion it tends to be, arguably, the unspoken stance of most governments and even some staff on the frontline of the systems.... In other words, even though the welfare system exists and is funded and is meant to be there for the compassionate of goal of helping those who genuinely need the help, one can't help getting the feeling that they make it so hard to qualify for that it's given grudgingly, and that there is a sense of the Powers That Be looking down on anyone needing the system. Especially in the case of anyone applying to immigrate for non-refugee reasons but "just because" or -- especially -- in the case of relationship reasons.

And it's not that I defend them having restrictions in place on disability or needing assistance per se, I mean more like it's good that there are restrictions on things like criminal records, or close examination of the ability for an able person to not need public funds, etc. That's what I'm intending to mean.

I don't mean to depress you with all this -- I've said too much and this thread has become more of an examination of the problems in the US policies, rather than keeping it about your girlfriend.

Rest assured that in all likelihood you can sort all these things out and things are going to proceed just fine. There are cases every day that "go through" just fine, even ones more complicated than this. This is only one "send-back" and she hasn't done anything wrong.

You are engaging a lawyer specializing in the field who will know exactly how to proceed next; you also have family who can be responsible for the financial support aspect.

Things are probably going to proceed in a run of the mill manner and you'll get there in the end.

Just be aware they do make there be hoops to jump through, several rounds of paperwork to file, and each filing costs fees -- I don't mean fees to the lawyers, I mean the immigration department themselves charge you money for filing your applications.

It's expensive and a huge pain in the ass, because they kind of make it be that way. People manage to successfully navigate through and there's no reason why you can't too, just be sure to know it's a big deal.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

18 Jun 2016, 11:58 am

BirdInFlight wrote:
I totally agree about the "burden" notion, and I also want to clarify that this is not my own personal belief regarding those who need welfare assistance. I think there should be even more provision than there is for people who have genuine difficulty and I think these people should NEVER be considered a burden. I also believe that even if such a person wants to emigrate, their disability, mental or physical and their need for some help, shouldn't necessarily be a barrier.

I have no idea how that would work and it's probably a utopian impossibility, but yes, I don't like like the sense I get that a "burden" notion comes into play with most governments who have a welfare system. The UK, for one, makes you feel like scum for even needing what they offer in terms of any welfare.

But in my opinion it tends to be, arguably, the unspoken stance of most governments and even some staff on the frontline of the systems.... In other words, even though the welfare system exists and is funded and is meant to be there for the compassionate of goal of helping those who genuinely need the help, one can't help getting the feeling that they make it so hard to qualify for that it's given grudgingly, and that there is a sense of the Powers That Be looking down on anyone needing the system. Especially in the case of anyone applying to immigrate for non-refugee reasons but "just because" or -- especially -- in the case of relationship reasons.

And it's not that I defend them having restrictions in place on disability or needing assistance per se, I mean more like it's good that there are restrictions on things like criminal records, or close examination of the ability for an able person to not need public funds, etc. That's what I'm intending to mean.

I don't mean to depress you with all this -- I've said too much and this thread has become more of an examination of the problems in the US policies, rather than keeping it about your girlfriend.

Rest assured that in all likelihood you can sort all these things out and things are going to proceed just fine. There are cases every day that "go through" just fine, even ones more complicated than this. This is only one "send-back" and she hasn't done anything wrong.

You are engaging a lawyer specializing in the field who will know exactly how to proceed next; you also have family who can be responsible for the financial support aspect.

Things are probably going to proceed in a run of the mill manner and you'll get there in the end.

Just be aware they do make there be hoops to jump through, several rounds of paperwork to file, and each filing costs fees -- I don't mean fees to the lawyers, I mean the immigration department themselves charge you money for filing your applications.

It's expensive and a huge pain in the ass, because they kind of make it be that way. People manage to successfully navigate through and there's no reason why you can't too, just be sure to know it's a big deal.

