Cornflake wrote:
<snip>
She's going to keep coming back until she's worked through her butthurt. Engaging at least allows that to happen.
But also, should we ignore someone who's slandering good people, wouldn't that just amount to letting her narrative go unchallenged and lend it credibility?
It seems like the request is to not respond to a situation that demands a response. That's not possible and it's disappointing that you don't recognize the nature of that request.
If more mods are needed to ensure there's someone who can respond as you'd prefer, perhaps it's time to pick someone because the people who've been empowered to respond as you'd prefer haven't been active in awhile and can't be counted on as a result.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.