I'm very sorry to hear about your job loss and the two assaults; no wonder you feel the way you do right now.
Fullofstars wrote:
I can't. My ex is suing for custody. There was a pre-trial conference last week and I heard back from my lawyer just yesterday that the case is going to be heard in the court in the state/county where I lived until last year because of some timeline statute. She (judge) also made it clear that if I don't move back to that area, she may very well rule in his favor despite his record for assault. I have a hearing coming up, and the language from the conference suggested that the hearing will be pointless. She is more impressed with his job/income/homeownership/marriage than the idea of a single, unwed mother who has been able to successfully raise a well adjusted child despite having a violent crazyass for a father. It's a very conservative, religious county, and I'm neither of those things.
I'm guessing that you are talking about the Lancaster area? I've lived here for years, work in social services and can say it seems pretty rare for judges here not to side with mothers in custody cases.
You're absolutely correct about it being largely a conservative and religious area, but because of that, they often seem to think children belong with their biological mothers, no matter what. In fact, I've seen situations where mothers retained custody despite histories of psychological problems, addiction issues, a history of intervention from Children & Youth, etc. So, I think it's possible that conservative bias might not be as big of a problem for your case as it might seem.