She will be supported no matter what. If I can't fully support her, my parents will help out.



YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

19 Jun 2016, 8:23 am

Sponsoring is not supporting. My parents sponsored my husband, but they didn't give him (or the government) any money because he got a job. I supported us with my savings until he could find one. Which he could only do after receiving his social security number, which took about two months AFTER we entered the country.



Skilpadde
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2008
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,019

19 Jun 2016, 11:37 am

off topic posts have been removed, and Katy's latest sock puppet has been banned.

Please return to the topic of this Haven thread.


_________________
BOLTZ 17/3 2012 - 12/11 2020
Beautiful, sweet, gentle, playful, loyal
simply the best and one of a kind
love you and miss you, dear boy

Stop the wolf kills! https://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeact ... 3091429765


DataB4
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 May 2016
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,744
Location: U.S.

19 Jun 2016, 11:50 am

This is so sad and heartless, sending someone back after they've already gotten a visa. I wish the both of you all the best. How are you both doing now? Hanging in there? :(



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

19 Jun 2016, 11:55 am

YippySkippy wrote:
Sponsoring is not supporting. My parents sponsored my husband, but they didn't give him (or the government) any money because he got a job. I supported us with my savings until he could find one. Which he could only do after receiving his social security number, which took about two months AFTER we entered the country.

But it is clear I need my parents to sponsor since I don't make 125% of the poverty level. I get disability and work 15 hours a week currently. I'd rather work more, but I don't know whether full time is possible with my exhaustion issues and depression (I suspect something is physically wrong - but nobody can find anything). I could probably work 30 hours, but it is hard finding such a job and I will then lose disability.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,951
Location:      

19 Jun 2016, 7:24 pm

marshall wrote:
YippySkippy wrote:
Sponsoring is not supporting. My parents sponsored my husband, but they didn't give him (or the government) any money because he got a job. I supported us with my savings until he could find one. Which he could only do after receiving his social security number, which took about two months AFTER we entered the country.
But it is clear I need my parents to sponsor ...
But your parents would not be marrying your girlfriend - you would. That makes her sponsorship your legal responsibility, unless your parents have already agreed to it.

Either way, don't let the immigration people find out. They could ban her from re-entering the country for at least ten years; and by that time, either or both of may find someone else.

I seriously suggest that you secure the services of a reputable immigration lawyer.


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

20 Jun 2016, 9:47 am

I had no income at all when my husband came to the States. If there's another sponsor, I don't think it matters.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

20 Jun 2016, 10:06 am

Ever since 9/11, immigration has gotten much stricter.

They were strict even before 9/11.

I'd cover all my bases, if I were you. Dot my "i's." cross my "t's."

I would err on the side of caution.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,951
Location:      

20 Jun 2016, 12:20 pm

YippySkippy wrote:
I had no income at all when my husband came to the States. If there's another sponsor, I don't think it matters.
I was in the Navy when I filed the petition for my wife's citizenship under the direction of an immigration lawyer. It took a year or two to work its way through the bureaucracy, but it finally paid off! :heart:


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

20 Jun 2016, 1:07 pm

Now her parents want me to immigrate to Turkey. I am afraid. I said I wasn't sure I could do that and now she is upset. I'm upset. She is afraid to come to the US now because of how the border police treated her. I don't know what happened. I don't know what they did. I'm trying to reassure her it isn't personal. Her mom doesn't want her to come here now. I'm feeling broken. I don't know how I can begin the process of filing for a K1 if she doesn't agree. I think it's her parents more than her. They are being rigid and irrational. They were open before, now they aren't. They don't speak English and I don't speak Turkish so it's really hard to fully communicate. This is just awful.



Last edited by marshall on 20 Jun 2016, 1:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

20 Jun 2016, 1:09 pm

I am definitely getting a lawyer to help. I just need to make sure I have a good one. I'm definitely not doing anything alone. Right now the problem is she needs to agree. :(